Huatai Securities Co., Ltd.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, INVR.L has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while INVR.L trades at $610.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas INVR.L's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INVR.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to INVR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, INVP.L has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while INVP.L trades at $471.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas INVP.L's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INVP.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to INVP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, IGG.L has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while IGG.L trades at $1,089.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas IGG.L's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGG.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to IGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, PLUS.L has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while PLUS.L trades at $3,284.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas PLUS.L's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLUS.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to PLUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, TCAP.L has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while TCAP.L trades at $268.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas TCAP.L's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCAP.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to TCAP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, 0QL7.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while 0QL7.L trades at $227.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas 0QL7.L's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QL7.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to 0QL7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, ALPH.L has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while ALPH.L trades at $3,140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas ALPH.L's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALPH.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to ALPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, 0W89.L has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while 0W89.L trades at $9.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas 0W89.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0W89.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to 0W89.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, CMCX.L has a market cap of 709.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while CMCX.L trades at $255.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas CMCX.L's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMCX.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to CMCX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, EFGD.IL has a market cap of 665.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while EFGD.IL trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas EFGD.IL's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFGD.IL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to EFGD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, CBG.L has a market cap of 497.55M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while CBG.L trades at $334.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas CBG.L's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBG.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to CBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, NUM.L has a market cap of 377.86M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while NUM.L trades at $343.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas NUM.L's P/E ratio is 171.75. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUM.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to NUM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, FRP.L has a market cap of 325.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while FRP.L trades at $132.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas FRP.L's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRP.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to FRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, 0RS1.L has a market cap of 227.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while 0RS1.L trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas 0RS1.L's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RS1.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to 0RS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, PEEL.L has a market cap of 83.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while PEEL.L trades at $73.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas PEEL.L's P/E ratio is -73.50. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEEL.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to PEEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, 0RPP.L has a market cap of 33.14M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while 0RPP.L trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas 0RPP.L's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RPP.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to 0RPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, CAV.L has a market cap of 28.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while CAV.L trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas CAV.L's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to CAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, FCAP.L has a market cap of 27.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while FCAP.L trades at $7.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas FCAP.L's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCAP.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to FCAP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, TAVI.L has a market cap of 18.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while TAVI.L trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas TAVI.L's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAVI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to TAVI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, ARB.L has a market cap of 17.93M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while ARB.L trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas ARB.L's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARB.L's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to ARB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, CNKS.L has a market cap of 16.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while CNKS.L trades at $29.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas CNKS.L's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNKS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to CNKS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, QBT.L has a market cap of 9.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while QBT.L trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas QBT.L's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QBT.L's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to QBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, FKE.L has a market cap of 6.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while FKE.L trades at $57.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas FKE.L's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FKE.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to FKE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, JIM.L has a market cap of 6.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while JIM.L trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas JIM.L's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JIM.L's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to JIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, WHI.L has a market cap of 5.71M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while WHI.L trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas WHI.L's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to WHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, AFN.L has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while AFN.L trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas AFN.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFN.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is less volatile compared to AFN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, AGFX.L has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while AGFX.L trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas AGFX.L's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGFX.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to AGFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, 0QLV.L has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while 0QLV.L trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas 0QLV.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QLV.L's ROE of +10.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to 0QLV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, MAC.L has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while MAC.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas MAC.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAC.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to MAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, EFGD.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while EFGD.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas EFGD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFGD.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HTSC.L has daily volatility of 20.22 and EFGD.L has daily volatility of N/A.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, ARDN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while ARDN.L trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas ARDN.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARDN.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to ARDN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, AFX.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while AFX.L trades at $1,920.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas AFX.L's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFX.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HTSC.L has daily volatility of 20.22 and AFX.L has daily volatility of N/A.

HTSC.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HTSC.L stands at 14.62B. In comparison, K3C.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HTSC.L is priced at $20.00, while K3C.L trades at $349.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HTSC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.26, whereas K3C.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTSC.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to K3C.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTSC.L is more volatile compared to K3C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTSC.L.