HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF HMUS.L Peers
See (HMUS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMUS.L | $4,160.00 | -1.26% | 2.54B | N/A | N/A | +1.32% |
| CNDX.L | $1,197.80 | -1.22% | 21.15T | 32.32 | $37.06 | N/A |
| UC65.L | $58.32 | +0.44% | 4.82T | N/A | N/A | +1.72% |
| UB02.L | $4,322.00 | -0.07% | 3.62T | N/A | N/A | +1.84% |
| IUSA.L | $4,282.63 | -1.24% | 1.28T | N/A | N/A | +1.11% |
| SSAC.L | $6,826.00 | -0.98% | 1.02T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | $39,835.00 | -1.18% | 962.11B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | $7,211.00 | -0.89% | 826.31B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | $7,744.50 | -1.94% | 765.53B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | $4,700.50 | -1.95% | 762.83B | N/A | N/A | +2.78% |
Stock Comparison
HMUS.L vs CNDX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CNDX.L has a market cap of 21.15T. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CNDX.L trades at $1,197.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNDX.L's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CNDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UC65.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 4.82T. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UC65.L trades at $58.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UB02.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.62T. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UB02.L trades at $4,322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.28T. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IUSA.L trades at $4,282.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.02T. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SSAC.L trades at $6,826.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 962.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while EQGB.L trades at $39,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 826.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SMEA.L trades at $7,211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XESC.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 765.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XESC.L trades at $7,744.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XESX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 762.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XESX.L trades at $4,700.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 755.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while MEUD.L trades at $21,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IITU.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 712.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IITU.L trades at $2,407.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 689.07B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while JPSR.L trades at $1,952.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs JT13.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 678.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while JT13.L trades at $603.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 659.44B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UB0D.L trades at $2,103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 633.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CNAL.L trades at $11,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 543.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IWRD.L trades at $6,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 527.88B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XDAX.L trades at $18,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 506.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while PHGP.L trades at $23,185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 493.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while GLDA.L trades at $9,871.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 475.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XMMS.L trades at $4,600.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 451.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while MXWS.L trades at $8,827.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 424.07B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XMUS.L trades at $12,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 418.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XMEU.L trades at $8,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UC44.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 413.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UC44.L trades at $12,441.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CS51.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 401.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CS51.L trades at $16,946.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 362.41B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IEEM.L trades at $3,384.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs EUE.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 359.77B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while EUE.L trades at $4,594.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UB32.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 342.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UB32.L trades at $8,601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CACX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 331.23B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CACX.L trades at $6,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 300.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while GBSS.L trades at $22,828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 299.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XSX6.L trades at $11,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 298.10B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SEMA.L trades at $3,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 287.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IWFQ.L trades at $5,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 275.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SGBX.L trades at $23,829.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 265.43B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IWFV.L trades at $3,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 240.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while ISPY.L trades at $2,251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 232.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CEA1.L trades at $14,413.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 218.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while RBTX.L trades at $1,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 218.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CPJ1.L trades at $14,746.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs JERE.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 217.44B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while JERE.L trades at $3,860.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 217.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while JRDE.L trades at $3,622.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SUES.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 215.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SUES.L trades at $585.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 197.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IUQF.L trades at $1,074.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 193.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while HMEF.L trades at $861.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 192.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while PHSP.L trades at $2,258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 191.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IWFM.L trades at $6,354.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 178.49B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XDEV.L trades at $3,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 177.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SOYU.L trades at $306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 168.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SPGP.L trades at $1,721.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 167.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CEUR.L trades at $30,545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 166.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UIFS.L trades at $1,079.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 162.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XXSC.L trades at $5,341.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 153.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XDEQ.L trades at $5,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 148.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while GBSP.L trades at $1,730.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 147.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while PRIR.L trades at $1,453.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 137.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IEFV.L trades at $846.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CU1.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 136.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CU1.L trades at $44,147.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 133.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IPRP.L trades at $2,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs GILS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while GILS.L trades at $10,013.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 131.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while ISP6.L trades at $6,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs WATL.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 130.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while WATL.L trades at $5,668.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 128.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XZEU.L trades at $2,771.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 127.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CUS1.L trades at $36,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 126.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XCX6.L trades at $1,322.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 124.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while 0GWB.IL trades at $489.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UC79.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 120.75B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UC79.L trades at $1,088.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs INFL.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while INFL.L trades at $9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CG1.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 115.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CG1.L trades at $35,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 113.92B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SP5G.L trades at $196.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 61.15. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CB5.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 112.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CB5.L trades at $3,812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 111.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CSPX.L trades at $617.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IJPN.L trades at $1,373.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 108.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IGSG.L trades at $5,746.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 107.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XRSG.L trades at $22,113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 106.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SPEX.L trades at $4,328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while PRIC.L trades at $1,589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 105.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while JRDM.L trades at $2,295.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 105.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XDEM.L trades at $5,347.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 104.49B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IEUX.L trades at $4,015.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs H50E.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 104.49B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while H50E.L trades at $4,777.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs SPES.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 104.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while SPES.L trades at $4,087.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 104.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while RIEG.L trades at $1,428.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 101.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IWDA.L trades at $111.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IMV.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 100.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IMV.L trades at $5,746.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 98.85B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while DAXX.L trades at $18,136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CSCA.L trades at $16,718.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 92.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while MTIX.L trades at $13,933.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs UB45.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 91.96B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while UB45.L trades at $6,036.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 91.76B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while PRIJ.L trades at $2,368.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.35B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IUKD.L trades at $827.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L and IUKD.L have similar daily volatility (1.99).
HMUS.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 87.92B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XDN0.L trades at $4,130.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 87.33B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while WQDS.L trades at $536.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs COMM.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while COMM.L trades at $538.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 86.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while EQDS.L trades at $541.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CRPX.L trades at $12,779.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 83.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XLKQ.L trades at $49,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 82.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while XDEB.L trades at $3,582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 82.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while CSP1.L trades at $45,737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
HMUS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMUS.L stands at 2.54B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 82.35B. Regarding current trading prices, HMUS.L is priced at $4,160.00, while IGUS.L trades at $13,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMUS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, HMUS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMUS.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMUS.L.