Hamlin Bank and Trust Company
Hamlin Bank and Trust Company HMLN Peers
See (HMLN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMLN | $188.00 | N/A | 70.97M | 25.30 | $7.43 | +6.38% |
| UNCRY | $31.39 | +1.88% | 199.66B | 9.26 | $3.39 | +2.45% |
| CAIXY | $2.74 | +1.86% | 175.53B | 8.84 | $0.31 | +4.32% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.54 | +1.35% | 155.62B | 8.11 | $3.89 | +4.31% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 129.53B | 6.61 | $0.77 | +5.44% |
| BNPQF | $90.90 | +3.77% | 102.68B | 8.46 | $10.74 | +6.14% |
| BNPQY | $45.01 | +1.63% | 101.89B | 8.38 | $5.37 | +5.51% |
| UNCFF | $64.37 | +2.32% | 100.26B | 9.49 | $6.78 | +3.69% |
| IITSF | $5.57 | +2.77% | 99.02B | 9.95 | $0.56 | +6.18% |
Stock Comparison
HMLN vs UNCRY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 199.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while UNCRY trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CAIXY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 175.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CAIXY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BKAYY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CIHKY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 155.62B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CIHKY trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and CIHKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs CIHHF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 129.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BNPQF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 102.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BNPQF trades at $90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and BNPQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs BNPQY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 101.89B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BNPQY trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs UNCFF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 100.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while UNCFF trades at $64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs IITSF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 99.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while IITSF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs DBSDF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 98.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while DBSDF trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs DBSDY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 96.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while DBSDY trades at $136.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs SBKFF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 96.00B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and SBKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs KBCSY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 75.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while KBCSY trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PBCRY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 69.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PBCRY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs AKSJF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs MZHOF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 65.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while MZHOF trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PBCRF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 64.23B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PBCRF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs EBKDY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 63.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while EBKDY trades at $40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs LLDTF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CRARY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CRARY trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs LLOBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 57.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CRARF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 57.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CRARF trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and CRARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs OVCHY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while OVCHY trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs OVCHF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while OVCHF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CIXPF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 56.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CIXPF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CHBJF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 56.03B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CHBJF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PSBKF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 55.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PSBKF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CHCJY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 54.07B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CHCJY trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs NRDBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 48.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while NRDBY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs NBNKF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while NBNKF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs UOVEF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.19B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs STNDF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs UOVEY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.41B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while UOVEY trades at $54.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BHKLY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 44.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BHKLY trades at $84.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BNKHF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.29B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BNKHF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs SCGLY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 41.89B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SCGLY trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs DNBBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.00B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while DNBBF trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BKRKF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 38.88B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKRKF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and BKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs SCGLF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SCGLF trades at $54.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs DNBBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 38.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while DNBBY trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BKRKY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 37.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKRKY trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs KBCSF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 36.96B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while KBCSF trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CWESF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CRZBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CRZBF trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CRZBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CRZBY trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs JPSTF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and JPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs JPPTY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs SVKEF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 32.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SVKEF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs EBKOF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while EBKOF trades at $82.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and EBKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs CEBCF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and CEBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs DNKEY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while DNKEY trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BDORY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 30.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BDORY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs JPHLF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs JPPHY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 29.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while JPPHY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and JPPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs MLYNF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs MLYBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while MLYBY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and MLYBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs SWDBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 28.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SWDBF trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and SWDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs SWDBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 28.79B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SWDBY trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CMAKY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 28.41B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CMAKY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PPERY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 28.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PPERY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs DNSKF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PPERF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 27.72B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PPERF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and PPERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs HSNGY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while HSNGY trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PSZKF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 27.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PSZKF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PSZKY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 26.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PSZKY trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs FCNCB Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 26.29B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while FCNCB trades at $1,680.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and FCNCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs GBOOF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while GBOOF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and GBOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs GBOOY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24.79B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while GBOOY trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs HSNGF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs BLMIF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.62B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BLMIF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and BLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs CKHGY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CKHGY trades at $95.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BPXXY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs SGBLY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 20.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SGBLY trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BKHYY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 20.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKHYY trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and BKHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs CGMBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CGMBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and CGMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs MDIBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.57B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while MDIBY trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CKHGF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CMTDF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 18.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CMTDF trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and CMTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs RSNHF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while RSNHF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and RSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs SUTNY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SUTNY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs SBGOF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 18.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SBGOF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and SBGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs CRDIY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs PBLOF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and PBLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs BKHPF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs GPFOF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs ISNPY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while ISNPY trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs AIBGY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while AIBGY trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BDOUF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs GPFOY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs AIBRF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while AIBRF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and AIBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs SKCBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs VLYPN Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while VLYPN trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs SUGBY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BNCZF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs OTPBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMLN vs MDIBF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BKRIF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKRIF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs BKRIY Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.89B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while BKRIY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.
HMLN vs CIMDF Comparison
HMLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLN stands at 70.97M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLN is priced at $188.00, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLN currently has a P/E ratio of 25.30, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, HMLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLN is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLN.