Hugoton Royalty Trust
Hugoton Royalty Trust HGTXU Peers
See (HGTXU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGTXU | $0.42 | +1.22% | 16.60M | 20.75 | $0.02 | N/A |
MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175.45B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +4.00% |
NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.78B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
WOPEF | $15.73 | +6.50% | 29.81B | 8.41 | $1.87 | +7.79% |
TRMLF | $46.47 | -0.71% | 17.39B | 19.20 | $2.42 | +4.72% |
DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 16.99B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
PEXNY | $8.26 | -2.82% | 16.40B | 7.06 | $1.17 | +6.72% |
IPXHY | $12.92 | +0.15% | 15.47B | 5.32 | $2.43 | +3.28% |
IPXHF | $12.85 | N/A | 15.39B | 5.42 | $2.37 | +3.96% |
SSLZY | $4.09 | -2.55% | 13.25B | 10.76 | $0.38 | +2.17% |
Stock Comparison
HGTXU vs MEYYY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs NSTKF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs WOPEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 29.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while WOPEF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs TRMLF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.39B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while TRMLF trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs DETNF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PEXNY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PEXNY trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs IPXHY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 15.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while IPXHY trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs IPXHF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 15.39B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while IPXHF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs SSLZY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 13.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while SSLZY trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs STOSF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while STOSF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs AETUF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while AETUF trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs NOVKY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PTRRY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PTRRY trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs VSOGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs DKDRF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while DKDRF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PREKF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PREKF trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs MEGEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while MEGEF trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs SPGYF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while SPGYF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PMOIF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PMOIF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -24.80. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs HBRIY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while HBRIY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs DELKY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while DELKY trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs DLKGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while DLKGF trades at $170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs OASPW Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PEYUF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PEYUF trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs EERGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs BTEGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs JPTXF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while JPTXF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs BEPTF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while BEPTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs NUVSF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while NUVSF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PRMRF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PRMRF trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ATHOF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ATHOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs BCHEY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while BCHEY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs IPCFF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while IPCFF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PTGIF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs FRHLF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while FRHLF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs AAVVF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while AAVVF trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs BIREF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while BIREF trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs EFVIF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CRCQW Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs WLLAW Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs DTNOF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while DTNOF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CDDRF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CDDRF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs KWTEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 982.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while KWTEF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs UNEGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs KELTF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 896.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while KELTF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PARXF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 894.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PARXF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs AOIFF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 890.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while AOIFF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CWEGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs KRNGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 857.12M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while KRNGF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs BWEFF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 807.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while BWEFF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs KRNGY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 771.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while KRNGY trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CRLFF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 713.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CRLFF trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PTHRF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 657.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PTHRF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs EEENF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, EEENF has a market cap of 636.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while EEENF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EEENF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEENF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to EEENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs SQZZF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 613.12M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while SQZZF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs AAGEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs GFKSY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs RCKHF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 475.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while RCKHF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs GUKYF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 453.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while GUKYF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 69.67. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs TBNRF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs DALXF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 400.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while DALXF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs SHASF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 398.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while SHASF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PTALF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 391.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PTALF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs BKBEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.22M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ZPTAF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 382.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ZPTAF trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs COPJF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.20M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PRYGF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PEGIY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CEIEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 324.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CEIEF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ENQUF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316.04M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ATUUF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 295.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ATUUF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -53.55. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs TUWLF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 292.18M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while TUWLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PESAF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 282.55M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs FECCF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 280.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while FECCF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs OILSF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 258.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while OILSF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs GEGYY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 242.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs GEGYF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 236.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs TUWOY Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 229.94M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while TUWOY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs EXCE Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 216.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while EXCE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs HZNFF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.29M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ITEEF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PSHIF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs HRCXF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 183.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CRNZF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CRNZF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs RECWF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs SEUSF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 168.76M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while SEUSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs GASXF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 163.69M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while GASXF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs TGRO Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, TGRO has a market cap of 161.44M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while TGRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas TGRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to TGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ZNOG Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 161.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ZNOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -15.61. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PNWRF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs KGEIF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 154.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs IPOOF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 149.60M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while IPOOF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs ALVOF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 148.44M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while ALVOF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PIFYF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 145.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PIFYF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs CVONF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs EEGUF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 138.86M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while EEGUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs SLGYF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 134.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs LNDNF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 125.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while LNDNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.
HGTXU vs PTRUF Comparison
HGTXU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGTXU stands at 16.60M. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 122.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HGTXU is priced at $0.42, while PTRUF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGTXU currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 95.65. In terms of profitability, HGTXU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGTXU is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGTXU.