Global Technologies, Ltd.
Global Technologies, Ltd. GTLL Peers
See (GTLL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLL | $0.00 | +20.00% | 3.67M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HTHIF | $26.92 | +1.57% | 123.24B | 29.26 | $0.92 | +1.15% |
| MSBHF | $19.30 | -1.66% | 76.77B | 11.91 | $1.62 | +3.58% |
| MTSUY | $19.25 | +0.31% | 76.57B | 11.88 | $1.62 | +2.84% |
| ITOCF | $51.00 | -1.60% | 72.31B | 12.09 | $4.22 | +2.66% |
| ITOCY | $101.70 | -2.05% | 72.09B | 12.05 | $8.44 | N/A |
| HTHIY | $26.10 | -1.02% | 59.74B | 28.37 | $0.92 | +2.24% |
| MITSF | $19.99 | +1.22% | 57.46B | 9.38 | $2.13 | +3.39% |
| MITSY | $394.80 | -1.30% | 56.74B | 9.39 | $42.04 | +1.34% |
| CTPCY | $6.25 | -5.02% | 36.36B | 4.63 | $1.35 | +5.84% |
Stock Comparison
GTLL vs HTHIF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 123.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while HTHIF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MSBHF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 76.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MSBHF trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MTSUY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 76.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MTSUY trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ITOCF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 72.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ITOCF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ITOCY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 72.09B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ITOCY trades at $101.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs HTHIY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 59.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while HTHIY trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MITSF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 57.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MITSF trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MITSY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 56.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MITSY trades at $394.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CTPCY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 36.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CTPCY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CTPCF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 35.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CTPCF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SSUMF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SSUMF trades at $26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MARUF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 31.90B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MARUF trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MARUY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 31.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MARUY trades at $187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SSUMY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 30.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SSUMY trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs PITAF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 26.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while PITAF trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BLJZY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 25.65B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CKHUF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 22.02B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CKHUF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CKHUY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 21.98B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CKHUY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs TYHOF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs GPOVY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 15.96B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs GPOVF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while GPOVF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs HALMY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 15.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while HALMY trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs HLMAF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 15.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while HLMAF trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs JMHLY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 14.01B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while JMHLY trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -29.84. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KBDCY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KBDCY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs JARLF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 13.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while JARLF trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -28.36. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SWRBF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SWRBF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SWRAY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SWRAY trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KHOLY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KHOLY trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -133.27. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SWRAF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SWRAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KPELY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 9.37B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KPELY trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KPELF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KPELF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SCRPF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SCRPF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SKSUY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SKSUY trades at $80.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SEIBF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs HYUHF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MYTHF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 6.52B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MYTHF trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs AYYLF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SCVPF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs FCODF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while FCODF trades at $1,511.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MYTHY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MYTHY trades at $45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs AYALY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while AYALY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs JGSHF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BDVSF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BDVSF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SZHFF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KHEXF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BDVSY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BDVSY trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BJINF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BJINF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ALFFF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ALFFF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs FOSUY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while FOSUY trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KTERF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs FOSUF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KINUF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs AKAAF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while AKAAF trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SMGBF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SMGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs JGSMY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while JGSMY trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs NARRF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs GULRF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while GULRF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KBDCF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KBDCF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs GULRY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while GULRY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SWRBY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SWRBY trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs IWTNF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while IWTNF trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs TINLF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SGHIF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SGHIF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs NLTBF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while NLTBF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SGHIY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MMSMY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MMSMY trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CHCLY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs TINLY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while TINLY trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs NICFF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MPCFF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs XZJCF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BNHUF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ALGGY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ALGGY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BRYAF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 937.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BRYAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs GRGCF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 914.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while GRGCF trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs NSHBY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 831.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ALGGF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 723.55M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs MTLZF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 683.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SHMWF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 575.65M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SHMWF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs INDHF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 548.25M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while INDHF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs KKRAF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CVVIF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BEVFF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 323.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BEVFF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CEEIF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs TJSCF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 261.33M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while TJSCF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs HGRVF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs DMCHY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 219.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while DMCHY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs THAFF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs YMAIF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 139.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ICBT Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs PRTT Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 83.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while PRTT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs NOBGF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs APTL Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while APTL trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs RSDEF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 76.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs ECSL Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs BNIGF Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 48.33M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs CIBY Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 41.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while CIBY trades at $1,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -111.61. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.
GTLL vs SBOX Comparison
GTLL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLL stands at 3.67M. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 37.11M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLL is priced at $0.00, while SBOX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLL's ROE is +2.99%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLL is more volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLL.