Green Scientific Labs Holdings Inc.
Green Scientific Labs Holdings Inc. GSL.CN Peers
See (GSL.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
GSL.CN vs CURA.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CURA.CN has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CURA.CN trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CURA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CURA.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CURA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs BHC.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BHC.TO has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BHC.TO trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BHC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.35. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BHC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to BHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs VRNO.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, VRNO.CN has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while VRNO.CN trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VRNO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to VRNO.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to VRNO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs GTII.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, GTII.CN has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while GTII.CN trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GTII.CN's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to GTII.CN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to GTII.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs TRUL.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TRUL.CN has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TRUL.CN trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRUL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TRUL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TRUL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CRON.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CRON.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CRON.TO trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CRON.TO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CRON.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CRON.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CURA.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CURA.TO has a market cap of 860.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CURA.TO trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CURA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CURA.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CURA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs TER.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TER.CN has a market cap of 804.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TER.CN trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TER.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TER.CN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TER.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs DHT-UN.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, DHT-UN.TO has a market cap of 698.26M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while DHT-UN.TO trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DHT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to DHT-UN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to DHT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs TLRY.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TLRY.TO has a market cap of 645.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TLRY.TO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TLRY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TLRY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TLRY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs GUD.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, GUD.TO has a market cap of 582.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while GUD.TO trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GUD.TO's P/E ratio is 146.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to GUD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to GUD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs DHT-U.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, DHT-U.TO has a market cap of 464.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while DHT-U.TO trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DHT-U.TO's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to DHT-U.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and DHT-U.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs ACB.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, ACB.TO has a market cap of 388.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while ACB.TO trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ACB.TO's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to ACB.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to ACB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs WEED.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, WEED.TO has a market cap of 371.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while WEED.TO trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WEED.TO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to WEED.TO's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to WEED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs VRNO.NE Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, VRNO.NE has a market cap of 348.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while VRNO.NE trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VRNO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to VRNO.NE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to VRNO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CPH.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CPH.TO has a market cap of 338.10M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CPH.TO trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CPH.TO's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CPH.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CPH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CL.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CL.CN has a market cap of 333.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CL.CN trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CL.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CCHW.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CCHW.CN has a market cap of 228.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CCHW.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CCHW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CCHW.CN's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CCHW.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs OGI.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, OGI.TO has a market cap of 209.39M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while OGI.TO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OGI.TO's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to OGI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to OGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs TH.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TH.TO has a market cap of 169.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TH.TO trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TH.TO's P/E ratio is -36.85. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TH.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs TSND.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TSND.TO has a market cap of 146.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TSND.TO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TSND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TSND.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TSND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs HLS.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, HLS.TO has a market cap of 143.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while HLS.TO trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HLS.TO's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to HLS.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to HLS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs GRIN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, GRIN.CN has a market cap of 141.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while GRIN.CN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GRIN.CN's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to GRIN.CN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to GRIN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs BHSC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BHSC.CN has a market cap of 137.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BHSC.CN trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BHSC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BHSC.CN's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to BHSC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CRDL.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CRDL.TO has a market cap of 131.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CRDL.TO trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CRDL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CRDL.TO's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CRDL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs PLTH.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, PLTH.CN has a market cap of 117.10M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while PLTH.CN trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to PLTH.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and PLTH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs XLY.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, XLY.TO has a market cap of 111.61M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while XLY.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XLY.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to XLY.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to XLY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs JUSH.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, JUSH.CN has a market cap of 93.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while JUSH.CN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to JUSH.CN's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to JUSH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs GDNS.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, GDNS.CN has a market cap of 90.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while GDNS.CN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GDNS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to GDNS.CN's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and GDNS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs MDP.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MDP.TO has a market cap of 88.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MDP.TO trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MDP.TO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MDP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to MDP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs TGOD.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TGOD.CN has a market cap of 62.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TGOD.CN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TGOD.CN's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TGOD.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and TGOD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs BNXT.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BNXT.CN has a market cap of 55.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BNXT.CN trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BNXT.CN's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BNXT.CN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and BNXT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs STEM.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, STEM.CN has a market cap of 53.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while STEM.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STEM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to STEM.CN's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and STEM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs MRMD.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MRMD.CN has a market cap of 46.71M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MRMD.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MRMD.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MRMD.CN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to MRMD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs INNO.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, INNO.CN has a market cap of 46.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while INNO.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas INNO.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to INNO.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and INNO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs AYR-A.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AYR-A.CN has a market cap of 41.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AYR-A.CN trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AYR-A.CN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AYR-A.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to AYR-A.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs HEXO.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, HEXO.TO has a market cap of 38.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while HEXO.TO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HEXO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to HEXO.TO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to HEXO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs LABS.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, LABS.TO has a market cap of 37.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while LABS.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LABS.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to LABS.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to LABS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CHM.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CHM.CN has a market cap of 37.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CHM.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CHM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CHM.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CHM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CBST.NE Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CBST.NE has a market cap of 35.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CBST.NE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CBST.NE's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CBST.NE's ROE of -6.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CBST.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs IAN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, IAN.CN has a market cap of 33.73M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while IAN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IAN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to IAN.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and IAN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs EPIC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, EPIC.CN has a market cap of 29.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while EPIC.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EPIC.CN's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to EPIC.CN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and EPIC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs VEXT.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, VEXT.CN has a market cap of 28.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while VEXT.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to VEXT.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to VEXT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs AVCN.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AVCN.TO has a market cap of 27.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AVCN.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AVCN.TO's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AVCN.TO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to AVCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs MMEN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MMEN.CN has a market cap of 27.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MMEN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MMEN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MMEN.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to MMEN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs GWAY.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, GWAY.CN has a market cap of 24.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while GWAY.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GWAY.CN's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to GWAY.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to GWAY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CXXI.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CXXI.CN has a market cap of 23.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CXXI.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CXXI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CXXI.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CXXI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs YOUR.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, YOUR.CN has a market cap of 22.94M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while YOUR.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YOUR.CN's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to YOUR.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and YOUR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs VIN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, VIN.CN has a market cap of 20.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while VIN.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VIN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to VIN.CN's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GSL.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and VIN.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
GSL.CN vs RWB.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, RWB.CN has a market cap of 18.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while RWB.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RWB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to RWB.CN's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to RWB.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CWEB.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CWEB.TO has a market cap of 17.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CWEB.TO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CWEB.TO's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CWEB.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CWEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs MRV.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MRV.TO has a market cap of 15.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MRV.TO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MRV.TO's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MRV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to MRV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs EXM.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, EXM.CN has a market cap of 15.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while EXM.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EXM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to EXM.CN's ROE of -18.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and EXM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CHAL.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CHAL.CN has a market cap of 14.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CHAL.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CHAL.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CHAL.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CHAL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs RIV.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, RIV.CN has a market cap of 13.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while RIV.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RIV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to RIV.CN's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and RIV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs RVV.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, RVV.CN has a market cap of 12.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while RVV.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RVV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to RVV.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and RVV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs TRIP.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TRIP.CN has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TRIP.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRIP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TRIP.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TRIP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs ORI.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, ORI.CN has a market cap of 11.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while ORI.CN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ORI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to ORI.CN's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and ORI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs PWR.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, PWR.CN has a market cap of 11.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while PWR.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PWR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to PWR.CN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and PWR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CLC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CLC.CN has a market cap of 11.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CLC.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CLC.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CLC.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CLC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CTX.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CTX.TO has a market cap of 10.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CTX.TO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CTX.TO's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CTX.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to CTX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs CNFA.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CNFA.CN has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CNFA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CNFA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CNFA.CN's ROE of -7.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CNFA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs AVNT.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AVNT.TO has a market cap of 9.74M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AVNT.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AVNT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AVNT.TO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and AVNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs VIVO.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, VIVO.TO has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while VIVO.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VIVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to VIVO.TO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to VIVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs AUSA.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AUSA.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AUSA.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AUSA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AUSA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and AUSA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs OILS.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, OILS.CN has a market cap of 9.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while OILS.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OILS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to OILS.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to OILS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs MVMD.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MVMD.CN has a market cap of 8.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MVMD.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MVMD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MVMD.CN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and MVMD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs AH.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AH.TO has a market cap of 8.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AH.TO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AH.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AH.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to AH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs STHZ.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, STHZ.CN has a market cap of 7.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while STHZ.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STHZ.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to STHZ.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and STHZ.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs MOJO.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MOJO.CN has a market cap of 7.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MOJO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MOJO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MOJO.CN's ROE of -11.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and MOJO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs SPR.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, SPR.CN has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while SPR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SPR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to SPR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and SPR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs IMCC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, IMCC.CN has a market cap of 7.25M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while IMCC.CN trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IMCC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to IMCC.CN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and IMCC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CLSH.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CLSH.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CLSH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CLSH.CN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CLSH.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CLSH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CDVA.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CDVA.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CDVA.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CDVA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CDVA.CN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CDVA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs SE.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, SE.CN has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while SE.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SE.CN's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to SE.CN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to SE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs MYCO.NE Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MYCO.NE has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MYCO.NE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MYCO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MYCO.NE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to MYCO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs SNN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, SNN.CN has a market cap of 6.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while SNN.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SNN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to SNN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and SNN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs TILT.NE Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, TILT.NE has a market cap of 5.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while TILT.NE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TILT.NE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to TILT.NE's ROE of -10.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to TILT.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs FH.NE Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, FH.NE has a market cap of 5.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while FH.NE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FH.NE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to FH.NE's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and FH.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs WLLW.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, WLLW.TO has a market cap of 5.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while WLLW.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WLLW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to WLLW.TO's ROE of -21.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and WLLW.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs BCBC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BCBC.CN has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BCBC.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BCBC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BCBC.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to BCBC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs AYUR.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AYUR.CN has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AYUR.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AYUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AYUR.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and AYUR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CANN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CANN.CN has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CANN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CANN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CANN.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CANN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs BHNG.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BHNG.CN has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BHNG.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BHNG.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BHNG.CN's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and BHNG.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs LOBE.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, LOBE.CN has a market cap of 4.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while LOBE.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LOBE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to LOBE.CN's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and LOBE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs FFNT.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, FFNT.CN has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while FFNT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FFNT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to FFNT.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and FFNT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs LUFF.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, LUFF.CN has a market cap of 4.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while LUFF.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LUFF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to LUFF.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GSL.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
GSL.CN vs BBM.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BBM.CN has a market cap of 3.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BBM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BBM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BBM.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to BBM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs BAMM.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, BAMM.CN has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while BAMM.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BAMM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to BAMM.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and BAMM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs RMC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, RMC.CN has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while RMC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RMC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to RMC.CN's ROE of +8.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and RMC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs THC.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, THC.CN has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while THC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas THC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to THC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and THC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs NBUD.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, NBUD.CN has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while NBUD.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NBUD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to NBUD.CN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and NBUD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs MSVN.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, MSVN.CN has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while MSVN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MSVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to MSVN.CN's ROE of +19.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and MSVN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs AREV.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, AREV.CN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while AREV.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AREV.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to AREV.CN's ROE of +2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and AREV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs ASP.TO Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, ASP.TO has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while ASP.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ASP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to ASP.TO's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and ASP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs CFT.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, CFT.CN has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while CFT.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CFT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to CFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and CFT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs IPOT.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, IPOT.CN has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while IPOT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IPOT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to IPOT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and IPOT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GSL.CN vs XBRA.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, XBRA.CN has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while XBRA.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XBRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to XBRA.CN's ROE of -20.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN is less volatile compared to XBRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSL.CN.
GSL.CN vs PBF.CN Comparison
GSL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSL.CN stands at 847528.00. In comparison, PBF.CN has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, GSL.CN is priced at $0.06, while PBF.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PBF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GSL.CN's ROE is -2.54%, compared to PBF.CN's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSL.CN and PBF.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSL.CN | $0.06 | N/A | 847528.00 | -0.10 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| CURA.CN | $5.22 | +9.21% | 4.07B | -6.07 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| BHC.TO | $6.69 | +4.86% | 2.47B | -39.35 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| VRNO.CN | $6.32 | +6.76% | 2.17B | -5.40 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| GTII.CN | $7.65 | -0.39% | 1.82B | 18.66 | $0.41 | N/A |
| TRUL.CN | $6.05 | -0.17% | 1.16B | -5.55 | -$1.09 | N/A |
| CRON.TO | $2.86 | +3.62% | 1.10B | 19.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CURA.TO | $1.14 | +0.88% | 860.37M | -2.65 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| TER.CN | $2.38 | -0.42% | 804.79M | -1.33 | -$1.79 | N/A |
| DHT-UN.TO | $12.40 | +0.40% | 698.26M | -155.00 | -$0.08 | +7.70% |