Grafenia Plc
Grafenia Plc GRA.L Peers
See (GRA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRA.L | $11.50 | +6.98% | 44.86M | -11.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| 0HYJ.L | $216.90 | +0.74% | 87.58B | 19.20 | $11.29 | +0.70% |
| 0II3.L | $273.41 | -0.68% | 33.96B | 44.24 | $6.18 | +0.57% |
| 0QMI.L | $2,301.00 | +0.65% | 15.86B | 28.13 | $81.79 | +3.77% |
| 0HHB.L | $39.31 | +2.06% | 10.30B | 69.20 | $0.57 | +0.77% |
| RTO.L | $349.80 | +0.37% | 8.79B | 29.15 | $0.12 | +2.60% |
| ITRK.L | $4,936.00 | +1.52% | 7.87B | 23.17 | $2.13 | +2.59% |
| 0KX9.L | $47.87 | +6.21% | 4.65B | 8.11 | $5.90 | +4.56% |
| 0KGY.L | $242.00 | -9.36% | 4.49B | 21.02 | $11.51 | +1.18% |
| 0QQE.L | $64.40 | +1.10% | 4.18B | 18.72 | $3.44 | +3.65% |
Stock Comparison
GRA.L vs 0HYJ.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0HYJ.L has a market cap of 87.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0HYJ.L trades at $216.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0HYJ.L's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0HYJ.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0HYJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0II3.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0II3.L has a market cap of 33.96B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0II3.L trades at $273.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0II3.L's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0II3.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0II3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0QMI.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0QMI.L has a market cap of 15.86B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0QMI.L trades at $2,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0QMI.L's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0QMI.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0QMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0HHB.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0HHB.L has a market cap of 10.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0HHB.L trades at $39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0HHB.L's P/E ratio is 69.20. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0HHB.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and 0HHB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs RTO.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, RTO.L has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while RTO.L trades at $349.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas RTO.L's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RTO.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to RTO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs ITRK.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, ITRK.L has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while ITRK.L trades at $4,936.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas ITRK.L's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ITRK.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to ITRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0KX9.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0KX9.L has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0KX9.L trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0KX9.L's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0KX9.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0KX9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0KGY.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0KGY.L has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0KGY.L trades at $242.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0KGY.L's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0KGY.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and 0KGY.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs 0QQE.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0QQE.L has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0QQE.L trades at $64.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0QQE.L's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0QQE.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0QQE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs IWG.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, IWG.L has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while IWG.L trades at $189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas IWG.L's P/E ratio is 189.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IWG.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to IWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs MTO.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, MTO.L has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while MTO.L trades at $151.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MTO.L's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MTO.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to MTO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs SRP.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, SRP.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while SRP.L trades at $173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SRP.L's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SRP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to SRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0DZJ.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0DZJ.L has a market cap of 750.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0DZJ.L trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0DZJ.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0DZJ.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and 0DZJ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs 0HDQ.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0HDQ.L has a market cap of 714.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0HDQ.L trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0HDQ.L's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0HDQ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and 0HDQ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs 0IX0.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0IX0.L has a market cap of 681.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0IX0.L trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0IX0.L's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0IX0.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and 0IX0.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs JSG.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, JSG.L has a market cap of 584.65M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while JSG.L trades at $141.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas JSG.L's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to JSG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to JSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs HYVE.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, HYVE.L has a market cap of 351.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while HYVE.L trades at $120.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas HYVE.L's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to HYVE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and HYVE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs DWF.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, DWF.L has a market cap of 341.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while DWF.L trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas DWF.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DWF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to DWF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs RST.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, RST.L has a market cap of 335.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while RST.L trades at $247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas RST.L's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RST.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to RST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs RWS.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, RWS.L has a market cap of 310.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while RWS.L trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas RWS.L's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RWS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to RWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs FRAN.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, FRAN.L has a market cap of 289.94M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while FRAN.L trades at $151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas FRAN.L's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to FRAN.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to FRAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs DLAR.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, DLAR.L has a market cap of 253.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while DLAR.L trades at $129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas DLAR.L's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DLAR.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to DLAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs CPI.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, CPI.L has a market cap of 251.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while CPI.L trades at $220.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CPI.L's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CPI.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to CPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0QME.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0QME.L has a market cap of 197.96M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0QME.L trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0QME.L's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0QME.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0QME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs KEYS.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, KEYS.L has a market cap of 181.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while KEYS.L trades at $574.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas KEYS.L's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to KEYS.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to KEYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0RQI.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0RQI.L has a market cap of 169.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0RQI.L trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0RQI.L's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0RQI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0RQI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs PPHC.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, PPHC.L has a market cap of 165.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while PPHC.L trades at $134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas PPHC.L's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PPHC.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and PPHC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs BEG.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, BEG.L has a market cap of 159.73M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while BEG.L trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas BEG.L's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BEG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to BEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs KGH.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, KGH.L has a market cap of 145.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while KGH.L trades at $169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas KGH.L's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to KGH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to KGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs SFT.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, SFT.L has a market cap of 117.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while SFT.L trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas SFT.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SFT.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to SFT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs INSE.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, INSE.L has a market cap of 110.96M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while INSE.L trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas INSE.L's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to INSE.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to INSE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs 0RNP.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, 0RNP.L has a market cap of 90.84M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while 0RNP.L trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas 0RNP.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to 0RNP.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to 0RNP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs WATR.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, WATR.L has a market cap of 66.74M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while WATR.L trades at $350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas WATR.L's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to WATR.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to WATR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs CTG.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, CTG.L has a market cap of 31.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while CTG.L trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CTG.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CTG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to CTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs VNET.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, VNET.L has a market cap of 22.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while VNET.L trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas VNET.L's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VNET.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to VNET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs MIND.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, MIND.L has a market cap of 20.55M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while MIND.L trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas MIND.L's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MIND.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to MIND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs INCE.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, INCE.L has a market cap of 18.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while INCE.L trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas INCE.L's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to INCE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and INCE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs REAT.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, REAT.L has a market cap of 16.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while REAT.L trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas REAT.L's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to REAT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to REAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs DSW.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, DSW.L has a market cap of 12.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while DSW.L trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas DSW.L's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DSW.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to DSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs CPP.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, CPP.L has a market cap of 7.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while CPP.L trades at $81.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CPP.L's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CPP.L's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L and CPP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GRA.L vs CEPS.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, CEPS.L has a market cap of 4.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while CEPS.L trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas CEPS.L's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CEPS.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to CEPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.
GRA.L vs RBGP.L Comparison
GRA.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRA.L stands at 44.86M. In comparison, RBGP.L has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.L is priced at $11.50, while RBGP.L trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.50, whereas RBGP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GRA.L's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RBGP.L's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.L is less volatile compared to RBGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.L.