GHST World Inc.
GHST World Inc. GHST Peers
See (GHST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHST | $0.04 | -31.60% | 5.08M | 1.95 | $0.02 | N/A |
| BABAF | $15.54 | -1.51% | 297.67B | 18.07 | $0.86 | +1.33% |
| MPNGF | $17.68 | +3.15% | 107.99B | 22.66 | $0.78 | N/A |
| MPNGY | $33.50 | -2.67% | 103.17B | 21.34 | $1.57 | N/A |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | N/A | 52.08B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | N/A |
| JDCMF | $19.48 | +17.00% | 50.40B | 9.50 | $2.05 | +2.57% |
| ANCTF | $49.35 | -0.54% | 46.79B | 18.14 | $2.72 | +1.08% |
| YAHOY | $7.12 | -0.49% | 25.38B | 25.43 | $0.28 | N/A |
| RKUNF | $6.02 | -2.90% | 12.99B | -9.87 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| NCLTY | $10.56 | -0.12% | 11.93B | 22.96 | $0.46 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
GHST vs BABAF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 297.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BABAF trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MPNGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 107.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MPNGF trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MPNGY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 103.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MPNGY trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs XXLLY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 52.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JDCMF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 50.40B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JDCMF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ANCTF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 46.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ANCTF trades at $49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs YAHOY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 25.38B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while YAHOY trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs RKUNF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while RKUNF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs NCLTY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 11.93B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while NCLTY trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs NCLTF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while NCLTF trades at $103.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs RKUNY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while RKUNY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MONOY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 10.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MONOY trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 54.53. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SRTTY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SRTTY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SATLF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SATLF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SNROF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SNROF trades at $40.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HKTGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ZLNDY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 8.97B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ZLNDY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MTTRY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 8.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MTTRY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DELHY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DELHY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ZLDSF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 8.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ZLDSF trades at $31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DUFRY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.69B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DUFRY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 66.25. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DLVHF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DLVHF trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs PETRY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DFRYF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DFRYF trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 62.59. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JBHIF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MONOF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MONOF trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs CDNAF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 6.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while CDNAF trades at $118.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ELPQF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ELPQF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ALEGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ALEGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JDSPY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JDSPY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JDDSF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JDDSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs CDNTF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while CDNTF trades at $149.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SAXJY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SAXJY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JTKWY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JTKWY trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs TKAYF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while TKAYF trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SDIPF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SDIPF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ZLPSF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JUMSF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ZOPLY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DNLMY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DNLMY trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DROOF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DROOF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs JUMSY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while JUMSY trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HNORY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MRCIF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MRCIF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MCARY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MCARY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs FHNGY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while FHNGY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs YMDAF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while YMDAF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs GRUPF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs DSITF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while DSITF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs PAHGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while PAHGF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs BTOOY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs WHTPF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while WHTPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 200.67. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MIZUF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MIZUF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs GPGNF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while GPGNF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MTAGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MTAGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs LEFUF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while LEFUF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MGLUY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MGLUY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MKRMF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs FNXTF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 987.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SCCAF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 874.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ACEHF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 684.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ACEHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HWGC Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs THGHY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs THGPF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 535.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while THGPF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ASOMY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 506.54M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ASOMY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HLFDY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 500.20M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HLFDY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs CRFCF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 485.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while CRFCF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HLFDF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 463.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs KGGNF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs BHOOY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 426.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BHOOY trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ASOMF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 420.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs BHHOF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs KTYCF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 278.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while KTYCF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 79.18. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SSILF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 251.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SSILF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs NBRNF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.29M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HMAGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs HKTVY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 215.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while HKTVY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs YUMSF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 187.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while YUMSF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs RDBBY Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs BNNNF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs GMELF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 118.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs AHAHF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs WCRS Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 95.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while WCRS trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs IGDFF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 74.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while IGDFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs BJURF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 71.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BJURF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs MHCRF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs SPGZ Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GHST has daily volatility of 22.75 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.
GHST vs ADBGF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs IDGBF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs PXHI Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 47.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while PXHI trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs ARTZF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs GLHD Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs CNVAF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 37.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs FDIT Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs RDBBF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while RDBBF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs TWRKF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 22.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs RLAB Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while RLAB trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs BWTL Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 14.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while BWTL trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.87. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.
GHST vs AVDWF Comparison
GHST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHST stands at 5.08M. In comparison, AVDWF has a market cap of 9.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GHST is priced at $0.04, while AVDWF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHST currently has a P/E ratio of 1.95, whereas AVDWF's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, GHST's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AVDWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHST is more volatile compared to AVDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHST.