FutureLand, Corp.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 37.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CBRE trades at $126.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 31.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CSGP trades at $74.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 266.32. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 27.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VONOY trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 27.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VNNVF trades at $33.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -26.49. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 27.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CLNXF trades at $39.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -653.17. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 18.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SURDF trades at $38.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 16.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SURYY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SWPFF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 11.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while IFSUF trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 10.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while JLL trades at $229.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CLILF trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 8.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while WRFRF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 66.63. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 7.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FSV trades at $173.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 60.21. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BEKE trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HULCF trades at $8.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ESRCF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LEGIF trades at $86.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 86.79. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NXDCF trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -201.20. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CIGI trades at $123.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 5.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NMEHF trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NMEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BPYPP trades at $14.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BPYPO trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BPYPN trades at $13.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HLPPF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HLPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SSSAF trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CWSRF trades at $13.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 219.54. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HLPPY trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TYTMF trades at $16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TCN trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SSHLY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FBGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AANNF trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VGPBF trades at $92.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while IWGFF trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CTRGF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CGSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CWK trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TAGOF trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CNPPF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NMRK trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GRGTF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TAGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to WIHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SRRLF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GRNNF trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ASGTF trades at $39.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is -3940.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ASGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SVLPF trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DUSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LGMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RLGY trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ICHIF trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MEQYF trades at $139.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while EXPI trades at $7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -82.89. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MMI trades at $29.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -175.47. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RDFN trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VIBVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PGRU trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ACNDF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 993.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SVAUF trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -38.83. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 972.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while EVGPF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 852.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while KW trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 844.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while REAX trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 801.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HYSNY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 312.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 708.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while INDT trades at $66.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while QK trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 521.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FRPH trades at $27.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 80.43. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 513.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 488.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while OPEN trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GBCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to KWLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 457.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RMR trades at $14.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to JPPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SHMSF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 399.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HOUS trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 387.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LSLPF trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 323.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MDTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 316.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FXTGY trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 311.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SOHOF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 305.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RMAX trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 295.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MLP trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -39.45. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 285.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TCI trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 48.53. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 270.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NEN trades at $77.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 257.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FLJ trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MDPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 250.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NTPIF trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 242.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SEG trades at $19.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CIAN trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SDWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FCRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 162.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DOUG trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 153.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TPRP trades at $25,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 463.64. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 135.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 133.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DLMI trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 104.21M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AZLCZ trades at $1,145.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 100.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while OJOC trades at $360.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 44.92. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 96.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BREUF trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 91.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BVERS trades at $3,685.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BVERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 91.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MHIVF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DOMA trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 86.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while STHO trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 82.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ASPS trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.21M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MAYS trades at $39.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -306.08. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CRSS trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 67.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LODE trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 63.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CPTP trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 60.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PKTEF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 50.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RFL trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while WE trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ADPPF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +5.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 39.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TNHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 39.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while XHG trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CHG trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 33.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MDICF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MDICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 29.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while OPAD trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 29.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AIRE trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LGYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 25.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ABCP trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 23.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FTHM trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 21.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 19.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MNGGF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DIVVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BCKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 16.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GYRO trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LEJU trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 14.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TRPTF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TRPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MGAG trades at $300.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while WETH trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 10.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ASPZ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 8.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DUO trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PRPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 7.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while OMH trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 6.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ALBT trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MBHCF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MBHCF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBHCF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MBHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LRHC trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRHC's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AVCO trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FGNV has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FGNV trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGNV's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGNV's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FGNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ZDPY has a market cap of 4.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ZDPY trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDPY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ZDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GBR trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -87.59. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 3.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while UOKA trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UOKA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MDCN has a market cap of 2.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MDCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDCN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MDCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MDJH trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SFR trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, WEWKQ has a market cap of 1.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while WEWKQ trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEWKQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEWKQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to WEWKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, XMEX has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while XMEX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEX's ROE of +2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to XMEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MSPC has a market cap of 934721.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MSPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSPC's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 826463.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while UK trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BRST has a market cap of 699392.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BRST trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRST's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRST's ROE of -6.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BRST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, RDCO has a market cap of 478345.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while RDCO trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCO's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to RDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AGGHF has a market cap of 472353.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AGGHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AGGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, USNL has a market cap of 418025.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while USNL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to USNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ENTI has a market cap of 299010.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ENTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENTI's ROE of +10.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ENTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AOXY has a market cap of 296366.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AOXY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TMRR has a market cap of 200765.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TMRR trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMRR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TMRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, UBYH has a market cap of 113747.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while UBYH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBYH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBYH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to UBYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LEJUY has a market cap of 55136.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LEJUY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEJUY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEJUY's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LEJUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, VTNA has a market cap of 46697.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while VTNA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTNA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTNA's ROE of -11.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to VTNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, USTC has a market cap of 42032.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while USTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USTC's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to USTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, DPWW has a market cap of 26133.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while DPWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to DPWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MBLV has a market cap of 21455.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MBLV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBLV's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is less volatile compared to MBLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TAYO has a market cap of 18080.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TAYO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAYO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAYO's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PRRE has a market cap of 15600.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PRRE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 12510.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, STHC has a market cap of 11406.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while STHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STHC's ROE of +8.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to STHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NOXL has a market cap of 7997.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NOXL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOXL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NOXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MSTO has a market cap of 6479.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MSTO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSTO's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to MSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, AGTK has a market cap of 5436.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while AGTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to AGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, SFRT has a market cap of 4826.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while SFRT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to SFRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, MHPC has a market cap of 3748.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while MHPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHPC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is less volatile compared to MHPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, ACAN has a market cap of 2439.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while ACAN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACAN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to ACAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, HHBT has a market cap of 1406.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while HHBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHBT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to HHBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, PGAI has a market cap of 1064.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while PGAI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGAI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGAI's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to PGAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 237.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LGPS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, XXFPL has a market cap of 223.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while XXFPL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXFPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXFPL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL and XXFPL have similar daily volatility (196.04).

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, CRXPF has a market cap of 110.00. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while CRXPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRXPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRXPF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to CRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LMRKN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, IRCP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while IRCP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, FTXGF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while FTXGF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTXGF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to FTXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LMRKO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, TESLU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while TESLU trades at $155.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TESLU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TESLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to TESLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, OBAS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while OBAS trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, NTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while NTP trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BPY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BPY trades at $18.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GORL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GORL trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GORL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GORL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, GWYGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while GWYGU trades at $80.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWYGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWYGU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to GWYGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, BRMSY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while BRMSY trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRMSY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRMSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to BRMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LMRK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LMRK trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.

FUTL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTL stands at 671626.00. In comparison, LMRKP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FUTL is priced at $0.00, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FUTL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTL is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTL.