The First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky
The First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky FSDK Peers
See (FSDK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSDK | $63.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UNCRY | $31.53 | +0.45% | 196.45B | 9.41 | $3.35 | +2.44% |
| CAIXY | $2.79 | +1.82% | 179.67B | 9.00 | $0.31 | +4.42% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.34 | +0.32% | 157.79B | 8.10 | $3.87 | +4.33% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 129.53B | 6.61 | $0.77 | +5.44% |
| UNCFF | $64.80 | +2.67% | 100.94B | 9.60 | $6.75 | +3.75% |
| IITSF | $5.66 | +2.54% | 100.62B | 10.11 | $0.56 | +6.08% |
| BNPQF | $88.91 | +3.34% | 100.42B | 8.44 | $10.54 | +6.27% |
| DBSDY | $139.88 | +0.03% | 99.44B | 6.49 | $21.54 | +4.68% |
Stock Comparison
FSDK vs UNCRY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 196.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while UNCRY trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CAIXY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 179.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CAIXY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BKAYY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CIHKY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 157.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CIHKY trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CIHHF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 129.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs UNCFF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 100.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while UNCFF trades at $64.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs IITSF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 100.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while IITSF trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BNPQF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 100.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BNPQF trades at $88.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs DBSDY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 99.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while DBSDY trades at $139.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs DBSDF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 97.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while DBSDF trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BNPQY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 94.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BNPQY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SBKFF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs KBCSY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 75.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while KBCSY trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs PBCRY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 69.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PBCRY trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs MZHOF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 67.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while MZHOF trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs AKSJF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs PBCRF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 65.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PBCRF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and PBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs EBKDY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while EBKDY trades at $40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs LLDTF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs LLOBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 59.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CRARF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 58.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CRARF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and CRARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs CRARY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CRARY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs PSBKF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 58.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PSBKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CHCJY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 56.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CHCJY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and CHCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs OVCHF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while OVCHF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CIXPF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 55.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CIXPF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs OVCHY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 55.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while OVCHY trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CHBJF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and CHBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs NRDBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while NRDBY trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs NBNKF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while NBNKF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs UOVEF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs STNDF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs UOVEY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while UOVEY trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BHKLY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 45.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BHKLY trades at $86.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BNKHF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BNKHF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SCGLY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SCGLY trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs DNBBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while DNBBF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs DNBBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 39.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while DNBBY trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BKRKY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 39.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKRKY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SCGLF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SCGLF trades at $54.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BKRKF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 37.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKRKF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs KBCSF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 36.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while KBCSF trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs SVKEF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CWESF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CRZBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CRZBF trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs JPSTF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and JPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs CRZBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CRZBY trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs JPPTY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs EBKOF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while EBKOF trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CEBCF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs DNKEY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while DNKEY trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SWDBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SWDBF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and SWDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs PPERY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 30.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PPERY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs PPERF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 30.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PPERF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and PPERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs JPHLF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs MLYBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while MLYBY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs MLYNF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SWDBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SWDBY trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs DNSKF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs FCNCB Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 26.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while FCNCB trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BDORY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 26.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BDORY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs PSZKF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PSZKF trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs JPPHY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 26.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while JPPHY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and JPPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs HSNGY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while HSNGY trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs PSZKY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 25.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PSZKY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs GBOOY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while GBOOY trades at $45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs GBOOF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while GBOOF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs HSNGF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs BLMIF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BLMIF trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and BLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs CGMBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SBGOF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 22.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SBGOF trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CKHGY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 21.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CKHGY trades at $94.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and CKHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs BPXXY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CMAKY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 21.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CMAKY trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and CMAKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs SGBLY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SGBLY trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BKHYY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 20.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKHYY trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and BKHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs RSNHF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 19.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while RSNHF trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CKHGF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs MDIBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while MDIBY trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CMTDF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 18.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CMTDF trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SUTNY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SUTNY trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CRDIY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs PBLOF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and PBLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs BKHPF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs ISNPY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while ISNPY trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs GPFOF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs AIBGY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 15.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while AIBGY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BDOUF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs GPFOY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs AIBRF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while AIBRF trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and AIBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs VLYPN Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while VLYPN trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to VLYPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SKCBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs SUGBY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BNCZF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BNCZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs OTPBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSDK vs MDIBF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BKPKF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 12.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKPKF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs BKRIY Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while BKRIY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.
FSDK vs CIMDF Comparison
FSDK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSDK stands at N/A. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FSDK is priced at $63.00, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSDK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FSDK's ROE is N/A, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSDK is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSDK.