Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund FSCWX Peers
See (FSCWX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSCWX | $31.63 | +0.64% | 250.27M | 14.57 | $2.17 | N/A |
| VOO | $540.03 | +0.11% | 1.35T | 26.19 | $20.62 | +1.29% |
| VFINX | $543.78 | +0.73% | 1.33T | 26.17 | $20.78 | +1.29% |
| VITSX | $140.85 | +0.74% | 1.19T | 25.41 | $5.54 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $140.83 | +0.74% | 1.19T | 25.41 | $5.54 | +0.02% |
| VTI | $289.38 | +0.05% | 600.09B | 25.42 | $11.39 | +1.30% |
| FXAIX | $204.59 | +0.72% | 593.97B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IVV | $590.35 | +0.07% | 587.33B | 25.60 | $23.06 | +1.31% |
| SPY | $587.53 | +0.12% | 539.22B | 25.60 | $22.95 | +1.22% |
| VTSNX | $141.44 | +0.29% | 469.79B | 16.15 | $8.76 | +2.97% |
Stock Comparison
FSCWX vs VOO Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.35T. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VOO trades at $540.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VFINX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.33T. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VFINX trades at $543.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VFINX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VITSX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.19T. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VITSX trades at $140.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VITSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VTSAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.19T. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTSAX trades at $140.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VTSAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VTI Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 600.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTI trades at $289.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs FXAIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 593.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FXAIX trades at $204.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FXAIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs IVV Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 587.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while IVV trades at $590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs SPY Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 539.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while SPY trades at $587.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VTSNX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 469.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTSNX trades at $141.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VTSNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VXUS Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 469.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VXUS trades at $65.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VMCPX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 339.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VMCPX trades at $364.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VMCPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VIMAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 311.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VIMAX trades at $334.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VIMAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VINIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 290.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VINIX trades at $478.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VINIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VIIIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 290.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VIIIX trades at $478.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VIIIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RGAGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 270.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RGAGX trades at $76.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RGAGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs GAFFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 270.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while GAFFX trades at $76.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and GAFFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AGTHX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 270.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AGTHX trades at $76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AGTHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs GFAFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 267.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while GFAFX trades at $75.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and GFAFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RGABX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 240.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RGABX trades at $67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RGABX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RGAAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 236.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RGAAX trades at $66.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RGAAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RLBGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 233.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RLBGX trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RLBGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AMBFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 232.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AMBFX trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AMBFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AFMBX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 232.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AFMBX trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AFMBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs BALFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while BALFX trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and BALFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs ABALX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 232.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while ABALX trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and ABALX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs GFACX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 230.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while GFACX trades at $65.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and GFACX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VTMNX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 214.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTMNX trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VTMNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VDIPX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 214.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VDIPX trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VDIPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VEA Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 213.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VEA trades at $53.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VB Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 204.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VB trades at $231.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs QQQ Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 203.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while QQQ trades at $518.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs BX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 193.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while BX trades at $148.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VTV Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 188.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTV trades at $169.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VO Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 175.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VO trades at $269.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs BLK Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 149.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while BLK trades at $967.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs AICCX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 148.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AICCX trades at $58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AICCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs FCTDX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 147.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FCTDX trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FCTDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AICFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AICFX trades at $58.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AICFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RICAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RICAX trades at $58.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RICAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RICBX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RICBX trades at $58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RICBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AIVSX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 147.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AIVSX trades at $59.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AIVSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs FCNKX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 145.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FCNKX trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FCNKX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs FCNTX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 145.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FCNTX trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FCNTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AWSHX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 141.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AWSHX trades at $63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AWSHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs C-PN Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 141.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while C-PN trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs FWMIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 141.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FWMIX trades at $63.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FWMIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 141.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RWMFX trades at $63.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RWMFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs ANWPX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 141.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while ANWPX trades at $65.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and ANWPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs CWMAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 141.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while CWMAX trades at $62.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and CWMAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs WSHFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 140.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while WSHFX trades at $62.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and WSHFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RNPGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RNPGX trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RNPGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs NPFFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while NPFFX trades at $65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and NPFFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs FNPFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 139.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FNPFX trades at $65.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FNPFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs WSHCX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 138.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while WSHCX trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and WSHCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RWMBX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 138.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RWMBX trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RWMBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs CFNAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while CFNAX trades at $83.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and CFNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs ANCFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while ANCFX trades at $83.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and ANCFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AFIFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 134.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AFIFX trades at $83.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AFIFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs IEFA Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 132.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while IEFA trades at $80.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to IEFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs AEGFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 127.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AEGFX trades at $58.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AEGFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RERHX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 127.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RERHX trades at $58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RERHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AEPFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 127.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AEPFX trades at $58.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AEPFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AEPGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AEPGX trades at $58.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AEPGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RERGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 126.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RERGX trades at $59.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RERGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AGG Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 122.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AGG trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 123.79. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs KKR Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 114.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while KKR trades at $128.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs IWF Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 113.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while IWF trades at $399.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to IWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VSCIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 107.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VSCIX trades at $111.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VSCIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs NAESX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 107.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while NAESX trades at $111.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and NAESX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VWELX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 107.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VWELX trades at $43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VWELX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VWENX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 106.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VWENX trades at $74.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VWENX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VIG Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 103.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VIG trades at $195.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VTTHX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 103.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTTHX trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VTTHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VDADX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 101.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VDADX trades at $53.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VDADX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs FSKAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 100.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while FSKAX trades at $161.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and FSKAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VUG Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 100.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VUG trades at $413.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs JLGMX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while JLGMX trades at $83.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and JLGMX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs JLGRX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while JLGRX trades at $82.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and JLGRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs SEEGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while SEEGX trades at $79.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and SEEGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs BN Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 97.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while BN trades at $59.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 205.10. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VTHRX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 96.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTHRX trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VTHRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs BAM Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 96.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while BAM trades at $58.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs TBCIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 94.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while TBCIX trades at $187.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and TBCIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs TRBCX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 93.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while TRBCX trades at $186.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and TRBCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs IJH Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 92.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while IJH trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VFORX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 92.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VFORX trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VFORX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VITAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 92.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VITAX trades at $313.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VITAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs DODGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 91.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while DODGX trades at $261.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and DODGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VGT Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 90.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VGT trades at $615.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSCWX.
FSCWX vs VTIVX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 90.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VTIVX trades at $30.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VTIVX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs PABGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 90.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while PABGX trades at $180.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and PABGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RAFFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 86.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RAFFX trades at $44.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RAFFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VIEIX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 85.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VIEIX trades at $140.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VIEIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs VEMAX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 84.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while VEMAX trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and VEMAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs RRBGX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 84.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while RRBGX trades at $167.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and RRBGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AMPFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 83.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AMPFX trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AMPFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs AMCPX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 83.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while AMCPX trades at $43.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and AMCPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs PRUFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 82.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while PRUFX trades at $104.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and PRUFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSCWX vs PRGFX Comparison
FSCWX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSCWX stands at 250.27M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 82.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSCWX is priced at $31.63, while PRGFX trades at $103.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSCWX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, FSCWX's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSCWX and PRGFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).