Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 76.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while APO trades at $133.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 57.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGIIX trades at $72.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 57.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FESGX trades at $69.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 57.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGENX trades at $72.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 57.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FEGRX trades at $73.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 40.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while APO-PA trades at $71.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 25.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GBLEX trades at $37.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 15.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MDLOX trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 15.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AGVEX trades at $24.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FSGGX trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLFOX trades at $17.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLIFX trades at $17.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while QYLD trades at $16.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 7.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PAVE trades at $39.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VHGEX trades at $35.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DFGEX trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JATSX trades at $55.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JATAX trades at $57.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAGTX trades at $59.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAGCX trades at $46.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JATNX trades at $60.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JATIX trades at $61.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JNGTX trades at $60.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PAGSX trades at $61.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PRGSX trades at $62.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ACWV trades at $118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGGFX trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PRJQX trades at $44.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PRJZX trades at $43.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CGGO trades at $29.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GUNR trades at $37.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JDWNX trades at $110.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JFNAX trades at $66.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAGLX trades at $67.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JFNNX trades at $67.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JFNCX trades at $56.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JFNSX trades at $64.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JNGLX trades at $67.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JFNIX trades at $68.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IOO trades at $97.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PRGTX trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JWGRX trades at $113.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while REET trades at $24.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JDWRX trades at $111.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JWWFX trades at $113.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JWWCX trades at $107.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAWWX trades at $111.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JDWAX trades at $113.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DGSIX trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGHIX trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VNQI trades at $43.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNQI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CTCAX trades at $80.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CTHCX trades at $67.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 33.88. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CTHRX trades at $87.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CMTFX trades at $85.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CGTUX trades at $87.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IXJ trades at $88.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while XYLD trades at $38.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MGGIX trades at $37.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MGGPX trades at $34.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MLPX trades at $60.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LGMAX trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LGMCX trades at $22.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LSWWX trades at $24.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MSFBX has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MSFBX trades at $34.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MSFBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFBX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MSFBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MSFLX has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MSFLX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MSFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MSFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GNR trades at $51.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, URA has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while URA trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas URA's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to URA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, COPX has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while COPX trades at $38.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas COPX's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to COPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while APDGX trades at $24.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ARTGX trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while APHGX trades at $24.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FTGC has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FTGC trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FTGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FTGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VGWLX trades at $25.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VGWAX trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NFRA trades at $59.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BOTZ trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DFGR trades at $26.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JORIX trades at $18.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while OPGIX trades at $45.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JORAX trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.34. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JORFX trades at $18.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JORNX trades at $18.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JSLNX trades at $18.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGTTX trades at $73.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JORRX trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PFFD trades at $18.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GCOW trades at $36.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MWEFX has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MWEFX trades at $44.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MWEFX's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MWEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VMVFX has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VMVFX trades at $16.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VMVFX's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMVFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VMVFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VMNVX has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VMNVX trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VMNVX's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMNVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VMNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JORCX trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGRNX has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGRNX trades at $22.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGRNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGRNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGINX has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGINX trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BIALX trades at $28.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CSGZX trades at $67.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IILGX trades at $27.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ARTRX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ARTRX trades at $31.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ARTRX's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ARTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGTRX trades at $64.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MLPA has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MLPA trades at $48.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MLPA's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MLPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ATERX has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ATERX trades at $149.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ATERX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATERX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ATERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, POSAX has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while POSAX trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas POSAX's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POSAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to POSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VGPMX has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VGPMX trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VGPMX's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGPMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VGPMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RYLD has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RYLD trades at $14.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RYLD's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VEIGX has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VEIGX trades at $36.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VEIGX's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEIGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VEIGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VESGX has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VESGX trades at $45.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VESGX's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VESGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CLIP has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CLIP trades at $100.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CLIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLIP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CLIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ICLN has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ICLN trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ICLN's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ICLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PZTRX has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PZTRX trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PZTRX's P/E ratio is 62.60. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PZTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PZTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, THORX has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while THORX trades at $38.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas THORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to THORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, THOIX has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while THOIX trades at $39.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas THOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to THOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, THOCX has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while THOCX trades at $37.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas THOCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THOCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to THOCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SIL has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SIL trades at $36.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SIL's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to SIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CSSPX has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CSSPX trades at $53.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CSSPX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CSSPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SHTCX has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SHTCX trades at $38.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SHTCX's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHTCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SHTCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SCGVX has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SCGVX trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SCGVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCGVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SCGVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SCMGX has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SCMGX trades at $30.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SCMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SCMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGTAX has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGTAX trades at $64.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGTAX's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGTAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGTAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RWO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RWO trades at $44.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RWO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, OAKGX has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while OAKGX trades at $33.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas OAKGX's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OAKGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to OAKGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PAGLX has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PAGLX trades at $41.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PAGLX's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RPGEX has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RPGEX trades at $42.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RPGEX's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RPGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ROBO has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ROBO trades at $52.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ROBO's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ROBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, OAKWX has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while OAKWX trades at $24.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas OAKWX's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OAKWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to OAKWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JKG has a market cap of 991.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JKG trades at $251.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JKG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, QGRNX has a market cap of 989.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while QGRNX trades at $19.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas QGRNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QGRNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to QGRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, QGRCX has a market cap of 989.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while QGRCX trades at $18.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas QGRCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QGRCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to QGRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, KXI has a market cap of 965.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while KXI trades at $66.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas KXI's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to KXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EXI has a market cap of 945.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EXI trades at $152.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EXI's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGEIX has a market cap of 943.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGEIX trades at $17.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGEIX's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGEIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ARGT has a market cap of 941.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ARGT trades at $83.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ARGT's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ARGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ETW has a market cap of 885.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ETW trades at $8.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ETW's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ESGYX has a market cap of 884.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ESGYX trades at $20.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ESGYX's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ESGYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ESGMX has a market cap of 884.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ESGMX trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ESGMX's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ESGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FFGCX has a market cap of 876.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FFGCX trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FFGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFGCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FFGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VCRAX has a market cap of 867.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VCRAX trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VCRAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCRAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VCRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TOLIX has a market cap of 861.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TOLIX trades at $16.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TOLIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOLIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TOLIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DGLCX has a market cap of 838.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DGLCX trades at $17.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DGLCX's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGLCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DGLCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DGLAX has a market cap of 838.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DGLAX trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DGLAX's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGLAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DGLAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DGLRX has a market cap of 838.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DGLRX trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DGLRX's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGLRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DGLRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ARYVX has a market cap of 829.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ARYVX trades at $13.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ARYVX's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARYVX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ARYVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGLYX has a market cap of 788.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGLYX trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGLYX's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PORIX has a market cap of 774.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PORIX trades at $55.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PORIX's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PORTX has a market cap of 774.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PORTX trades at $56.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PORTX's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PORTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PORTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RPGAX has a market cap of 760.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RPGAX trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RPGAX's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RPGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TEQAX has a market cap of 747.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TEQAX trades at $27.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TEQAX's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEQAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TEQAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TROCX has a market cap of 747.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TROCX trades at $29.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TROCX's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TROCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TROCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JETS has a market cap of 744.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JETS trades at $21.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JETS's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to JETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MEGI has a market cap of 703.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MEGI trades at $13.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MEGI's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEGI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to MEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PXWEX has a market cap of 684.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PXWEX trades at $32.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PXWEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXWEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PXWEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PXWIX has a market cap of 684.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PXWIX trades at $32.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PXWIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXWIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PXWIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FOIIX has a market cap of 676.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FOIIX trades at $31.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FOIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FOIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WFGGX has a market cap of 651.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WFGGX trades at $27.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WFGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WFGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WFGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DIV has a market cap of 645.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DIV trades at $17.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DIV's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FOOLX has a market cap of 637.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FOOLX trades at $30.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FOOLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FOOLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BOE has a market cap of 623.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BOE trades at $10.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BOE's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IGLGX has a market cap of 601.45M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IGLGX trades at $18.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IGLGX's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IGLGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TWGGX has a market cap of 598.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TWGGX trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TWGGX's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TWGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FGD has a market cap of 593.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FGD trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FGD's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, KRMA has a market cap of 589.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while KRMA trades at $37.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas KRMA's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to KRMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NLGIX has a market cap of 578.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NLGIX trades at $13.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NLGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NLGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to NLGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NGPAX has a market cap of 578.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NGPAX trades at $13.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NGPAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGPAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to NGPAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IXG has a market cap of 569.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IXG trades at $104.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IXG's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DGCB has a market cap of 549.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DGCB trades at $52.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DGCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGCB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HFAHF has a market cap of 543.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HFAHF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HFAHF's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFAHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HFAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLVNX has a market cap of 533.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLVNX trades at $74.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLVNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLVNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLVNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLVAX has a market cap of 533.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLVAX trades at $78.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLVAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLVAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HLMVX has a market cap of 519.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HLMVX trades at $34.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HLMVX's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLMVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HLMVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HLMGX has a market cap of 519.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HLMGX trades at $34.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HLMGX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HLMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GHY has a market cap of 517.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GHY trades at $12.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GHY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CFWIX has a market cap of 513.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CFWIX trades at $28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CFWIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFWIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CFWIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CFWAX has a market cap of 513.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CFWAX trades at $27.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CFWAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CFWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CFWCX has a market cap of 513.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CFWCX trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CFWCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CFWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGAIX has a market cap of 509.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGAIX trades at $38.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGAIX's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGAFX has a market cap of 509.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGAFX trades at $37.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGAFX's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGLUX has a market cap of 509.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGLUX trades at $38.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGLUX's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGLUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GII has a market cap of 498.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GII trades at $64.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GII's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RGOIX has a market cap of 482.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RGOIX trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RGOIX's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RGOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DNL has a market cap of 479.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DNL trades at $37.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DNL's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to DNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MWOFX has a market cap of 469.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MWOFX trades at $60.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MWOFX's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWOFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MWOFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RING has a market cap of 468.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RING trades at $40.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RING's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RING's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to RING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ALTI has a market cap of 464.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ALTI trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ALTI's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALTI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ALTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AUSF has a market cap of 464.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AUSF trades at $42.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AUSF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IGD has a market cap of 440.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IGD trades at $5.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IGD's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MICGX has a market cap of 430.57M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MICGX trades at $11.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MICGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MICGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MICGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IXP has a market cap of 430.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IXP trades at $101.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IXP's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW and IXP have similar daily volatility (1.15).

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SMYIX has a market cap of 415.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SMYIX trades at $24.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SMYIX's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMYIX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SMYIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ETO has a market cap of 409.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ETO trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ETO's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ETO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CSUAX has a market cap of 387.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CSUAX trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CSUAX's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSUAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CSUAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TMFG has a market cap of 377.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TMFG trades at $29.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TMFG's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CCGSX has a market cap of 373.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CCGSX trades at $24.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CCGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CCGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CCGIX has a market cap of 373.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CCGIX trades at $24.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CCGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CCGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MGLBX has a market cap of 353.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MGLBX trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MGLBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGLBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MGLBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGIIX has a market cap of 353.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGIIX trades at $25.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGIRX has a market cap of 353.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGIRX trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AWP has a market cap of 341.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AWP trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AWP's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PFFV has a market cap of 304.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PFFV trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PFFV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PFFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DSHGX has a market cap of 299.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DSHGX trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DSHGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DSHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DRIV has a market cap of 294.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DRIV trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DRIV's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DRIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GINNX has a market cap of 292.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GINNX trades at $56.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GINNX's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GINNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GINNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGH has a market cap of 289.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGH trades at $14.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGH's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to BGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IWIRX has a market cap of 285.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IWIRX trades at $55.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IWIRX's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IWIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MGU has a market cap of 280.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MGU trades at $22.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MGU's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to MGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FSBBX has a market cap of 277.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FSBBX trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FSBBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSBBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FSBBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FSBCX has a market cap of 264.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FSBCX trades at $19.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FSBCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FSBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SBFIX has a market cap of 264.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SBFIX trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SBFIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBFIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SBFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FSTBX has a market cap of 264.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FSTBX trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FSTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FSTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FSBKX has a market cap of 264.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FSBKX trades at $20.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FSBKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSBKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FSBKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WWOIX has a market cap of 263.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WWOIX trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WWOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WWOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NWWOX has a market cap of 263.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NWWOX trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NWWOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWWOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to NWWOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FINX has a market cap of 260.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FINX trades at $28.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FINX's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HGXAX has a market cap of 258.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HGXAX trades at $15.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HGXAX's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGXAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HGXAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HGXYX has a market cap of 258.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HGXYX trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HGXYX's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGXYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HGXYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RXI has a market cap of 256.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RXI trades at $180.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RXI's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RXI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AGD has a market cap of 253.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AGD trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AGD's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PSP has a market cap of 248.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PSP trades at $64.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PSP's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VSTKF has a market cap of 246.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VSTKF trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VSTKF's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSTKF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to VSTKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GAL has a market cap of 243.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GAL trades at $45.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GAL's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BPGIX has a market cap of 241.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BPGIX trades at $25.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGAPX has a market cap of 238.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGAPX trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGAPX's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAPX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SGACX has a market cap of 238.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SGACX trades at $19.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SGACX's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SGACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CLSAX has a market cap of 235.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CLSAX trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CLSAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CLSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WOOD has a market cap of 233.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WOOD trades at $72.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WOOD's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOOD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MXI has a market cap of 229.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MXI trades at $83.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MXI's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PSAIX has a market cap of 225.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PSAIX trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PSAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PSAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JGCIX has a market cap of 224.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JGCIX trades at $13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JGCIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JGCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JGCCX has a market cap of 224.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JGCCX trades at $12.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JGCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JGCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JSPGX has a market cap of 224.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JSPGX trades at $13.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JSPGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JSPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JGCAX has a market cap of 224.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JGCAX trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JGCAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JGCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JGCSX has a market cap of 224.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JGCSX trades at $12.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JGCSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGCSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JGCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, APFDX has a market cap of 223.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while APFDX trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas APFDX's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APFDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to APFDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EOD has a market cap of 219.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EOD trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EOD's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EOD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to EOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLO has a market cap of 214.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLO trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLO's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JSTC has a market cap of 212.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JSTC trades at $18.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JSTC's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JSTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SNSR has a market cap of 204.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SNSR trades at $33.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SNSR's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to SNSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DAX has a market cap of 202.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DAX trades at $42.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DAX's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to DAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGLAX has a market cap of 199.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGLAX trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGLAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGLAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGLAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WIGOX has a market cap of 193.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WIGOX trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WIGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WIGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WAGOX has a market cap of 193.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WAGOX trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WAGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WAGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WDIV has a market cap of 192.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WDIV trades at $67.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WDIV's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HGLB has a market cap of 190.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HGLB trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HGLB's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to HGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SRET has a market cap of 185.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SRET trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SRET's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SRET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JSPMX has a market cap of 183.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JSPMX trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JSPMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSPMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JSPMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JMOCX has a market cap of 183.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JMOCX trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JMOCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMOCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JMOCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JMOAX has a market cap of 183.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JMOAX trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JMOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JMOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JMOSX has a market cap of 183.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JMOSX trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JMOSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMOSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JMOSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JMOIX has a market cap of 183.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JMOIX trades at $12.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JMOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JMOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GREK has a market cap of 178.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GREK trades at $50.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GREK's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GREK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GREK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GGGIX has a market cap of 177.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GGGIX trades at $59.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GGGAX has a market cap of 177.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GGGAX trades at $57.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GGGAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GGGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BGRSX has a market cap of 177.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BGRSX trades at $15.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BGRSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGRSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BGRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IGA has a market cap of 176.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IGA trades at $9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IGA's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, KRBN has a market cap of 169.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while KRBN trades at $28.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas KRBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRBN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to KRBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FTEMX has a market cap of 169.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FTEMX trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FTEMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTEMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FTEMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DBISX has a market cap of 167.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DBISX trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DBISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBISX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DBISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JXI has a market cap of 162.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JXI trades at $71.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JXI's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PCGG has a market cap of 159.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PCGG trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PCGG's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PCGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, THNQ has a market cap of 157.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while THNQ trades at $46.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas THNQ's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THNQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to THNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ARTHX has a market cap of 156.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ARTHX trades at $21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ARTHX's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTHX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ARTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RJA has a market cap of 154.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RJA trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RJA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, YFSNX has a market cap of 148.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while YFSNX trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas YFSNX's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YFSNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to YFSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SPRE has a market cap of 147.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SPRE trades at $19.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SPRE's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GPRIX has a market cap of 146.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GPRIX trades at $15.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GPRIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPRIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GPRIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGUAX has a market cap of 145.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGUAX trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGUAX's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGUAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGUAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGIUX has a market cap of 145.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGIUX trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGIUX's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGIUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGIUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGUCX has a market cap of 145.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGUCX trades at $15.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGUCX's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGUCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGUCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DVRAX has a market cap of 141.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DVRAX trades at $13.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DVRAX's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVRAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DVRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TRGVX has a market cap of 140.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TRGVX trades at $17.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TRGVX's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRGVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TRGVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ERUS has a market cap of 135.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ERUS trades at $8.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ERUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ERUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RPGIX has a market cap of 134.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RPGIX trades at $19.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RPGIX's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CLACX has a market cap of 134.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CLACX trades at $10.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CLACX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CLACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JCACX has a market cap of 130.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JCACX trades at $11.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JCACX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JCACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JSPCX has a market cap of 130.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JSPCX trades at $11.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JSPCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSPCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JSPCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JCASX has a market cap of 130.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JCASX trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JCASX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCASX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JCASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JCAAX has a market cap of 130.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JCAAX trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JCAAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JCAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JCAIX has a market cap of 130.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JCAIX trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JCAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JCAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FAN has a market cap of 130.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FAN trades at $15.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FAN's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TOLZ has a market cap of 130.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TOLZ trades at $53.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TOLZ's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOLZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TOLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DJIA has a market cap of 125.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DJIA trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DJIA's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DJIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DJIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CAGEX has a market cap of 124.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CAGEX trades at $16.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CAGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CAGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLQ has a market cap of 121.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLQ trades at $6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLQ's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ONOF has a market cap of 119.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ONOF trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ONOF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EKGYX has a market cap of 117.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EKGYX trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EKGYX's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EKGYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EKGYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EKGCX has a market cap of 117.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EKGCX trades at $19.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EKGCX's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EKGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EKGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EKGAX has a market cap of 117.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EKGAX trades at $35.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EKGAX's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EKGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EKGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EKGIX has a market cap of 117.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EKGIX trades at $38.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EKGIX's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EKGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EKGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SLVP has a market cap of 116.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SLVP trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SLVP's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to SLVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RBIN has a market cap of 115.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RBIN trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RBIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RBIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SOCL has a market cap of 115.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SOCL trades at $44.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SOCL's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SOCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MILN has a market cap of 113.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MILN trades at $44.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MILN's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MILN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MILN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DVAL has a market cap of 110.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DVAL trades at $13.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DVAL's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DVAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GOAU has a market cap of 110.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GOAU trades at $26.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GOAU's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GOAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RJI has a market cap of 108.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RJI trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RJI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to RJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GMOM has a market cap of 107.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GMOM trades at $28.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GMOM's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMOM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GMOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ZJPN has a market cap of 106.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ZJPN trades at $91.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ZJPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZJPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ZJPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CGO has a market cap of 105.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CGO trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CGO's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLOF has a market cap of 102.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLOF trades at $44.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLOF's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GGIAX has a market cap of 101.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GGIAX trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GGIAX's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GGIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GGZ has a market cap of 98.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GGZ trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GGZ's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VEGI has a market cap of 93.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VEGI trades at $38.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VEGI's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TQGEX has a market cap of 91.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TQGEX trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TQGEX's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGEX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TQGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GXG has a market cap of 86.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GXG trades at $27.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GXG's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GXG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GESIX has a market cap of 85.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GESIX trades at $17.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GESIX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GESIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GESIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GESOX has a market cap of 85.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GESOX trades at $17.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GESOX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GESOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GESOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GDO has a market cap of 85.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GDO trades at $11.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GDO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GGSOX has a market cap of 84.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GGSOX trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GGSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GGSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GGSYX has a market cap of 84.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GGSYX trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GGSYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGSYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GGSYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ESGG has a market cap of 84.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ESGG trades at $173.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ESGG's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ESGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LVAGX has a market cap of 78.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LVAGX trades at $14.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LVAGX's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LVAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VEOIX has a market cap of 74.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VEOIX trades at $20.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VEOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEOIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to VEOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EBIZ has a market cap of 72.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EBIZ trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EBIZ's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBIZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to EBIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CADIX has a market cap of 72.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CADIX trades at $21.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CADIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CADIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CADIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, COGRX has a market cap of 72.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while COGRX trades at $19.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas COGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to COGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLNAX has a market cap of 69.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLNAX trades at $22.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLNAX's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RGT has a market cap of 68.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RGT trades at $10.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RGT's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to RGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PBD has a market cap of 67.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PBD trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PBD's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VPN has a market cap of 64.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VPN trades at $15.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VPN's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to VPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WWWEX has a market cap of 63.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WWWEX trades at $17.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WWWEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWWEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WWWEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ASEA has a market cap of 60.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ASEA trades at $16.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ASEA's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ASEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LPEFX has a market cap of 60.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LPEFX trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LPEFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPEFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LPEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FRN has a market cap of 58.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FRN trades at $14.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AGNG has a market cap of 58.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AGNG trades at $31.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AGNG's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AGNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EEB has a market cap of 57.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EEB trades at $39.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EEB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EBLU has a market cap of 57.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EBLU trades at $50.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EBLU's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBLU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DRW has a market cap of 57.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DRW trades at $22.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FGBFX has a market cap of 56.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FGBFX trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FGBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGBFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FGBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MIGIX has a market cap of 55.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MIGIX trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MIGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MIGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MSPTX has a market cap of 55.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MSPTX trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MSPTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSPTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MSPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MIGPX has a market cap of 55.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MIGPX trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MIGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MIGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AGAQX has a market cap of 55.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AGAQX trades at $10.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AGAQX's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGAQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AGAQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HTY has a market cap of 54.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HTY trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HTY's P/E ratio is 83.17. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to HTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ISDX has a market cap of 54.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ISDX trades at $26.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ISDX's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ISDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FILL has a market cap of 53.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FILL trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FILL's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, OIL has a market cap of 53.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while OIL trades at $28.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas OIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to OIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, OBEGX has a market cap of 52.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while OBEGX trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas OBEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBEGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to OBEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ZCAN has a market cap of 51.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ZCAN trades at $70.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ZCAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ZCAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GAA has a market cap of 51.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GAA trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GAA's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NORW has a market cap of 51.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NORW trades at $27.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NORW's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NORW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to NORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GNOM has a market cap of 50.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GNOM trades at $8.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GNOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AZAL has a market cap of 50.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AZAL trades at $27.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AZAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to AZAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, XYLG has a market cap of 50.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while XYLG trades at $26.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas XYLG's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to XYLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AGLOX has a market cap of 50.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AGLOX trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AGLOX's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AGLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WGGNX has a market cap of 47.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WGGNX trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WGGNX's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGGNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WGGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MGQIX has a market cap of 47.74M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MGQIX trades at $17.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MGQIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGQIX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MGQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CUT has a market cap of 47.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CUT trades at $29.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CUT's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EMBOX has a market cap of 44.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EMBOX trades at $10.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EMBOX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMBOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EMBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGJZX has a market cap of 44.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGJZX trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGJZX's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GURU has a market cap of 44.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GURU trades at $49.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GURU's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GURU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GURU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HTEC has a market cap of 43.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HTEC trades at $27.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HTEC's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EWSC has a market cap of 43.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EWSC trades at $67.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EWSC's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AIAFX has a market cap of 41.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AIAFX trades at $24.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AIAFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIAFX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AIAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HGGIX has a market cap of 40.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HGGIX trades at $24.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HGGAX has a market cap of 40.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HGGAX trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HGGAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HGGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HNGIX has a market cap of 40.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HNGIX trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HNGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HNGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DMRE has a market cap of 39.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DMRE trades at $46.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DMRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LNGR has a market cap of 39.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LNGR trades at $27.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LNGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JETAX has a market cap of 37.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JETAX trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JETAX's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JETAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FCGIX has a market cap of 37.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FCGIX trades at $19.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FCGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FCGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GXF has a market cap of 36.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GXF trades at $32.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW and GXF have similar daily volatility (1.15).

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PGLOX has a market cap of 36.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PGLOX trades at $17.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PGLOX's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PGLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FLFGX has a market cap of 36.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FLFGX trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FLFGX's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLFGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FLFGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JPMF has a market cap of 36.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JPMF trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JPMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAGAX has a market cap of 36.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAGAX trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAGAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAGNX has a market cap of 36.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAGNX trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAGNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAGSX has a market cap of 36.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAGSX trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JVGTX has a market cap of 36.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JVGTX trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JVGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JVGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JVGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JVGIX has a market cap of 36.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JVGIX trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JVGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JVGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JVGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JAVCX has a market cap of 36.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JAVCX trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JAVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JAVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SDEM has a market cap of 35.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SDEM trades at $26.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SDEM's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDEM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SDEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ENTIX has a market cap of 35.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ENTIX trades at $16.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ENTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENTIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ENTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PQIN has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PQIN trades at $49.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PQIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PQIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PQIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JEASX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JEASX trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JEASX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEASX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JEASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JEUIX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JEUIX trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JEUIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEUIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JEUIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JECTX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JECTX trades at $16.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JECTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JECTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JECTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JESSX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JESSX trades at $16.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JESSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JESSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JESSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JEGRX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JEGRX trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JEGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JETNX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JETNX trades at $16.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JETNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JETNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JETTX has a market cap of 33.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JETTX trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JETTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JETTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WTMVX has a market cap of 33.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WTMVX trades at $11.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WTMVX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTMVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WTMVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EUMV has a market cap of 32.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EUMV trades at $25.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EUMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EUMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BOAT has a market cap of 32.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BOAT trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BOAT's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to BOAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, OLD has a market cap of 31.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while OLD trades at $29.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas OLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to OLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MFQAX has a market cap of 31.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MFQAX trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MFQAX's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFQAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MFQAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JIDA has a market cap of 30.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JIDA trades at $43.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JIDA's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JIDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to JIDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ZDEU has a market cap of 29.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ZDEU trades at $67.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ZDEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ZDEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GENY has a market cap of 29.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GENY trades at $39.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GENY's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LVL has a market cap of 29.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LVL trades at $12.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LVL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to LVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GROW has a market cap of 28.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GROW trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GROW's P/E ratio is 53.25. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GROW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NRES has a market cap of 28.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NRES trades at $23.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NRES's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to NRES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PAK has a market cap of 28.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PAK trades at $16.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PAK's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to PAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RYFSX has a market cap of 27.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RYFSX trades at $5.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RYFSX's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RYFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RLTAX has a market cap of 27.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RLTAX trades at $14.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RLTAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLTAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RLTAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CLOAX has a market cap of 26.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CLOAX trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CLOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CLOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, KOCG has a market cap of 26.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while KOCG trades at $28.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas KOCG's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to KOCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HYDR has a market cap of 25.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HYDR trades at $16.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HYDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to HYDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AZTD has a market cap of 25.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AZTD trades at $24.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AZTD's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZTD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AZTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CTEC has a market cap of 25.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CTEC trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CTEC's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to CTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JPED has a market cap of 25.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JPED trades at $21.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JPED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JPED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FFR has a market cap of 24.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FFR trades at $36.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to FFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MKIEX has a market cap of 24.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MKIEX trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MKIEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKIEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MKIEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MBEAX has a market cap of 24.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MBEAX trades at $11.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MBEAX's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBEAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MBEAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MBESX has a market cap of 24.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MBESX trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MBESX's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBESX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MBESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MBEYX has a market cap of 24.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MBEYX trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MBEYX's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MBEYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MBEYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NDIA has a market cap of 24.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NDIA trades at $29.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NDIA's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NDIA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to NDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IDY has a market cap of 24.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IDY trades at $22.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ESGF has a market cap of 24.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ESGF trades at $30.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ESGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ESGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BITS has a market cap of 23.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BITS trades at $57.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BITS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BITS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CYB has a market cap of 23.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CYB trades at $24.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CYB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JZRO has a market cap of 22.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JZRO trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JZRO's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JZRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JZRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AXJL has a market cap of 22.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AXJL trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AXJL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXJL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to AXJL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MUSQ has a market cap of 22.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MUSQ trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MUSQ's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MUSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MMAVX has a market cap of 20.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MMAVX trades at $13.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MMAVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMAVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MMAVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EGPT has a market cap of 20.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EGPT trades at $21.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EGPT's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to EGPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CEFA has a market cap of 20.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CEFA trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CEFA's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CHIX has a market cap of 19.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CHIX trades at $10.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CHIX's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RNDM has a market cap of 19.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RNDM trades at $50.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RNDM's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNDM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DXGE has a market cap of 19.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DXGE trades at $33.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DXGE's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to DXGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JJN has a market cap of 18.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JJN trades at $28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JJN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JPMV has a market cap of 18.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JPMV trades at $60.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JPMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JPMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TGMEX has a market cap of 18.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TGMEX trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TGMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGMEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TGMEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WMCNX has a market cap of 17.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WMCNX trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WMCNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WMCNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WMCNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ISEM has a market cap of 17.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ISEM trades at $23.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ISEM's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISEM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ISEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TTTN has a market cap of 16.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TTTN trades at $43.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TTTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TTTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FFIRX has a market cap of 16.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FFIRX trades at $11.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FFIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FFIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CNGLX has a market cap of 15.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CNGLX trades at $19.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNGLX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JPEU has a market cap of 15.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JPEU trades at $52.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JPEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to JPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MXDE has a market cap of 15.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MXDE trades at $23.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MXDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXDE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MXDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ESGW has a market cap of 14.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ESGW trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ESGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ESGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FLQE has a market cap of 14.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FLQE trades at $23.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FLQE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLQE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FLQE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CHIL has a market cap of 14.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CHIL trades at $33.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to CHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WCHN has a market cap of 13.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WCHN trades at $27.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WCHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WAGSX has a market cap of 13.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WAGSX trades at $12.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAGSX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, PEX has a market cap of 13.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while PEX trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas PEX's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to PEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SROI has a market cap of 13.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SROI trades at $29.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SROI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, QGTA has a market cap of 12.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while QGTA trades at $23.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas QGTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QGTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to QGTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SBUG has a market cap of 12.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SBUG trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SBUG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SBUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, KOIN has a market cap of 12.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while KOIN trades at $33.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas KOIN's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to KOIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HEWC has a market cap of 12.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HEWC trades at $28.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HEWC's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEWC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HEWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ZHOK has a market cap of 12.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ZHOK trades at $72.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ZHOK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZHOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ZHOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EWEM has a market cap of 12.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EWEM trades at $31.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWEM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, MVIN has a market cap of 12.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while MVIN trades at $41.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas MVIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to MVIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GLCN has a market cap of 12.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GLCN trades at $21.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GLCN's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLCN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BICK has a market cap of 12.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BICK trades at $27.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BICK's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BICK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ADRU has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ADRU trades at $21.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ADRU's P/E ratio is 253.76. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ADRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, VNAM has a market cap of 11.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while VNAM trades at $15.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas VNAM's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to VNAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SLIM has a market cap of 11.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SLIM trades at $33.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SLIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to SLIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GXTG has a market cap of 11.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GXTG trades at $22.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GXTG's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GXTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GXTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LSTOX has a market cap of 11.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LSTOX trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LSTOX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSTOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LSTOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ICOL has a market cap of 10.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ICOL trades at $9.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ICOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ICOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EVSTC has a market cap of 10.57M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EVSTC trades at $99.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EVSTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVSTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EVSTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EVGBC has a market cap of 10.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EVGBC trades at $99.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EVGBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVGBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EVGBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EAFD has a market cap of 10.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EAFD trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EAFD's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EAFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EAFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ACSG has a market cap of 10.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ACSG trades at $33.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ACSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ACSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GAGEX has a market cap of 10.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GAGEX trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GAGEX's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GAGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TYLG has a market cap of 9.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TYLG trades at $30.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TYLG's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to TYLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, AQWA has a market cap of 9.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while AQWA trades at $18.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas AQWA's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AQWA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to AQWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EFAS has a market cap of 9.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EFAS trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EFAS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EFAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, INFR has a market cap of 9.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while INFR trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas INFR's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to INFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CEZ has a market cap of 9.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CEZ trades at $27.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, LVAFX has a market cap of 9.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while LVAFX trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas LVAFX's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVAFX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to LVAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CHIK has a market cap of 9.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CHIK trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CHIK's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHIK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CHIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BKES has a market cap of 9.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BKES trades at $37.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BKES's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to BKES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ESIFF has a market cap of 9.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ESIFF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ESIFF's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESIFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ESIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GDMOX has a market cap of 9.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GDMOX trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GDMOX's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDMOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to GDMOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, GIGE has a market cap of 9.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while GIGE trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas GIGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to GIGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ERSX has a market cap of 9.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ERSX trades at $11.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ERSX's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to ERSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BKIS has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BKIS trades at $44.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BKIS's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to BKIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RFAP has a market cap of 8.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RFAP trades at $58.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RFAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, KROP has a market cap of 8.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while KROP trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas KROP's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KROP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to KROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DBGR has a market cap of 8.45M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DBGR trades at $34.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DBGR's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DBGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HFXE has a market cap of 8.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HFXE trades at $19.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HFXE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFXE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HFXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CNY has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CNY trades at $44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to CNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, WRND has a market cap of 7.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while WRND trades at $29.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas WRND's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to WRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IRBA has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IRBA trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IRBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRBA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IRBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HFXJ has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HFXJ trades at $20.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HFXJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HFXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RYLG has a market cap of 7.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RYLG trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RYLG's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RYLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, XBUY has a market cap of 6.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while XBUY trades at $32.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas XBUY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBUY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to XBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, TPAY has a market cap of 6.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while TPAY trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas TPAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to TPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, BYOB has a market cap of 6.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while BYOB trades at $19.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas BYOB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYOB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to BYOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, IXSE has a market cap of 6.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while IXSE trades at $33.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas IXSE's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to IXSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SDGA has a market cap of 6.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SDGA trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SDGA's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to SDGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, NTZG has a market cap of 6.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while NTZG trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas NTZG's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTZG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to NTZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DIVD has a market cap of 6.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DIVD trades at $34.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DIVD's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIVD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to DIVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CROP has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CROP trades at $32.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CROP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CROP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, ORG has a market cap of 6.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while ORG trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas ORG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to ORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, JRNY has a market cap of 6.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while JRNY trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas JRNY's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to JRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, EWJE has a market cap of 6.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while EWJE trades at $31.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas EWJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWJE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to EWJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CHIR has a market cap of 6.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CHIR trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CHIR's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to CHIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, HEWP has a market cap of 6.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while HEWP trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas HEWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEWP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to HEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, CN has a market cap of 5.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while CN trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas CN's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, RJZ has a market cap of 5.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while RJZ trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas RJZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to RJZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FTAG has a market cap of 5.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FTAG trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FTAG's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FTAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, DWCR has a market cap of 5.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while DWCR trades at $29.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas DWCR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWCR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to DWCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, FLFR has a market cap of 5.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while FLFR trades at $27.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas FLFR's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is more volatile compared to FLFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.

FLOW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLOW stands at 9.60M. In comparison, SOLCF has a market cap of 4.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FLOW is priced at $29.76, while SOLCF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLOW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.06, whereas SOLCF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FLOW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOLCF's ROE of +9.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FLOW is less volatile compared to SOLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLOW.