Frontline Gold Corporation
Frontline Gold Corporation FLDPF Peers
See (FLDPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLDPF | $0.00 | N/A | 1.47M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.24 | +2.13% | 63.65B | 11.81 | $0.19 | +1.88% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $21.03 | N/A | 18.82B | 15.24 | $1.38 | +2.60% |
| NESRF | $12.05 | +0.42% | 17.23B | 22.74 | $0.53 | +1.73% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.43% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLDPF vs ZIJMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 63.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs OPYGY Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs GFIOF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 18.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while GFIOF trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs NESRF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while NESRF trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs NSTYY Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs HCHDY Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs NCMGY Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs NCMGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs KOZAY Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs LUGDF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while LUGDF trades at $43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs CAHPF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while CAHPF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and CAHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs HGMCF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs ZHAOF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs AULGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs EDVMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while EDVMF trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -67.67. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs DGMLF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ARGTF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ARGTF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -218.57. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs SBYSF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ZIJMY Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMY trades at $45.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs PMNXF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while PMNXF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs OCANF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while OCANF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs TORXF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while TORXF trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs CRNLF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs DPMLF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while DPMLF trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs KNTNF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while KNTNF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs GSISF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs ELKMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ELKMF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs CELTF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs GRLGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RGRNF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RMLRF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RMLRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs REDLF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs CXBMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while CXBMF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs WDOFF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while WDOFF trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs EOGSF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs HCHDF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while HCHDF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs WFRSF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ORAAF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ORAAF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs DRDGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs OBNNF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs PAFRF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and PAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs AURQF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs MAUTF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while MAUTF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs SVLKF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs MWSNF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 906.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while MWSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -74.40. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs SNWGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 881.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while SNWGF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -39.18. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs SGSVF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs BELGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 872.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while BELGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs KRRGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RUPRF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 855.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RUPRF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -182.85. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RMGGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 745.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RMGGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs WTGRF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RGDFF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs GUYGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 569.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while GUYGF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs PDIYF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 556.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while PDIYF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs NVMLF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ARNGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs MNSAF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 434.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while MNSAF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs KSKGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ORZCF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 403.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ORZCF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ECRTF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 401.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ASGOF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 368.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ASGOF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs LMGDF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 359.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while LMGDF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs TPRXF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RSRBF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 343.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RSRBF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and RSRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs MNDJF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 324.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while MNDJF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RIOFF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 320.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RIOFF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -15.08. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs FDMIF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 314.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while FDMIF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -36.78. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs PROBF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 314.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while PROBF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs THXPF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 312.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while THXPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs MGDPF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ALKEF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 278.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ALKEF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs OGNRF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 264.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while OGNRF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 131.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs RMLFF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 263.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while RMLFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs MAKOF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 263.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while MAKOF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs OSIIF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs ERRSF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs TTTNF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs ELEMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 249.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while ELEMF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs STBMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 199.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while STBMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs HSTXF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 198.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while HSTXF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs WRLGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 197.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while WRLGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs SAAGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs CNLMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs JAGGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 189.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while JAGGF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -29.87. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs SRBIF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 186.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while SRBIF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs OMGGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 182.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while OMGGF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and OMGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs DCCNF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs CNMXF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs THSGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 174.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while THSGF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 36.88. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs GDRZF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 174.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while GDRZF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs TETOF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, TETOF has a market cap of 170.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while TETOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TETOF's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TETOF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to TETOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs STPGF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 159.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while STPGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs KFFLF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs GGAZF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 156.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while GGAZF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs EEYMF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs AGXKF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.
FLDPF vs NVOOF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF and NVOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLDPF vs DNGDF Comparison
FLDPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDPF stands at 1.47M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 138.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDPF is priced at $0.00, while DNGDF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDPF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, FLDPF's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDPF is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDPF.