Foresight Financial Group, Inc.
Foresight Financial Group, Inc. FGFH Peers
See (FGFH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGFH | $30.70 | -0.16% | 111.04M | 6.38 | $4.81 | +2.48% |
| UNCRY | $31.35 | -0.24% | 199.37B | 9.25 | $3.39 | +2.46% |
| CAIXY | $2.74 | +0.37% | 175.53B | 8.84 | $0.31 | +4.48% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.23 | -0.97% | 154.58B | 7.93 | $3.94 | +4.35% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 129.53B | 6.61 | $0.77 | +5.44% |
| BNPQY | $44.63 | -0.80% | 100.82B | 8.47 | $5.27 | +5.58% |
| DBSDF | $35.33 | +2.08% | 100.06B | 12.14 | $2.91 | +2.96% |
| IITSF | $5.61 | +0.72% | 99.73B | 10.02 | $0.56 | +6.13% |
| DBSDY | $139.54 | +2.30% | 99.20B | 6.46 | $21.61 | +4.68% |
Stock Comparison
FGFH vs UNCRY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 199.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while UNCRY trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CAIXY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 175.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CAIXY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKAYY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CIHKY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 154.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CIHKY trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CIHHF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 129.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BNPQY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 100.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BNPQY trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs DBSDF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 100.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while DBSDF trades at $35.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs IITSF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 99.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while IITSF trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs DBSDY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 99.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while DBSDY trades at $139.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs UNCFF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 98.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while UNCFF trades at $63.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BNPQF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 97.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BNPQF trades at $86.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SBKFF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 96.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs KBCSY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 75.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while KBCSY trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PBCRY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 70.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PBCRY trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PBCRF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 66.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PBCRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CHCJY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 66.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CHCJY trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs AKSJF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs MZHOF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 65.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while MZHOF trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs EBKDY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while EBKDY trades at $39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs LLDTF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs LLOBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 59.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CRARF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 59.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CRARF trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CRARY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CRARY trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PSBKF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 58.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PSBKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs OVCHF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while OVCHF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs OVCHY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while OVCHY trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CIXPF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 56.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CIXPF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CHBJF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs NRDBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while NRDBY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs NBNKF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while NBNKF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs UOVEF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs STNDF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs UOVEY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while UOVEY trades at $54.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BHKLY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 44.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BHKLY trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BNKHF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BNKHF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SCGLY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SCGLY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs DNBBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while DNBBF trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKRKY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 39.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKRKY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SCGLF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SCGLF trades at $54.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs DNBBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 38.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while DNBBY trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKRKF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 37.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKRKF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs KBCSF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 36.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while KBCSF trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SVKEF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CWESF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CRZBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CRZBF trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs JPSTF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CRZBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CRZBY trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs JPPTY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs DNKEY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while DNKEY trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CEBCF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs EBKOF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while EBKOF trades at $80.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PPERF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 30.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PPERF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BDORY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 30.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BDORY trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs JPPHY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 29.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while JPPHY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PPERY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 29.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PPERY trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs JPHLF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SWDBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SWDBY trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs MLYNF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SWDBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SWDBF trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs MLYBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while MLYBY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs DNSKF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PSZKY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 27.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PSZKY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs FCNCB Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 26.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while FCNCB trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PSZKF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PSZKF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs HSNGY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while HSNGY trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs GBOOF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while GBOOF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CMAKY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 25.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CMAKY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs GBOOY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while GBOOY trades at $44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs HSNGF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CKHGY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 23.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CKHGY trades at $100.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BLMIF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BLMIF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CGMBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BPXXY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SGBLY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SGBLY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKHYY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 20.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKHYY trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs RSNHF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 20.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while RSNHF trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs MDIBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while MDIBY trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CKHGF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CMTDF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CMTDF trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SBGOF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 18.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SBGOF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SUTNY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 17.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SUTNY trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CRDIY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BNCZF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs PBLOF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKHPF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs ISNPY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while ISNPY trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs GPFOF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs AIBGY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 15.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while AIBGY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BDOUF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs GPFOY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs AIBRF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while AIBRF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs VLYPN Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while VLYPN trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SKCBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs SUGBY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs OTPBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs MDIBF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKRIF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKRIF trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs BKRIY Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while BKRIY trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.
FGFH vs CIMDF Comparison
FGFH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGFH stands at 111.04M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FGFH is priced at $30.70, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGFH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.38, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FGFH's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGFH is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGFH.