FFD Financial Corporation
FFD Financial Corporation FFDF Peers
See (FFDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFDF | $33.69 | +0.36% | 99.35M | 8.57 | $3.93 | +3.56% |
| UNCRY | $31.52 | -2.75% | 197.84B | 9.22 | $3.42 | +2.40% |
| CAIXY | $2.81 | -0.71% | 179.20B | 9.06 | $0.31 | +4.40% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.45 | -0.00% | 156.64B | 8.06 | $3.90 | +4.27% |
| CIHHF | $6.32 | +16.59% | 155.04B | 8.21 | $0.77 | +4.38% |
| UNCFF | $65.08 | +0.31% | 101.37B | 9.58 | $6.79 | +3.59% |
| DBSDY | $138.70 | +1.32% | 98.60B | 6.40 | $21.66 | +4.06% |
| BNPQY | $43.14 | -1.62% | 97.46B | 8.09 | $5.33 | +5.14% |
| DBSDF | $34.36 | +1.01% | 97.30B | 6.35 | $5.41 | +4.15% |
Stock Comparison
FFDF vs UNCRY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 197.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while UNCRY trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CAIXY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 179.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CAIXY trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKAYY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CIHKY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 156.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CIHKY trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CIHHF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 155.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CIHHF trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs UNCFF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 101.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while UNCFF trades at $65.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs DBSDY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 98.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while DBSDY trades at $138.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BNPQY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 97.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BNPQY trades at $43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs DBSDF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 97.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while DBSDF trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs IITSF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 96.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while IITSF trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BNPQF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 94.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BNPQF trades at $83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SBKFF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs KBCSY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 78.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while KBCSY trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PBCRF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 73.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PBCRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PBCRY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 73.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PBCRY trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs MZHOF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 67.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while MZHOF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs AKSJF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PSBKF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 62.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs LLOBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 62.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs EBKDY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while EBKDY trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CIXPF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 61.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CIXPF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs LLDTF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while LLDTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CRARF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 58.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CRARF trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs OVCHY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 57.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while OVCHY trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs OVCHF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while OVCHF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CRARY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 55.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CRARY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CHCJY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 55.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CHCJY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CHBJF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs NBNKF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while NBNKF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs NRDBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while NRDBY trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs UOVEF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs STNDF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs UOVEY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while UOVEY trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BHKLY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 45.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BHKLY trades at $85.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BNKHF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BNKHF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SCGLY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SCGLY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs DNBBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while DNBBF trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKRKY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 40.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKRKY trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs DNBBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while DNBBY trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKRKF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 40.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKRKF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SCGLF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 39.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SCGLF trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs KBCSF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 38.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while KBCSF trades at $97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SVKEF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CWESF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CRZBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CRZBY trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CRZBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CRZBF trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs JPSTF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs JPPTY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs DNKEY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 32.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while DNKEY trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs EBKOF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while EBKOF trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PPERY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 30.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PPERY trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CEBCF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 30.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SWDBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SWDBY trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SWDBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 29.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SWDBF trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs JPHLF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs MLYBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while MLYBY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs MLYNF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs DNSKF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs JPPHY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while JPPHY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PSZKY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 26.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PSZKY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PPERF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 26.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PPERF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs HSNGY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while HSNGY trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PSZKF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PSZKF trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs GBOOY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while GBOOY trades at $45.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BDORY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 25.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BDORY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CMAKY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 24.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CMAKY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs HSNGF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs GBOOF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 24.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while GBOOF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs FCNCB Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 23.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while FCNCB trades at $1,626.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BLMIF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 23.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BLMIF trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CGMBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CKHGY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CKHGY trades at $96.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BPXXY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKHYY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKHYY trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SGBLY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SGBLY trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SBGOF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 20.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SBGOF trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs RSNHF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 19.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while RSNHF trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CKHGF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CMTDF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CMTDF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs MDIBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while MDIBY trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SUTNY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SUTNY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CRDIY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs PBLOF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKHPF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs GPFOF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs AIBRF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while AIBRF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs AIBGY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while AIBGY trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs ISNPY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while ISNPY trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BDOUF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs GPFOY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SKCBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs SUGBY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs VLYPN Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while VLYPN trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BNCZF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs OTPBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs MDIBF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKRIY Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKRIY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs BKRIF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while BKRIF trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.
FFDF vs CIMDF Comparison
FFDF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFDF stands at 99.35M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FFDF is priced at $33.69, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FFDF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFDF is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFDF.