Lyxor Portfolio Strategy Defensiv UCITS ETF (Vermoegensstrategie)
Lyxor Portfolio Strategy Defensiv UCITS ETF (Vermoegensstrategie) F702.DE Peers
See (F702.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F702.DE | $131.96 | +0.40% | 31.04M | 17.68 | $7.46 | +1.06% |
| 0P00000MO4.F | $348.90 | -0.15% | 2.92T | 16.60 | $21.02 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | $302.18 | -0.15% | 2.53T | 16.60 | $18.20 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | $286.54 | +0.27% | 2.40T | 14.22 | $20.16 | N/A |
| 3SUR.DE | $1,825.60 | +0.68% | 493.63B | N/A | N/A | +1.11% |
| BBN1.F | $131.76 | +0.11% | 161.32B | 44.66 | $2.95 | +3.08% |
| BLQA.DE | $845.50 | -0.62% | 125.24B | 23.42 | $36.10 | +1.35% |
| ZPDW.DE | $71.54 | +0.34% | 111.00B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | $566.18 | +0.74% | 101.52B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | $100.96 | +0.73% | 92.33B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
F702.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.92T. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at $348.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.53T. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at $302.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.40T. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at $286.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs 3SUR.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 3SUR.DE has a market cap of 493.63B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 3SUR.DE trades at $1,825.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 3SUR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SUR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to 3SUR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 161.32B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while BBN1.F trades at $131.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.24B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while BLQA.DE trades at $845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 111.00B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while ZPDW.DE trades at $71.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 101.52B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SXR8.DE trades at $566.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 92.33B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EUNL.DE trades at $100.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 64.12B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VUSA.DE trades at $100.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 63.64B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VUAA.DE trades at $101.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 50.32B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SXRZ.DE trades at $235.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 40.76B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XJSE.DE trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.31B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VGWL.DE trades at $129.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 33.33B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VWCE.DE trades at $130.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VGWL.F trades at $102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.82B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while A4S.DE trades at $275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 27.34B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at $1,054.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs P500.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 27.30B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while P500.DE trades at $1,052.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 25.32B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SPPE.DE trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.64B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IBC3.F trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.32B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IS3N.DE trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 22.69B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SPY5.DE trades at $531.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.73B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IBC3.DE trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.07B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while TR1.DU trades at $86.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 18.40B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while PPFB.SG trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 18.36B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 6TVM.DE trades at $54.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 18.30B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while LYP2.DE trades at $293.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 17.99B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XDWD.DE trades at $110.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 17.99B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XDWL.DE trades at $92.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.60B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IUSA.DE trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 14.48B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SXRV.DE trades at $1,096.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IUSZ.DE trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.52B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IUSQ.DE trades at $83.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11.08B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SPPW.DE trades at $36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XDEW.DE trades at $87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XDEE.DE trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.07B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while DWS.DE trades at $50.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10.07B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EUNK.DE trades at $86.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.89B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while QDVE.DE trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EUN5.DE trades at $120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.49B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while OM3L.DE trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.37B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.35B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while H4ZJ.DE trades at $34.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.32B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while LYYA.DE trades at $344.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EGV2.DE trades at $101.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 8.99B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while STXH.DE trades at $141.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IQQY.DE trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while LYP6.DE trades at $261.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 8.64B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while JREU.DE trades at $52.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.50B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EXS1.DE trades at $197.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.50B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EXIC.DE trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XD9D.DE trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while D5BM.DE trades at $106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XD9U.DE trades at $155.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 8.36B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XD9E.DE trades at $120.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.36B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XS5E.DE trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EXW1.DE trades at $55.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at $63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.02B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EXSA.DE trades at $55.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EXIE.DE trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SGAS.DE trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EQQQ.DE trades at $468.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IQQW.DE trades at $73.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VGVE.DE trades at $99.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.43B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VGVF.DE trades at $103.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EDMU.DE trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XZMU.DE trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XWEH.DE trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while 2B7K.DE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while DBXE.DE trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VGWD.DE trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while DBXW.DE trades at $108.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs LCUW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while LCUW.DE trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EXIC.F trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at $53.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.52B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while H4ZF.DE trades at $53.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while DBXD.DE trades at $223.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XMME.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XMME.F trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while TCC4.DE trades at $222.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs DBXU.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while DBXU.DE trades at $173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IBCF.DE trades at $124.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs AUM5.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while AUM5.DE trades at $104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs H1D5.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while H1D5.DE trades at $142.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XMME.DE trades at $55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while XIEE.DE trades at $78.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SC0J.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SC0J.DE trades at $108.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 5.47B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SPP1.DE trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE and SPP1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.38).
F702.DE vs AMEW.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while AMEW.DE trades at $551.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs QDV5.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, QDV5.DE has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while QDV5.DE trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas QDV5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to QDV5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to QDV5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EMNU.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EMNU.DE has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EMNU.DE trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EMNU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EMNU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SC0J.F Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SC0J.F has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SC0J.F trades at $82.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SC0J.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SC0J.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SC0J.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EDM6.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EDM6.DE has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EDM6.DE trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EDM6.DE's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EDM6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EDM6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs VUKE.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, VUKE.DE has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while VUKE.DE trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas VUKE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to VUKE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to VUKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs EUNN.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, EUNN.DE has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while EUNN.DE trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas EUNN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to EUNN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs IE00BYML9W36.SG Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, IE00BYML9W36.SG has a market cap of 5.21B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while IE00BYML9W36.SG trades at $49.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas IE00BYML9W36.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs D500.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while D500.DE trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.
F702.DE vs SEAC.DE Comparison
F702.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, F702.DE stands at 31.04M. In comparison, SEAC.DE has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, F702.DE is priced at $131.96, while SEAC.DE trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
F702.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 17.68, whereas SEAC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, F702.DE's ROE is N/A, compared to SEAC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, F702.DE is less volatile compared to SEAC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for F702.DE.