EXEL Industries SA

EXE.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXE.PA stands at 236.73M. In comparison, CATR.PA has a market cap of 159.92B. Regarding current trading prices, EXE.PA is priced at $34.90, while CATR.PA trades at $327.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas CATR.PA's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, EXE.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CATR.PA's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EXE.PA is more volatile compared to CATR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXE.PA.

EXE.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXE.PA stands at 236.73M. In comparison, HYDRA.AS has a market cap of 214.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EXE.PA is priced at $34.90, while HYDRA.AS trades at $165.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas HYDRA.AS's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, EXE.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HYDRA.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EXE.PA is more volatile compared to HYDRA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXE.PA.

EXE.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXE.PA stands at 236.73M. In comparison, PIG.PA has a market cap of 80.43M. Regarding current trading prices, EXE.PA is priced at $34.90, while PIG.PA trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas PIG.PA's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, EXE.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PIG.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EXE.PA is more volatile compared to PIG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXE.PA.

EXE.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXE.PA stands at 236.73M. In comparison, ALWF.PA has a market cap of 8.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EXE.PA is priced at $34.90, while ALWF.PA trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas ALWF.PA's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, EXE.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALWF.PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EXE.PA is less volatile compared to ALWF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXE.PA.