Prospector Metals Corp.
Prospector Metals Corp. ETHOF Peers
See (ETHOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETHOF | $0.13 | -6.49% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.29 | +5.93% | 64.43B | 12.03 | $0.19 | +2.31% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $21.03 | -9.20% | 18.82B | 15.24 | $1.38 | +2.60% |
| NESRF | $12.30 | +2.07% | 17.58B | 23.65 | $0.52 | +1.71% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.42% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ETHOF vs ZIJMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 64.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ZIJMF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs OPYGY Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs GFIOF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 18.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while GFIOF trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs NESRF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while NESRF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs NSTYY Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs HCHDY Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs NCMGY Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs NCMGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs KOZAY Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs LUGDF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while LUGDF trades at $45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs CAHPF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while CAHPF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs HGMCF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ZHAOF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs AULGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs EDVMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while EDVMF trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -70.10. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs DGMLF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ARGTF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ARGTF trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -227.43. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs SBYSF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ZIJMY Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ZIJMY trades at $47.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs PMNXF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while PMNXF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs OCANF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while OCANF trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs TORXF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while TORXF trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs DPMLF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while DPMLF trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs CRNLF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RGRNF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RGRNF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs GRLGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while GRLGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs KNTNF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while KNTNF trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs GSISF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ELKMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ELKMF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs CELTF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RMLRF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RMLRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs WDOFF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while WDOFF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs CXBMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while CXBMF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs REDLF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs HCHDF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while HCHDF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs EOGSF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs WFRSF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ORAAF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ORAAF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs DRDGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs PAFRF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs OBNNF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs AURQF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs MAUTF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while MAUTF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -16.05. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs SVLKF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs MWSNF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 917.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while MWSNF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -75.32. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs SGSVF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs BELGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 872.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while BELGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs SNWGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 864.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while SNWGF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -38.43. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs KRRGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RUPRF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 860.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RUPRF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -183.85. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RMGGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 745.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RMGGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs PDIYF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 698.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while PDIYF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -26.65. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs WTGRF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RGDFF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs GUYGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 564.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while GUYGF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -78.22. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs MNSAF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 536.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while MNSAF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs NVMLF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ARNGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ORZCF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 417.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ORZCF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs KSKGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ASGOF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 401.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ASGOF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ECRTF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 401.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs LMGDF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 368.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while LMGDF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs TPRXF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RSRBF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 343.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RSRBF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RIOFF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RIOFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 77.80. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs MNDJF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 328.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while MNDJF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs PROBF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 326.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while PROBF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs THXPF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 326.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while THXPF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs FDMIF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 314.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while FDMIF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -36.72. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ALKEF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 287.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs MGDPF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs MAKOF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 276.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while MAKOF trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs RMLFF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 274.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while RMLFF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs OGNRF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 266.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while OGNRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs STBMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 257.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while STBMF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs OSIIF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ERRSF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs TTTNF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs ELEMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 248.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while ELEMF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs HSTXF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 198.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while HSTXF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs WRLGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 194.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while WRLGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs SAAGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs CNLMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs JAGGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 188.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while JAGGF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -29.63. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs SRBIF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 186.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while SRBIF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs DCCNF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs THSGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 178.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while THSGF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs CNMXF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs OMGGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 173.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while OMGGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -29.46. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs TETOF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, TETOF has a market cap of 167.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while TETOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TETOF's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to TETOF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to TETOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs GDRZF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 167.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while GDRZF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -14.80. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs STPGF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 164.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while STPGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs KFFLF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs GGAZF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 156.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while GGAZF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.28. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs EEYMF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs AGXKF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs DNGDF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 143.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while DNGDF trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.
ETHOF vs NVOOF Comparison
ETHOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETHOF stands at N/A. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ETHOF is priced at $0.13, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETHOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, ETHOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETHOF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETHOF.