E79 Resources Corp.
E79 Resources Corp. ESNR.CN Peers
See (ESNR.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESNR.CN | $0.07 | -6.67% | 4.56M | -0.78 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| TECK-A.TO | $49.50 | -2.27% | 25.08B | 707.14 | $0.07 | +0.99% |
| TECK-B.TO | $49.44 | -1.18% | 24.50B | 706.29 | $0.07 | +2.02% |
| IVN.TO | $13.19 | +0.84% | 17.84B | 29.31 | $0.45 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | $8.86 | -0.56% | 5.68B | 9.53 | $0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | $32.25 | -1.01% | 4.37B | -31.01 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | $14.12 | +15.74% | 2.92B | -36.21 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | $17.58 | +2.63% | 2.01B | -11.49 | -$1.53 | N/A |
| ALS.TO | $27.71 | +0.58% | 1.28B | 12.89 | $2.15 | +1.31% |
| FOM.TO | $3.06 | +0.66% | 1.27B | -61.20 | -$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ESNR.CN vs TECK-A.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 25.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TECK-A.TO trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 707.14. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TECK-A.TO has daily volatility of 1.98.
ESNR.CN vs TECK-B.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 24.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TECK-B.TO trades at $49.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 706.29. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TECK-B.TO has daily volatility of 1.67.
ESNR.CN vs IVN.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 17.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while IVN.TO trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IVN.TO has daily volatility of 4.43.
ESNR.CN vs AKE.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AKE.TO trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AKE.TO has daily volatility of 4.07.
ESNR.CN vs FIL.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FIL.TO trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FIL.TO has daily volatility of 0.65.
ESNR.CN vs NGEX.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NGEX.TO trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -36.21. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NGEX.TO has daily volatility of 14.24.
ESNR.CN vs SKE.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SKE.TO trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SKE.TO has daily volatility of 4.27.
ESNR.CN vs ALS.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ALS.TO trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ALS.TO has daily volatility of 1.70.
ESNR.CN vs FOM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FOM.TO trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -61.20. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FOM.TO has daily volatility of 2.44.
ESNR.CN vs VZLA.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while VZLA.TO trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -123.67. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VZLA.TO has daily volatility of 3.68.
ESNR.CN vs LAC.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 834.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LAC.TO trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAC.TO has daily volatility of 4.39.
ESNR.CN vs NDM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 721.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NDM.TO trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NDM.TO has daily volatility of 5.84.
ESNR.CN vs AII.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 691.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AII.TO trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AII.TO has daily volatility of 2.90.
ESNR.CN vs MDI.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 671.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while MDI.TO trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MDI.TO has daily volatility of 2.53.
ESNR.CN vs LAAC.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LAAC.TO trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAAC.TO has daily volatility of 6.24.
ESNR.CN vs POM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while POM.TO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and POM.TO has daily volatility of 5.80.
ESNR.CN vs USA.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 534.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while USA.TO trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and USA.TO has daily volatility of 4.88.
ESNR.CN vs FVL.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 528.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FVL.TO trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FVL.TO has daily volatility of 6.00.
ESNR.CN vs ETG.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 463.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ETG.TO trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -31.93. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ETG.TO has daily volatility of 1.79.
ESNR.CN vs SOLG.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SOLG.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SOLG.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs ERD.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 341.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ERD.TO trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ERD.TO has daily volatility of 2.13.
ESNR.CN vs LUCA.V Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 338.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LUCA.V trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -16.37. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LUCA.V has daily volatility of 10.77.
ESNR.CN vs PMET.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 336.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while PMET.TO trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -53.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PMET.TO has daily volatility of 4.18.
ESNR.CN vs WRN.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 324.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while WRN.TO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WRN.TO has daily volatility of 3.77.
ESNR.CN vs LIRC.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 313.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LIRC.TO trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -80.29. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIRC.TO has daily volatility of 3.22.
ESNR.CN vs TMQ.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 285.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TMQ.TO trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -24.86. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TMQ.TO has daily volatility of 6.13.
ESNR.CN vs LIFT.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 275.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LIFT.CN trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIFT.CN has daily volatility of 2.69.
ESNR.CN vs ECOR.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 270.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ECOR.TO trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ECOR.TO has daily volatility of 3.60.
ESNR.CN vs GLO.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 255.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while GLO.TO trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GLO.TO has daily volatility of 5.92.
ESNR.CN vs SMT.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 243.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SMT.TO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SMT.TO has daily volatility of 0.87.
ESNR.CN vs TLG.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 237.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TLG.TO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLG.TO has daily volatility of 1.60.
ESNR.CN vs MNO.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 235.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while MNO.TO trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MNO.TO has daily volatility of 2.94.
ESNR.CN vs PRYM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 200.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while PRYM.TO trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PRYM.TO has daily volatility of 5.69.
ESNR.CN vs FAR.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 181.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FAR.TO trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FAR.TO has daily volatility of 1.09.
ESNR.CN vs IBAT.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 179.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while IBAT.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IBAT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs GEO.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 167.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while GEO.TO trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GEO.TO has daily volatility of 6.15.
ESNR.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 160.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LAM.TO trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAM.TO has daily volatility of 6.45.
ESNR.CN vs AMC.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 158.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AMC.TO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AMC.TO has daily volatility of 3.02.
ESNR.CN vs ARA.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 158.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ARA.TO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARA.TO has daily volatility of 10.07.
ESNR.CN vs TLO.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 140.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TLO.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLO.TO has daily volatility of 3.39.
ESNR.CN vs CDPR.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while CDPR.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CDPR.CN has daily volatility of 1.98.
ESNR.CN vs NB.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NB.TO trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NB.TO has daily volatility of 23.60.
ESNR.CN vs LGO.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 114.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LGO.TO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LGO.TO has daily volatility of 3.30.
ESNR.CN vs AOT.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 111.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AOT.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AOT.TO has daily volatility of 6.45.
ESNR.CN vs MOLY.NE Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 104.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while MOLY.NE trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MOLY.NE has daily volatility of 2.27.
ESNR.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 101.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FSY.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FSY.TO has daily volatility of 8.00.
ESNR.CN vs TI.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 80.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TI.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TI.TO has daily volatility of 6.56.
ESNR.CN vs GMX.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 80.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while GMX.TO trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GMX.TO has daily volatility of 4.23.
ESNR.CN vs FURY.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 80.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FURY.TO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FURY.TO has daily volatility of 2.96.
ESNR.CN vs SLR.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 72.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SLR.TO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SLR.TO has daily volatility of 1.13.
ESNR.CN vs S.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 71.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while S.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and S.TO has daily volatility of 3.39.
ESNR.CN vs SAU.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 65.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SAU.TO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAU.TO has daily volatility of 7.41.
ESNR.CN vs NVLH.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NVLH.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NVLH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs WM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 60.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while WM.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WM.TO has daily volatility of 9.52.
ESNR.CN vs TSK.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 56.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TSK.TO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -4.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TSK.TO has daily volatility of 1.02.
ESNR.CN vs GENM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 55.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while GENM.TO trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GENM.TO has daily volatility of 6.19.
ESNR.CN vs OGD.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 51.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while OGD.TO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and OGD.TO has daily volatility of 2.18.
ESNR.CN vs ARS.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 48.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ARS.CN trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARS.CN has daily volatility of 15.93.
ESNR.CN vs VROY.V Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 48.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while VROY.V trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VROY.V has daily volatility of 9.91.
ESNR.CN vs MIN.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while MIN.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MIN.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs RUA.V Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 42.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while RUA.V trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RUA.V has daily volatility of 4.26.
ESNR.CN vs FOX.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 41.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FOX.CN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FOX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs RUA.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while RUA.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RUA.CN has daily volatility of 5.71.
ESNR.CN vs BKI.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 39.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while BKI.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BKI.TO has daily volatility of 11.32.
ESNR.CN vs RTG.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 39.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while RTG.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RTG.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs VALU.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while VALU.CN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VALU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs TOC.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TOC.CN trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TOC.CN has daily volatility of 1.50.
ESNR.CN vs NCF.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 36.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NCF.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NCF.TO has daily volatility of 16.67.
ESNR.CN vs NICO.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 34.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NICO.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NICO.CN has daily volatility of 8.22.
ESNR.CN vs FT.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 31.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while FT.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FT.TO has daily volatility of 16.67.
ESNR.CN vs NEXT.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 30.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NEXT.TO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NEXT.TO has daily volatility of 18.18.
ESNR.CN vs EGFV.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while EGFV.CN trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EGFV.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs AMPS.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AMPS.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AMPS.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs AAN.V Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 24.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AAN.V trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AAN.V has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs URNM.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while URNM.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and URNM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs EXN.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while EXN.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EXN.TO has daily volatility of 10.91.
ESNR.CN vs AVL.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 18.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while AVL.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AVL.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs LVL.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LVL.CN trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
ESNR.CN vs VOY.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while VOY.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VOY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs TN.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 17.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TN.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TN.CN has daily volatility of 14.29.
ESNR.CN vs ASND.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 17.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ASND.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ASND.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs SAM.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 16.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SAM.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAM.TO has daily volatility of 2.06.
ESNR.CN vs WRX.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while WRX.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WRX.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs SX.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 15.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SX.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SX.CN has daily volatility of 18.18.
ESNR.CN vs SUPR.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SUPR.CN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -116.77%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SUPR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs TICO.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 14.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while TICO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TICO.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs COSA.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while COSA.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and COSA.CN has daily volatility of 3.28.
ESNR.CN vs MAXX.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 12.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while MAXX.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MAXX.CN has daily volatility of 4.65.
ESNR.CN vs SCY.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SCY.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SCY.TO has daily volatility of 15.38.
ESNR.CN vs PM.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 12.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while PM.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PM.CN has daily volatility of 10.91.
ESNR.CN vs PEK.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while PEK.CN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PEK.CN has daily volatility of 18.75.
ESNR.CN vs NXU.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while NXU.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NXU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs ELEF.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, ELEF.TO has a market cap of 10.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while ELEF.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas ELEF.TO's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ELEF.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ELEF.TO has daily volatility of 9.09.
ESNR.CN vs SVB.TO Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 10.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SVB.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SVB.TO has daily volatility of 7.23.
ESNR.CN vs LIM.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while LIM.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs SLV.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 9.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while SLV.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SLV.CN has daily volatility of 2.74.
ESNR.CN vs CELL.V Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, CELL.V has a market cap of 9.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while CELL.V trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas CELL.V's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CELL.V's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CELL.V has daily volatility of 18.18.
ESNR.CN vs GAMA.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while GAMA.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GAMA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
ESNR.CN vs GDIG.CN Comparison
ESNR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESNR.CN stands at 4.56M. In comparison, GDIG.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ESNR.CN is priced at $0.07, while GDIG.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESNR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.78, whereas GDIG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, ESNR.CN's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GDIG.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ESNR.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GDIG.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.