Eqonex Limited
Eqonex Limited EQOS Peers
See (EQOS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQOS | $0.09 | -33.88% | 0 | -0.07 | -$1.36 | N/A |
| MS-PE | $25.48 | +0.28% | 225.4B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PF | $25.23 | +0.12% | 225B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PI | $25.04 | +0.00% | 225B | 3.19 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PK | $23.98 | -0.48% | 225B | 3.07 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS | $140.15 | -0.48% | 224.6B | 15.91 | $8.83 | +2.63% |
| MS-PA | $21.83 | -0.41% | 224.5B | 2.78 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| GS-PD | $21.61 | +0.32% | 217.7B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.69% |
| GS-PC | $21.94 | +0.37% | 217.5B | 1.75 | $12.53 | +1.69% |
| GS-PA | $22.04 | +0.16% | 217.3B | 0.43 | $51.53 | +1.69% |
Stock Comparison
EQOS vs MS-PE Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 225.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PE trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 225B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PF trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PI Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 225B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PI trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PK Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 225B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PK trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 224.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS trades at $140.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PA Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 224.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PA trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GS-PD Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 217.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GS-PD trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GS-PC Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GS-PC trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GS-PA Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 217.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GS-PA trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GS Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 216.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GS trades at $702.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SCHW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SCHW trades at $95.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SCHW-PD Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GS-PJ Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GS-PK Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PQ Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PQ trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PP trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs RJF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while RJF trades at $160.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PL Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PL trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs TW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while TW trades at $135.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 55.55. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs LPLA Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while LPLA trades at $377.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MS-PO Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MS-PO trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs IBKR Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while IBKR trades at $62.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs NMR Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while NMR trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs HLI Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while HLI trades at $195.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs JEF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while JEF trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs EVR Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while EVR trades at $295.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SF-PB Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SF-PB trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SF trades at $110.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs FRHC Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while FRHC trades at $167.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 126.31. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs XP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while XP trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SCE-PJ Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SCE-PJ trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MKTX Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MKTX trades at $210.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MARA Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MARA trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs VIRT Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while VIRT trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs PIPR Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while PIPR trades at $316.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs RJF-PA Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs RJF-PB Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while RJF-PB trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MC Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MC trades at $70.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs LAZ Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while LAZ trades at $53.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs BGC Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while BGC trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SNEX Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SNEX trades at $94.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs PJT Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while PJT trades at $184.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs IREN Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while IREN trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -58.55. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs FUTU Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while FUTU trades at $163.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MRX Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MRX trades at $38.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs HUT Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while HUT trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -32.33. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SF-PC Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SF-PC trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs CIFR Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while CIFR trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs CIFRW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while CIFRW trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs WULF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while WULF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SF-PD Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SF-PD trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs TIGR Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while TIGR trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs PWP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while PWP trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -94.81. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs BGCP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs DFIN Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while DFIN trades at $62.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs HKIB Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs COWN Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs BTBT Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 941.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while BTBT trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs AC Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 790.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while AC trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs OPY Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 746.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while OPY trades at $72.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs FUFU Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while FUFU trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 417.00. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs FUFUW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 633.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while FUFUW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs BITF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 628.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while BITF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs AMRK Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 543.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while AMRK trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs HIVE Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while HIVE trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -113.50. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs COHN Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 311.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while COHN trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GHL Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SWIN Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SWIN trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs PROP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while PROP trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs WHG Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while WHG trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 425.00. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SIEB Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SIEB trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs BTCS Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while BTCS trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MFH Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MFH trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs BTM Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while BTM trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -36.27. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs CLSKW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while CLSKW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SRL Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SRL trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs TCJH Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GRYP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GRYP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs HGBL Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while HGBL trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GRDI Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs PLUT Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while PLUT trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -67.40. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs TOP Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while TOP trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MDBH Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MDBH trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SDIG Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GREE Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GREE trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs ARBK Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while ARBK trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs NCPLW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while NCPLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SAI Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MIGI Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MIGI trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs ABTS Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while ABTS trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GSIW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GSIW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs ATIF Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs NCPL Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while NCPL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs MEGL Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while MEGL trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs WAI Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while WAI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs LGHLW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs GRDIW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.
EQOS vs SAITW Comparison
EQOS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQOS stands at 0. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EQOS is priced at $0.09, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, EQOS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQOS is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQOS.