Everyman Media Group plc
Everyman Media Group plc EMAN.L Peers
See (EMAN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMAN.L | $40.50 | -0.69% | 36.93M | -4.50 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| 0XWG.L | $4.40 | +1.38% | 268.25M | 40.00 | $0.11 | N/A |
| DTVL.L | $0.10 | N/A | 184.13M | -0.77 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| CCPA.L | $180.50 | -5.26% | 171.26M | 0.12 | $14.70 | +0.02% |
| CCP.L | $145.00 | +0.69% | 137.57M | 8.06 | $0.18 | N/A |
| CCPC.L | $371.00 | N/A | 136.63M | 0.25 | $14.70 | N/A |
| TMO.L | $31.00 | -1.61% | 110.77M | -15.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| 0QL0.L | $9.40 | -18.27% | 84.21M | -21.36 | -$0.44 | N/A |
| 0M1G.L | $100.75 | +1.62% | 74.59M | 42.19 | $2.39 | N/A |
| ZIN.L | $61.50 | -1.60% | 15.18M | -30.75 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EMAN.L vs 0XWG.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, 0XWG.L has a market cap of 268.25M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while 0XWG.L trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0XWG.L's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 0XWG.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to 0XWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs DTVL.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, DTVL.L has a market cap of 184.13M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while DTVL.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DTVL.L's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DTVL.L's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to DTVL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs CCPA.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, CCPA.L has a market cap of 171.26M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while CCPA.L trades at $180.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CCPA.L's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CCPA.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to CCPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs CCP.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, CCP.L has a market cap of 137.57M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while CCP.L trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CCP.L's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CCP.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to CCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs CCPC.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, CCPC.L has a market cap of 136.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while CCPC.L trades at $371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CCPC.L's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CCPC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to CCPC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs TMO.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, TMO.L has a market cap of 110.77M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while TMO.L trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas TMO.L's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TMO.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to TMO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs 0QL0.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, 0QL0.L has a market cap of 84.21M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while 0QL0.L trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0QL0.L's P/E ratio is -21.36. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 0QL0.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to 0QL0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs 0M1G.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, 0M1G.L has a market cap of 74.59M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while 0M1G.L trades at $100.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas 0M1G.L's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 0M1G.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EMAN.L has daily volatility of 1.92 and 0M1G.L has daily volatility of N/A.
EMAN.L vs ZIN.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, ZIN.L has a market cap of 15.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while ZIN.L trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ZIN.L's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ZIN.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to ZIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs IMMO.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, IMMO.L has a market cap of 14.46M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while IMMO.L trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas IMMO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IMMO.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to IMMO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs HUD.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, HUD.L has a market cap of 10.51M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while HUD.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HUD.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HUD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to HUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs OMIP.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, OMIP.L has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while OMIP.L trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas OMIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to OMIP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to OMIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs BONH.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, BONH.L has a market cap of 5.62M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while BONH.L trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BONH.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BONH.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to BONH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs RHM.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, RHM.L has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while RHM.L trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas RHM.L's P/E ratio is 114.50. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RHM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EMAN.L has daily volatility of 1.92 and RHM.L has daily volatility of N/A.
EMAN.L vs AEO.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, AEO.L has a market cap of 4.46M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while AEO.L trades at $46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AEO.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to AEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs LVCG.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, LVCG.L has a market cap of 779772.00. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while LVCG.L trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas LVCG.L's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LVCG.L's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to LVCG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs CINE.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, CINE.L has a market cap of 686715.00. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while CINE.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CINE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CINE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to CINE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs GILD.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, GILD.L has a market cap of 643987.00. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while GILD.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GILD.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GILD.L's ROE of +4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is less volatile compared to GILD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.
EMAN.L vs MIRA.L Comparison
EMAN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN.L stands at 36.93M. In comparison, MIRA.L has a market cap of 267252.00. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN.L is priced at $40.50, while MIRA.L trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas MIRA.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EMAN.L's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MIRA.L's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN.L is more volatile compared to MIRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.L.