Elmer Bancorp, Inc.
Elmer Bancorp, Inc. ELMA Peers
See (ELMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELMA | $21.63 | +2.51% | 26.38M | 8.65 | $2.50 | +2.31% |
| UNCRY | $32.10 | +1.89% | 200.03B | 9.50 | $3.38 | +2.38% |
| CAIXY | $2.79 | -0.72% | 178.16B | 9.00 | $0.31 | +4.41% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.18 | -0.41% | 154.95B | 7.97 | $3.91 | +4.32% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 126.06B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| BNPQY | $43.46 | +3.40% | 103.95B | 8.18 | $5.31 | +5.05% |
| BNPQF | $91.25 | +2.64% | 103.07B | 8.59 | $10.62 | +10.10% |
| UNCFF | $65.90 | +1.70% | 102.66B | 9.76 | $6.75 | +3.58% |
| IITSF | $5.77 | +1.94% | 102.58B | 10.30 | $0.56 | +9.28% |
Stock Comparison
ELMA vs UNCRY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 200.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while UNCRY trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CAIXY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 178.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CAIXY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BKAYY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CIHKY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 154.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CIHKY trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CIHHF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 126.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BNPQY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 103.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BNPQY trades at $43.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BNPQF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 103.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BNPQF trades at $91.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs UNCFF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 102.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while UNCFF trades at $65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs IITSF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 102.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while IITSF trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs DBSDY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 97.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while DBSDY trades at $137.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs DBSDF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 96.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while DBSDF trades at $33.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SBKFF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs KBCSY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 78.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while KBCSY trades at $49.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs PBCRY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 71.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PBCRY trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs AKSJF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs PBCRF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 65.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PBCRF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and PBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs MZHOF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 64.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while MZHOF trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and MZHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs PSBKF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 63.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PSBKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs EBKDY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while EBKDY trades at $40.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs LLDTF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs LLOBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 59.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CRARF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 58.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CRARF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CRARY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CRARY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs OVCHY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while OVCHY trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs OVCHF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while OVCHF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CIXPF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 55.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CIXPF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CHBJF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 55.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CHBJF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs NRDBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while NRDBY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs NBNKF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while NBNKF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs UOVEF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs STNDF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs BHKLY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 46.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BHKLY trades at $87.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs UOVEY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while UOVEY trades at $55.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CHCJY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 44.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CHCJY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and CHCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs SCGLY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 43.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SCGLY trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BNKHF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BNKHF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BKRKF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 40.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKRKF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and BKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs DNBBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while DNBBF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs DNBBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 39.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while DNBBY trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SCGLF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 39.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SCGLF trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs BKRKY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 38.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKRKY trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs KBCSF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 37.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while KBCSF trades at $95.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs SVKEF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CWESF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CRZBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CRZBY trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CRZBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CRZBF trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs JPSTF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and JPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs JPPTY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs DNKEY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while DNKEY trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs EBKOF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while EBKOF trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CEBCF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs PPERY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 31.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PPERY trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs PPERF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 30.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PPERF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and PPERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs SWDBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SWDBF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and SWDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs MLYBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while MLYBY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SWDBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SWDBY trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs JPHLF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs MLYNF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs JPPHY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 28.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while JPPHY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs DNSKF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs PSZKY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 27.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PSZKY trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and PSZKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs CMAKY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 27.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CMAKY trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and CMAKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs PSZKF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PSZKF trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs HSNGY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while HSNGY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BDORY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 25.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BDORY trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs GBOOY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while GBOOY trades at $45.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs FCNCB Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while FCNCB trades at $1,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs GBOOF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while GBOOF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs HSNGF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs BLMIF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BLMIF trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CGMBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CKHGY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CKHGY trades at $96.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and CKHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs BPXXY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SBGOF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 21.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SBGOF trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and SBGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs BKHYY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKHYY trades at $80.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SGBLY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SGBLY trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs MDIBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while MDIBY trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CMTDF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 18.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CMTDF trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SUTNY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SUTNY trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs RSNHF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 18.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while RSNHF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CRDIY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs PBLOF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and PBLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs ISNPY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while ISNPY trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BKHPF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs GPFOF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs AIBGY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 15.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while AIBGY trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BDOUF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs GPFOY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs AIBRF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while AIBRF trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs VLYPN Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while VLYPN trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SKCBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs SUGBY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BNCZF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs OTPBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ELMA vs MDIBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BKPKF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 12.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKPKF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs BKRIY Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while BKRIY trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs CIMDF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.
ELMA vs FCBBF Comparison
ELMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMA stands at 26.38M. In comparison, FCBBF has a market cap of 12.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMA is priced at $21.63, while FCBBF trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas FCBBF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, ELMA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCBBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMA is less volatile compared to FCBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMA.