Eaton Vance Floating-Rate 2022 Target Term Trust

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, PLXNF has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while PLXNF trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas PLXNF's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLXNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to PLXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, HASI has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while HASI trades at $26.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas HASI's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HASI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to HASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, MSTI has a market cap of 67.61M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while MSTI trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas MSTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is more volatile compared to MSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, PQDI has a market cap of 56.75M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while PQDI trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas PQDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PQDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to PQDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, JIB has a market cap of 33.86M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while JIB trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas JIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to JIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, NTKI has a market cap of 12.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while NTKI trades at $19.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas NTKI's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is more volatile compared to NTKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, CHIS has a market cap of 7.66M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while CHIS trades at $14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas CHIS's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to CHIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, SNPV has a market cap of 7.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while SNPV trades at $30.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas SNPV's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNPV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to SNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, ISZE has a market cap of 5.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while ISZE trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas ISZE's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ISZE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is more volatile compared to ISZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, PGAL has a market cap of 5.37M. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while PGAL trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas PGAL's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PGAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to PGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, KARB has a market cap of 844922.00. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while KARB trades at $28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas KARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to KARB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, MRAD has a market cap of 768765.00. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while MRAD trades at $15.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas MRAD's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MRAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to MRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, JHB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while JHB trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas JHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JHB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is more volatile compared to JHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, ENVIW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while ENVIW trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas ENVIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENVIW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is less volatile compared to ENVIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, GRNR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while GRNR trades at $22.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas GRNR's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is more volatile compared to GRNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.

EFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFL stands at 204.35M. In comparison, CSGNF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, EFL is priced at $8.63, while CSGNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.18, whereas CSGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFL's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSGNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EFL is more volatile compared to CSGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFL.