Dr. Martens plc

DOCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DOCS.L stands at 556.12M. In comparison, 0RUJ.L has a market cap of 325.16M. Regarding current trading prices, DOCS.L is priced at $57.65, while 0RUJ.L trades at $45.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DOCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas 0RUJ.L's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, DOCS.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RUJ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DOCS.L is more volatile compared to 0RUJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOCS.L.

DOCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DOCS.L stands at 556.12M. In comparison, 0QP3.L has a market cap of 129.93M. Regarding current trading prices, DOCS.L is priced at $57.65, while 0QP3.L trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DOCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas 0QP3.L's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, DOCS.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QP3.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DOCS.L is more volatile compared to 0QP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOCS.L.

DOCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DOCS.L stands at 556.12M. In comparison, MUL.L has a market cap of 57.79M. Regarding current trading prices, DOCS.L is priced at $57.65, while MUL.L trades at $82.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DOCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas MUL.L's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, DOCS.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUL.L's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, DOCS.L is more volatile compared to MUL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOCS.L.

DOCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DOCS.L stands at 556.12M. In comparison, PTD.L has a market cap of 786645.00. Regarding current trading prices, DOCS.L is priced at $57.65, while PTD.L trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DOCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.22, whereas PTD.L's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, DOCS.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTD.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DOCS.L is more volatile compared to PTD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DOCS.L.