Central Wireless, Inc.
Central Wireless, Inc. CWIR Peers
See (CWIR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWIR | $0.00 | N/A | 19542.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | N/A | 28.53T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGY | $35.58 | +0.54% | 175.53B | 13.95 | $2.55 | +2.95% |
| DTEGF | $35.40 | -2.99% | 173.48B | 13.77 | $2.57 | +3.18% |
| CHWRF | $1.42 | +846.67% | 139.64B | 17.75 | $0.08 | +0.48% |
| NPPXF | $1.10 | +3.52% | 90.79B | 12.19 | $0.09 | +3.25% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.90B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.80% |
| NTTYY | $26.01 | +0.19% | 86.08B | 12.88 | $2.02 | +1.25% |
| KDDIF | $19.79 | +10.99% | 78.73B | 18.67 | $1.06 | +2.43% |
| SFTBY | $27.03 | +0.52% | 77.72B | 10.28 | $2.63 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
CWIR vs AXTLF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 28.53T. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs DTEGY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 175.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while DTEGY trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs DTEGF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 173.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while DTEGF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs CHWRF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 139.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while CHWRF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs NPPXF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 90.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while NPPXF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs CUCSY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs NTTYY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 86.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while NTTYY trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs KDDIF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 78.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while KDDIF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SFTBY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 77.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SFTBY trades at $27.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SFTBF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 77.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SFTBF trades at $53.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs KDDIY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 73.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while KDDIY trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AMXVF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SFBQF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 71.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SFBQF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AMOVF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AARTY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 94.19. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs CLLNY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 50.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while CLLNY trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -449.50. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SNGNF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SNGNF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is -299.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SGAPY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 47.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SGAPY trades at $28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is -482.83. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs FNCTF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 37.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while FNCTF trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLGPY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 33.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLGPY trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TTRAF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 33.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TTRAF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SCMWY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 32.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SCMWY trades at $63.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SWZCF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 32.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SWZCF trades at $635.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AVIFY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 27.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AVIFY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TEFOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 26.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TEFOF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AVIKF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs CTOWY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 25.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs VODPF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 22.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while VODPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BTGOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 20.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BTGOF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BCEPF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 20.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BCEPF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TELNF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 19.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TELNF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TELNY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 19.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TELNY trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs KKPNF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while KKPNF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AVIVF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs KKPNY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 17.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while KKPNY trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs HLTOY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while HLTOY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SJRWF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs ELMUY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while ELMUY trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs RCIAF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while RCIAF trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLSNF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLSNF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLSNY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLSNY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs VDMCY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 13.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while VDMCY trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLKMF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 13.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLKMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs LBRDB Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 13.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while LBRDB trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TCPFF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TCPFF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs HKTTY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while HKTTY trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BCPPF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 11.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BGAOY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 11.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BGAOY trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TELDY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs MTNOY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while MTNOY trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs VODAF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BECEF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs MTNOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while MTNOF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLTZY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLTZY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs FRTAY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while FRTAY trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLTZF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BCEXF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TIAOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TIAIY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TIAIY trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs DIGBF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TIAJF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs ELMUF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SHNUF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SHNUF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs HKTTF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while HKTTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TELDF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TELDF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SOBKY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SOBKY trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs PCCWY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while PCCWY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -161.20. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs MYTEF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs HLTOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs QBCRF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while QBCRF trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs QBCAF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs MAXSF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TRKNF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TRKNY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TRKNY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs PCWLF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while PCWLF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -68.24. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TKAGY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs PHTCF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs GTMEY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AAFRF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs FRTAF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TCMFF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TCMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BZQIF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs UDIRF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while UDIRF trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -79.19. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TFAOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BZQIY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BZQIY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs IIJIF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs AXXTF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while AXXTF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs IIJIY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while IIJIY trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs MICCF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs PTITF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs CUCSF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while CUCSF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TACYY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs IQST Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while IQST trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs TLGHY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs PTTWF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs GMOYF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs SPKKY Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while SPKKY trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs CLCMF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.
CWIR vs BGAOF Comparison
CWIR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWIR stands at 19542.00. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CWIR is priced at $0.00, while BGAOF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, CWIR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWIR is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWIR.