Cloud Nine Web3 Technologies Inc.
Cloud Nine Web3 Technologies Inc. CLGUF Peers
See (CLGUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLGUF | $0.09 | N/A | 7.83M | -1.71 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $299.25 | -0.05% | 349.10B | 54.91 | $5.45 | +0.88% |
| CNSWF | $3,540.00 | -2.41% | 75.02B | 100.74 | $35.14 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $20.50 | -21.15% | 59.19B | 60.29 | $0.34 | +0.45% |
| DASTF | $39.65 | +1.54% | 52.08B | 39.65 | $1.00 | +0.68% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.12B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTY | $38.21 | +0.16% | 50.19B | 38.21 | $1.00 | +0.65% |
| WTCHF | $66.03 | +0.07% | 21.91B | 108.24 | $0.61 | +0.16% |
| WIGBY | $65.42 | +0.51% | 21.71B | 109.04 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
| DIDIY | $4.80 | +1.24% | 20.87B | 119.88 | $0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLGUF vs SAPGF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 349.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SAPGF trades at $299.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs CNSWF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 75.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while CNSWF trades at $3,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 100.74. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs NEMKY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 59.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NEMKY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs DASTF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 52.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while DASTF trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs INVUP Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and INVUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs DASTY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 50.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while DASTY trades at $38.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs WTCHF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 21.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while WTCHF trades at $66.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 108.24. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and WTCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs WIGBY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 21.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while WIGBY trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 109.04. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs DIDIY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 20.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while DIDIY trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 119.88. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs XROLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while XROLF trades at $111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 129.94. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SGGEF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SGGEF trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SGPYY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SGPYY trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs NEMTF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 72.26. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs OBIIF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs OCLCF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 11.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs NCSYF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NCSYF trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and NCSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs ALMFF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs KGDEY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while KGDEY trades at $177.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -321.87. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs THNOF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs HOILF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TMNSF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TMSNY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TMSNY trades at $73.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs FNOXF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs LIFX Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while LIFX trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 503.50. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SMCYY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs SICRF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs KXSCF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while KXSCF trades at $142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 405.71. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs ASOZY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs ASOZF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SRBEF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TMVWF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs UBMRF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TMVWY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TMVWY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs QTGPF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while QTGPF trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs KHOTF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs ESKEF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs IPEU Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs FREKF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while FREKF trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs WEMXF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TMOAY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TMOAY trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs MAGTF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs KNNNF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and KNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs SWONF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and SWONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs ZEUCF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs VOBIF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while VOBIF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs EGHSF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while EGHSF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs LTTHF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs GBGPF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 966.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs ESIGF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs BTRCF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 811.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while BTRCF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SLVFF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs BVSFF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and BVSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs TTMZF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 643.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TMOAF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs BCTCF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs NPACF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs PXPHF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs NPACY Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs RWWI Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 505.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while RWWI trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs CMDXF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 505.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while CMDXF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs NXLLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and NXLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs NSWEF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs TCYSF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 458.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TCYSF trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 220.93. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and TCYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs BRDLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs BLKLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 452.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while BLKLF trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -76.71. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and BLKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs IQGLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs CHNVF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs RPGHF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 375.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs PSSWF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs LCHTF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs PLDIF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while PLDIF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and PLDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs JAPPF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and JAPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs ELMFF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs RLLMF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 316.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while RLLMF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and RLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs BAINF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 307.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while BAINF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs DOTDF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs IVUFF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 295.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs CIGMF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs ABXXF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 270.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while ABXXF trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs LOQPF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while LOQPF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs EXMXF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs GBUX Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 260.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while GBUX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs DAHLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs FXSRF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs FBSFF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while FBSFF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs MCAP Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 194.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while MCAP trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SMTEF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 173.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SMTEF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs WONDF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 160.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while WONDF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs SYZLF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 159.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while SYZLF trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -341.50. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs IARGF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and IARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs EXSPF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs CBSZF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs TCIIF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and TCIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs DFORF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while DFORF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs WECMF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and WECMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs NEOJF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs THNCF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, THNCF has a market cap of 126.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while THNCF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas THNCF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to THNCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF is less volatile compared to THNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGUF.
CLGUF vs PSHPF Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and PSHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLGUF vs RTME Comparison
CLGUF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGUF stands at 7.83M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 125.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGUF is priced at $0.09, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGUF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CLGUF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGUF and RTME have similar daily volatility (0.00).