Clarity Gold Corp.
Clarity Gold Corp. CLGCF Peers
See (CLGCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLGCF | $0.02 | -20.85% | 1.03M | -0.93 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.21 | -2.54% | 63.03B | 11.64 | $0.19 | +1.91% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $21.01 | -9.17% | 18.80B | 15.22 | $1.38 | +2.60% |
| NESRF | $12.25 | +2.08% | 17.51B | 23.56 | $0.52 | +1.71% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.43% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLGCF vs ZIJMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 63.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ZIJMF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs OPYGY Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs GFIOF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 18.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while GFIOF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs NESRF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while NESRF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs NSTYY Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs HCHDY Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs NCMGY Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs NCMGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs KOZAY Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs CAHPF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while CAHPF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs HGMCF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while HGMCF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs LUGDF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while LUGDF trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ZHAOF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs AULGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs EDVMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while EDVMF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -65.24. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs DGMLF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs SBYSF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ARGTF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ARGTF trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -203.71. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ZIJMY Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ZIJMY trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs PMNXF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while PMNXF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs OCANF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while OCANF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs TORXF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while TORXF trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs CRNLF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs DPMLF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while DPMLF trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs GSISF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs CELTF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ELKMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ELKMF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs KNTNF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while KNTNF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs GRLGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RGRNF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs REDLF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RMLRF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RMLRF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs EOGSF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs HCHDF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while HCHDF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs WDOFF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while WDOFF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs CXBMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while CXBMF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs WFRSF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while WFRSF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ORAAF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ORAAF trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs DRDGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while DRDGF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs PAFRF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs OBNNF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs AURQF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MAUTF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 978.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MAUTF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs SVLKF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs BELGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 918.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while BELGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MWSNF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 886.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MWSNF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -72.80. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs SGSVF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs KRRGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs SNWGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 822.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while SNWGF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -36.57. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RUPRF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 800.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RUPRF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -171.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RMGGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 745.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RMGGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs WTGRF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RGDFF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs PDIYF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 613.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while PDIYF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -23.41. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs GUYGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 528.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while GUYGF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -73.22. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs NVMLF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ARNGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MNSAF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 434.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MNSAF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ECRTF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 412.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ECRTF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs KSKGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ORZCF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 387.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ORZCF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ASGOF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 378.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ASGOF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs LMGDF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 357.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while LMGDF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs TPRXF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MNDJF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 326.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MNDJF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RSRBF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 321.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RSRBF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs THXPF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 306.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while THXPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RIOFF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 304.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RIOFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -14.34. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs PROBF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 293.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while PROBF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs RMLFF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 292.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while RMLFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ALKEF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 284.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ALKEF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MGDPF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs FDMIF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 273.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while FDMIF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs OGNRF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 261.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while OGNRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 129.90. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs OSIIF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ERRSF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs TTTNF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs ELEMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 246.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while ELEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 100.48. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MAKOF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 246.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MAKOF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs STBMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 199.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while STBMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs WRLGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 195.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while WRLGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs SAAGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs CNLMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs HSTXF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 192.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while HSTXF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs DCCNF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs OMGGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 179.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while OMGGF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs JAGGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 176.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while JAGGF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs CNMXF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs SRBIF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 174.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while SRBIF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs GDRZF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 169.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while GDRZF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs THSGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 163.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while THSGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs KFFLF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs EEYMF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs STPGF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 152.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while STPGF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs AGXKF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs GGAZF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 151.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while GGAZF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs NVOOF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs DNGDF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 140.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while DNGDF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.
CLGCF vs MAIFF Comparison
CLGCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLGCF stands at 1.03M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 130.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CLGCF is priced at $0.02, while MAIFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLGCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, CLGCF's ROE is -32.69%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLGCF is more volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLGCF.