CyberKey Solutions, Inc.
CyberKey Solutions, Inc. CKYS Peers
See (CKYS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKYS | $0.00 | N/A | 2000.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FJTSF | $22.55 | +6.39% | 40.08B | 28.54 | $0.79 | +0.84% |
| NTDTY | $28.30 | +8.42% | 39.68B | 40.43 | $0.70 | N/A |
| FJTSY | $21.97 | -1.44% | 39.05B | 28.17 | $0.78 | N/A |
| NTTDF | $27.40 | N/A | 38.42B | 37.53 | $0.73 | +0.32% |
| NIPNF | $25.13 | +4.64% | 33.48B | 27.61 | $0.91 | +0.74% |
| CAPMF | $171.93 | -0.92% | 29.22B | 16.04 | $10.72 | +2.15% |
| CGEMY | $34.03 | -2.18% | 28.96B | 15.98 | $2.13 | +2.15% |
| NRILY | $41.10 | +0.76% | 23.51B | 36.70 | $1.12 | N/A |
| NURAF | $38.74 | +3.67% | 22.16B | 33.98 | $1.14 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
CKYS vs FJTSF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 40.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while FJTSF trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NTDTY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 39.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NTDTY trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs FJTSY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 39.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while FJTSY trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NTTDF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 38.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NTTDF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NIPNF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 33.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NIPNF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CAPMF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 29.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CAPMF trades at $171.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CGEMY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 28.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CGEMY trades at $34.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NRILY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 23.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NRILY trades at $41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NURAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NURAF trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs WIZEY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while WIZEY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs WPLCF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while WPLCF trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs TISNF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while TISNF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DTATF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ISMAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ISMAF trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs RPYTF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs BECTY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while BECTY trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs BHTLF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs TSYHF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while TSYHF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs TSYHY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while TSYHY trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SPSAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SPSAF trades at $206.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CTLPP Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ISMAY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ISMAY trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NWITY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NWKLF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NSSXF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs AEXAY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while AEXAY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SLNTY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NTCYF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CFTLF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NDTAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NCRRP Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ATEAY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ATEAY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs HLTEF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ATAZF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DLGEF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DUSXF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CCCMF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NGRRF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NGRRF trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CRAYF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DTSOF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 967.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SESPF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs KSUEF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs KAHTY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ADSGF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CTSDF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs TRCLF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs AEXAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 762.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while AEXAF trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs FDRVF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 732.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DCHIF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs FDDMF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs GBDMF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CMTUF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CEJOF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DTTLY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SLUNF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SVPLF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CSYJF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 261.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SSCC Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CSYJY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ITFRF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 229.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs TSSI Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 226.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while TSSI trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs EMCHF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs APMRF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs FCCN Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 189.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while FCCN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -56.05. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs APXYY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 169.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while APXYY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ALVNF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs APPEF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 149.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while APPEF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ULPRF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs ALYAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 131.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while ALYAF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs QUISF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CNGFF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs QSCGF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -19.90. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs GSDT Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 90.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while GSDT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DCHIY Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs KDCXF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs EAXR Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs HLEO Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while HLEO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CXGEF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SEBFF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SNELF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs BNXAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 24.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while BNXAF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs MLBEF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 23.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SPOFF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 15.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SPOFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs KTHGF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs XTMIF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 9.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs POSAF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 8.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while POSAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DRGV Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs KNRLF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DVRNF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs BRQSF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while BRQSF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs FUUN Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs DCSX Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CPIHF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs VSSSF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SKTCF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs NOSUF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while NOSUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs CRCW Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs SNOIF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.
CKYS vs MOBIF Comparison
CKYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKYS stands at 2000.00. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CKYS is priced at $0.00, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKYS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CKYS's ROE is N/A, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CKYS is more volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKYS.