Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CIS.BR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIS.BR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIS.BR | €53.06 | -4.36% | 228.2B | 17.28 | €3.07 | N/A |
| NOKIA.PA | €5.55 | +0.00% | 29.9B | 34.69 | €0.16 | +2.52% |
| TWEKA.AS | €37.28 | -0.37% | 1.5B | 15.73 | €2.37 | +4.02% |
| ETL.PA | €2.21 | +2.56% | 1.1B | -2.90 | -€0.76 | N/A |
| EVS.BR | €33.75 | -1.46% | 452.4M | 12.36 | €2.73 | +3.02% |
| PARRO.PA | €10.75 | +6.44% | 332.6M | -24.43 | -€0.44 | N/A |
| ALLEC.PA | €29.20 | +0.00% | 242.3M | 46.35 | €0.63 | +1.99% |
| ATEME.PA | €9.52 | -3.64% | 110.2M | -20.70 | -€0.46 | N/A |
| AKOM.PA | €2.80 | +0.00% | 55M | -2.46 | -€1.14 | N/A |
| EKI.PA | €1.95 | +0.21% | 52.6M | -5.72 | -€0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CIS.BR vs NOKIA.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, NOKIA.PA has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while NOKIA.PA trades at €5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas NOKIA.PA's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOKIA.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to NOKIA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check NOKIA.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs TWEKA.AS Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, TWEKA.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while TWEKA.AS trades at €37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas TWEKA.AS's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWEKA.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to TWEKA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check TWEKA.AS's competition here
CIS.BR vs ETL.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ETL.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ETL.PA trades at €2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ETL.PA's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETL.PA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ETL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ETL.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs EVS.BR Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, EVS.BR has a market cap of 452.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while EVS.BR trades at €33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas EVS.BR's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVS.BR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to EVS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check EVS.BR's competition here
CIS.BR vs PARRO.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, PARRO.PA has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while PARRO.PA trades at €10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas PARRO.PA's P/E ratio is -24.43. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARRO.PA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to PARRO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check PARRO.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALLEC.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALLEC.PA has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALLEC.PA trades at €29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALLEC.PA's P/E ratio is 46.35. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALLEC.PA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALLEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALLEC.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ATEME.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ATEME.PA has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ATEME.PA trades at €9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ATEME.PA's P/E ratio is -20.70. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATEME.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ATEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ATEME.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs AKOM.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, AKOM.PA has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while AKOM.PA trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas AKOM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKOM.PA's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR and AKOM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKOM.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs EKI.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, EKI.PA has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while EKI.PA trades at €1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas EKI.PA's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EKI.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to EKI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check EKI.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALBPK.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALBPK.PA has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALBPK.PA trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALBPK.PA's P/E ratio is -24.94. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALBPK.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALBPK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALBPK.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALNTG.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALNTG.PA has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALNTG.PA trades at €0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALNTG.PA's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALNTG.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALNTG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALNTG.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALHF.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALHF.PA has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALHF.PA trades at €4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALHF.PA's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALHF.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALHF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALHF.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs OPTI.BR Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, OPTI.BR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while OPTI.BR trades at €5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas OPTI.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPTI.BR's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to OPTI.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check OPTI.BR's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALTXC.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALTXC.PA has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALTXC.PA trades at €7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALTXC.PA's P/E ratio is -24.84. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALTXC.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALTXC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALTXC.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs AVT.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, AVT.PA has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while AVT.PA trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas AVT.PA's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVT.PA's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to AVT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check AVT.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALNN6.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALNN6.PA has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALNN6.PA trades at €0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALNN6.PA's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALNN6.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALNN6.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALNN6.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALARF.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALARF.PA has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALARF.PA trades at €0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALARF.PA's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALARF.PA's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR and ALARF.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALARF.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs PABSA.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, PABSA.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while PABSA.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas PABSA.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PABSA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR and PABSA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PABSA.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs ALAVY.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, ALAVY.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while ALAVY.PA trades at €1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas ALAVY.PA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALAVY.PA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to ALAVY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check ALAVY.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs VDLO.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, VDLO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while VDLO.PA trades at €2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas VDLO.PA's P/E ratio is -28.89. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VDLO.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to VDLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check VDLO.PA's competition here
CIS.BR vs HF.PA Comparison April 2026
CIS.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.BR stands at 228.2B. In comparison, HF.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.BR is priced at €53.06, while HF.PA trades at €7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.28, whereas HF.PA's P/E ratio is -48.97. In terms of profitability, CIS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.BR is less volatile compared to HF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.BR.Check HF.PA's competition here