Cineworld Group plc

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, 0XWG.L has a market cap of 268.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while 0XWG.L trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0XWG.L's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0XWG.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to 0XWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, DTVL.L has a market cap of 184.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while DTVL.L trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTVL.L's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DTVL.L's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and DTVL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, CCPA.L has a market cap of 171.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while CCPA.L trades at $180.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPA.L's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CCPA.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and CCPA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, CCP.L has a market cap of 136.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while CCP.L trades at $144.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCP.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CCP.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to CCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, CCPC.L has a market cap of 136.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while CCPC.L trades at $371.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPC.L's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CCPC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and CCPC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, TMO.L has a market cap of 110.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while TMO.L trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMO.L's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TMO.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and TMO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, 0QL0.L has a market cap of 84.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while 0QL0.L trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QL0.L's P/E ratio is -21.36. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QL0.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and 0QL0.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, 0M1G.L has a market cap of 74.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while 0M1G.L trades at $100.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0M1G.L's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0M1G.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CINE.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 0M1G.L has daily volatility of N/A.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, EMAN.L has a market cap of 36.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while EMAN.L trades at $40.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAN.L's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAN.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to EMAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, ZIN.L has a market cap of 15.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while ZIN.L trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIN.L's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIN.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to ZIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, IMMO.L has a market cap of 14.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while IMMO.L trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMMO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IMMO.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and IMMO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, HUD.L has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while HUD.L trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUD.L's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HUD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to HUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, OMIP.L has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while OMIP.L trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to OMIP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and OMIP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, BONH.L has a market cap of 5.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while BONH.L trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BONH.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BONH.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and BONH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, RHM.L has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while RHM.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHM.L's P/E ratio is 114.50. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RHM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CINE.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and RHM.L has daily volatility of N/A.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, AEO.L has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while AEO.L trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEO.L's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AEO.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and AEO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, LVCG.L has a market cap of 779772.00. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while LVCG.L trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVCG.L's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LVCG.L's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and LVCG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, GILD.L has a market cap of 643987.00. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while GILD.L trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILD.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GILD.L's ROE of +4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to GILD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, MIRA.L has a market cap of 267252.00. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while MIRA.L trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIRA.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIRA.L's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L and MIRA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CINE.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CINE.L stands at 686715.00. In comparison, DCD.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CINE.L is priced at $0.05, while DCD.L trades at $100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CINE.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCD.L's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CINE.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DCD.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CINE.L is less volatile compared to DCD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINE.L.