Caribbean Investment Holdings Limited
Caribbean Investment Holdings Limited CIHL.L Peers
See (CIHL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIHL.L | $26.50 | N/A | N/A | 0.03 | $8.60 | N/A |
| 0O84.L | $186.10 | -0.48% | 275.99B | N/A | N/A | +9.00% |
| 0KEF.L | $178.00 | -0.51% | 70.41B | 15.07 | $11.81 | +3.60% |
| SBID.L | $63.40 | N/A | 56.58B | 6.23 | $10.17 | +5.43% |
| LLOY.L | $78.02 | +2.87% | 46.83B | 13.00 | $0.06 | +0.04% |
| SANB.L | $146.50 | +0.69% | 45.49B | 0.33 | $4.40 | +0.06% |
| AXB.IL | $69.80 | -0.71% | 43.25B | 28.61 | $2.44 | +0.09% |
| 0JW2.L | $186.58 | -0.77% | 29.95B | 14.25 | $13.09 | +2.89% |
| AXB.L | $44.80 | N/A | 27.76B | 8.50 | $5.27 | N/A |
| AIBG.L | $556.00 | +1.83% | 11.88B | 7.13 | $0.78 | +4.68% |
Stock Comparison
CIHL.L vs 0O84.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0O84.L has a market cap of 275.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0O84.L trades at $186.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0O84.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0O84.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0O84.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0KEF.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KEF.L has a market cap of 70.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0KEF.L trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0KEF.L's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0KEF.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0KEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs SBID.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SBID.L has a market cap of 56.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while SBID.L trades at $63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas SBID.L's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SBID.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to SBID.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs LLOY.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LLOY.L has a market cap of 46.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while LLOY.L trades at $78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas LLOY.L's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LLOY.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to LLOY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs SANB.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SANB.L has a market cap of 45.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while SANB.L trades at $146.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas SANB.L's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SANB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to SANB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs AXB.IL Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AXB.IL has a market cap of 43.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while AXB.IL trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AXB.IL's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AXB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to AXB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0JW2.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JW2.L has a market cap of 29.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0JW2.L trades at $186.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0JW2.L's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0JW2.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0JW2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs AXB.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AXB.L has a market cap of 27.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while AXB.L trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AXB.L's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AXB.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to AXB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs AIBG.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AIBG.L has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while AIBG.L trades at $556.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AIBG.L's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AIBG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to AIBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs BIRG.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BIRG.L has a market cap of 11.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while BIRG.L trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BIRG.L's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BIRG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to BIRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs HSBK.IL Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HSBK.IL has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while HSBK.IL trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HSBK.IL's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HSBK.IL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to HSBK.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs FEDS.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FEDS.L has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while FEDS.L trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FEDS.L's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FEDS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to FEDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs TCS.IL Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TCS.IL has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while TCS.IL trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas TCS.IL's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TCS.IL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to TCS.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs CBKD.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CBKD.L has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while CBKD.L trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CBKD.L's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CBKD.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to CBKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs CBKD.IL Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CBKD.IL has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while CBKD.IL trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CBKD.IL's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CBKD.IL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to CBKD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs NLB.IL Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NLB.IL has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while NLB.IL trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NLB.IL's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NLB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to NLB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0EFW.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0EFW.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0EFW.L trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0EFW.L's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0EFW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0EFW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs BGEO.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BGEO.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while BGEO.L trades at $6,475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BGEO.L's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BGEO.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to BGEO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs VMUK.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, VMUK.L has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while VMUK.L trades at $217.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas VMUK.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VMUK.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to VMUK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs TBCG.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TBCG.L has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while TBCG.L trades at $4,470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas TBCG.L's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TBCG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to TBCG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs HSBK.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HSBK.L has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while HSBK.L trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HSBK.L's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HSBK.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to HSBK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0RE6.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RE6.L has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0RE6.L trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0RE6.L's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0RE6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0RE6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0RMP.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RMP.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0RMP.L trades at $242.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0RMP.L's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0RMP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0RMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs BOCH.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BOCH.L has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while BOCH.L trades at $375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BOCH.L's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BOCH.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to BOCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs NBS.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NBS.L has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while NBS.L trades at $131.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NBS.L's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NBS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to NBS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs XD5D.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, XD5D.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while XD5D.L trades at $85.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas XD5D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to XD5D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to XD5D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs IL0A.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IL0A.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while IL0A.L trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas IL0A.L's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IL0A.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to IL0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QLT.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QLT.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QLT.L trades at $1,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QLT.L's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QLT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QLT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs NLB.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NLB.L has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while NLB.L trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NLB.L's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NLB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to NLB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs PTSB.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PTSB.L has a market cap of 926.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while PTSB.L trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PTSB.L's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PTSB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to PTSB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs MTRO.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MTRO.L has a market cap of 813.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while MTRO.L trades at $120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas MTRO.L's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MTRO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to MTRO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QS4.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QS4.L has a market cap of 608.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QS4.L trades at $152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QS4.L's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QS4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QS4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QQ4.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QQ4.L has a market cap of 528.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QQ4.L trades at $938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QQ4.L's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QQ4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QQ4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QLU.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QLU.L has a market cap of 400.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QLU.L trades at $78.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QLU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QKG.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QKG.L has a market cap of 315.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QKG.L trades at $3,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QKG.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QKG.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QKG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QLK.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QLK.L has a market cap of 296.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QLK.L trades at $4,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QLK.L's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QLK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QLK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0QV3.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QV3.L has a market cap of 289.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0QV3.L trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0QV3.L's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0QV3.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0QV3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs 0ROV.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0ROV.L has a market cap of 166.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while 0ROV.L trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas 0ROV.L's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to 0ROV.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to 0ROV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs ARBB.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARBB.L has a market cap of 150.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while ARBB.L trades at $927.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ARBB.L's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ARBB.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to ARBB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs STB.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, STB.L has a market cap of 127.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while STB.L trades at $682.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas STB.L's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is less volatile compared to STB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.
CIHL.L vs MFX.L Comparison
CIHL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHL.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MFX.L has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CIHL.L is priced at $26.50, while MFX.L trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHL.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas MFX.L's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, CIHL.L's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MFX.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHL.L is more volatile compared to MFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHL.L.