Coeur d'Alene Bancorp, Inc.
Coeur d'Alene Bancorp, Inc. CDAB Peers
See (CDAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDAB | $18.00 | N/A | 34.04M | 23.38 | $0.77 | +1.11% |
| UNCRY | $32.55 | +1.24% | 202.78B | 9.63 | $3.38 | +2.35% |
| CAIXY | $2.88 | +2.64% | 183.90B | 9.29 | $0.31 | +4.25% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.24 | +0.03% | 154.03B | 8.01 | $3.90 | +4.35% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 126.06B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| BNPQF | $93.03 | +1.95% | 105.08B | 8.78 | $10.60 | +9.89% |
| UNCFF | $66.94 | +3.41% | 104.26B | 9.89 | $6.77 | +3.51% |
| BNPQY | $43.95 | +0.78% | 101.16B | 8.29 | $5.30 | +5.02% |
| IITSF | $5.56 | -3.64% | 98.85B | 9.93 | $0.56 | +6.65% |
Stock Comparison
CDAB vs UNCRY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 202.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while UNCRY trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CAIXY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 183.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CAIXY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BKAYY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CIHKY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 154.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CIHKY trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CIHHF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 126.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BNPQF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 105.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BNPQF trades at $93.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs UNCFF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 104.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while UNCFF trades at $66.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BNPQY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 101.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BNPQY trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs IITSF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 98.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while IITSF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and IITSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs DBSDF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 96.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while DBSDF trades at $33.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs DBSDY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 95.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while DBSDY trades at $134.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SBKFF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs KBCSY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 79.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while KBCSY trades at $49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs PBCRY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 71.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PBCRY trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs AKSJF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs PBCRF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 66.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PBCRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs EBKDY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 63.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while EBKDY trades at $40.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs PSBKF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 63.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs MZHOF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 61.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while MZHOF trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CIXPF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 61.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CIXPF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs LLDTF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and LLDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs CRARY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 60.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CRARY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs LLOBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 59.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CRARF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 58.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CRARF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and CRARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs OVCHF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while OVCHF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and OVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs OVCHY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while OVCHY trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CHCJY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 54.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CHCJY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CHBJF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs NRDBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while NRDBY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs NBNKF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 49.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while NBNKF trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs UOVEF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs STNDF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs BHKLY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 46.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BHKLY trades at $87.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs UOVEY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while UOVEY trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SCGLY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 43.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SCGLY trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BNKHF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BNKHF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs DNBBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while DNBBF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs DNBBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while DNBBY trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SCGLF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 39.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SCGLF trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs KBCSF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 38.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while KBCSF trades at $97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs BKRKY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 38.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKRKY trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SVKEF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BKRKF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 36.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKRKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CWESF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CRZBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CRZBY trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CRZBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CRZBF trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs JPSTF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and JPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs JPPTY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs DNKEY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 32.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while DNKEY trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs EBKOF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while EBKOF trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SWDBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 31.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SWDBF trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CEBCF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and CEBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs PPERY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 30.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PPERY trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SWDBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SWDBY trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs MLYBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while MLYBY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and MLYBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs JPHLF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs MLYNF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs DNSKF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs PSZKY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 27.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PSZKY trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs JPPHY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while JPPHY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BDORY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 26.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BDORY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs PPERF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 26.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PPERF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs PSZKF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PSZKF trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs HSNGY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while HSNGY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs GBOOF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while GBOOF trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs GBOOY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while GBOOY trades at $45.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs FCNCB Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while FCNCB trades at $1,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs HSNGF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs CMAKY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 24.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CMAKY trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BLMIF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BLMIF trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CGMBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CKHGY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CKHGY trades at $96.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BPXXY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SBGOF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 21.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SBGOF trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BKHYY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKHYY trades at $81.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SGBLY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 20.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SGBLY trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CKHGF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs MDIBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while MDIBY trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CMTDF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 18.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CMTDF trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SUTNY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SUTNY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs RSNHF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 18.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while RSNHF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs CRDIY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs PBLOF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and PBLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs BKHPF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs ISNPY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while ISNPY trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs GPFOF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs AIBGY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while AIBGY trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs AIBRF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while AIBRF trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BDOUF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs GPFOY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs VLYPN Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while VLYPN trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and VLYPN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs SKCBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs SUGBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BNCZF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs OTPBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDAB vs BKRIY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKRIY trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs MDIBF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs TKGBY Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while TKGBY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.
CDAB vs BKRIF Comparison
CDAB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDAB stands at 34.04M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CDAB is priced at $18.00, while BKRIF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDAB currently has a P/E ratio of 23.38, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, CDAB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDAB is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDAB.