Citizens Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
Citizens Commerce Bancshares, Inc. CCVS Peers
See (CCVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCVS | $15.50 | N/A | 61.82M | 3.97 | $3.90 | N/A |
| UNCRY | $31.35 | -0.24% | 199.37B | 9.25 | $3.39 | +2.46% |
| CAIXY | $2.74 | +0.37% | 175.53B | 8.84 | $0.31 | +4.48% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.23 | -0.97% | 154.58B | 7.93 | $3.94 | +4.35% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 129.53B | 6.61 | $0.77 | +5.44% |
| BNPQY | $44.63 | -0.80% | 100.82B | 8.47 | $5.27 | +5.58% |
| DBSDF | $35.33 | +2.08% | 100.06B | 12.14 | $2.91 | +2.96% |
| IITSF | $5.61 | +0.72% | 99.73B | 10.02 | $0.56 | +6.13% |
| DBSDY | $139.54 | +2.30% | 99.20B | 6.46 | $21.61 | +4.68% |
Stock Comparison
CCVS vs UNCRY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 199.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while UNCRY trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CAIXY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 175.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CAIXY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BKAYY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CIHKY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 154.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CIHKY trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CIHHF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 129.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BNPQY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 100.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BNPQY trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs DBSDF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 100.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while DBSDF trades at $35.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs IITSF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 99.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while IITSF trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs DBSDY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 99.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while DBSDY trades at $139.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs UNCFF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 98.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while UNCFF trades at $63.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BNPQF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 97.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BNPQF trades at $86.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SBKFF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 96.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs KBCSY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 75.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while KBCSY trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs PBCRY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 70.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PBCRY trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs PBCRF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 66.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PBCRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and PBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CHCJY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 66.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CHCJY trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CHCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs AKSJF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs MZHOF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 65.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while MZHOF trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs EBKDY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while EBKDY trades at $39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs LLDTF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs LLOBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 59.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and LLOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CRARF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 59.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CRARF trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CRARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CRARY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CRARY trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs PSBKF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 58.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PSBKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and PSBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs OVCHF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while OVCHF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and OVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs OVCHY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while OVCHY trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CIXPF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 56.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CIXPF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CHBJF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CHBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs NRDBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while NRDBY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs NBNKF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while NBNKF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and NBNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs UOVEF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs STNDF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs UOVEY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while UOVEY trades at $54.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BHKLY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 44.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BHKLY trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BNKHF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BNKHF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SCGLY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SCGLY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs DNBBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while DNBBF trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BKRKY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 39.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKRKY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SCGLF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SCGLF trades at $54.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs DNBBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 38.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while DNBBY trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BKRKF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 37.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKRKF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs KBCSF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 36.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while KBCSF trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SVKEF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and SVKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CWESF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 35.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CRZBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CRZBF trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CRZBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs JPSTF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and JPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CRZBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CRZBY trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs JPPTY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs DNKEY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while DNKEY trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CEBCF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CEBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs EBKOF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while EBKOF trades at $80.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and EBKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs PPERF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 30.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PPERF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and PPERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs BDORY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 30.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BDORY trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs JPPHY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 29.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while JPPHY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and JPPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs PPERY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 29.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PPERY trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs JPHLF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SWDBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SWDBY trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs MLYNF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SWDBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SWDBF trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and SWDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs MLYBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while MLYBY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs DNSKF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs PSZKY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 27.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PSZKY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs FCNCB Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 26.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while FCNCB trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs PSZKF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PSZKF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs HSNGY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while HSNGY trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs GBOOF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while GBOOF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CMAKY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 25.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CMAKY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CMAKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs GBOOY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while GBOOY trades at $44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs HSNGF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CKHGY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 23.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CKHGY trades at $100.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BLMIF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BLMIF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and BLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs CGMBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and CGMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs BPXXY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SGBLY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SGBLY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BKHYY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 20.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKHYY trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and BKHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs RSNHF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 20.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while RSNHF trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs MDIBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while MDIBY trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CKHGF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CMTDF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CMTDF trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SBGOF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 18.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SBGOF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SUTNY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 17.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SUTNY trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CRDIY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BNCZF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNCZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs PBLOF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and PBLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs BKHPF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs ISNPY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while ISNPY trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs GPFOF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs AIBGY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 15.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while AIBGY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BDOUF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs GPFOY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs AIBRF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while AIBRF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs VLYPN Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while VLYPN trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to VLYPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SKCBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs SUGBY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs OTPBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs MDIBF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs BKRIF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKRIF trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS and BKRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCVS vs BKRIY Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while BKRIY trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.
CCVS vs CIMDF Comparison
CCVS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVS stands at 61.82M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVS is priced at $15.50, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.97, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, CCVS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVS is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVS.