China CGame, Inc.
China CGame, Inc. CCGM Peers
See (CCGM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCGM | $0.01 | +9900.00% | 200400.00 | -0.08 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| FLRAP | $1,763.28 | +4.69% | 251.48B | -735.01 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| ACSAY | $13.09 | +0.51% | 83.36B | 18.18 | $0.72 | N/A |
| VCISF | $142.60 | +1.49% | 80.29B | 15.12 | $9.43 | +3.36% |
| VCISY | $35.52 | +0.54% | 79.99B | 15.05 | $2.36 | +3.24% |
| BOUYY | $8.48 | -0.95% | 79.94B | 13.46 | $0.63 | +2.83% |
| LTOUF | $37.00 | N/A | 50.88B | 78.72 | $0.47 | +0.91% |
| WSPOF | $194.67 | -0.10% | 25.41B | 49.79 | $3.91 | +0.55% |
| CRWOF | $0.44 | -16.71% | 17.85B | 3.16 | $0.14 | +47.94% |
| ACSAF | $63.85 | +12.33% | 16.27B | 17.84 | $3.58 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
CCGM vs FLRAP Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ACSAY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 83.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ACSAY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs VCISF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 80.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while VCISF trades at $142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to VCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs VCISY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 79.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while VCISY trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BOUYY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 79.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BOUYY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs LTOUF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, LTOUF has a market cap of 50.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while LTOUF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LTOUF's P/E ratio is 78.72. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to LTOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to LTOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs WSPOF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 25.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while WSPOF trades at $194.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CRWOF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 17.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CRWOF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ACSAF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ACSAF trades at $63.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ACSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs HOCFF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 13.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while HOCFF trades at $183.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to HOCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BOUYF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 13.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BOUYF trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs EFGSY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while EFGSY trades at $28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs EFGSF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to EFGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SNCAF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 11.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SNCAF trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 53.85. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs OBYCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 10.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while OBYCF trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs STBBF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while STBBF trades at $92.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to STBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs KAJMY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while KAJMY trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs KAJMF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while KAJMF trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs TISCY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while TISCY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SKBSY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SKBSY trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs AVHNF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to AVHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ACXIF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ACXIF trades at $150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SKSBF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SKSBF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SKSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs TISCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while TISCF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to TISCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CCOHF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CCOHF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs EKIVF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BCKIY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BCKIY trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BCKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BCKIF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BCKIF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs AVHNY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SHMUY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SHMUY trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 61.64. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ARCAY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ARCAY trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs RBWNY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to RBWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ARCVF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ARCVF trades at $46.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PUODY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PUODY trades at $218.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to PUODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SHMUF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ABGOF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs AGOAF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs NWSGY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while NWSGY trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs IMPJY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while IMPJY trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PYOIF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BAFBF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BAFBF trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BAFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs NWSZF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while NWSZF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BFLBY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BFLBY trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BFLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs OPMXF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while OPMXF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 98.53. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BFLBF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BFLBF trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SENGF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SENGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PYYIF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to PYYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BAFYY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SYRVF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PTJSY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs JGCCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs AFXXF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs JGCCY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while JGCCY trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -815.00. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to JGCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs GKTRF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PTJSF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SKBNF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs KLRGF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while KLRGF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PNOCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to PNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs AGRUF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to AGRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs TNISY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while TNISY trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs TNISF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while TNISF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to TNISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs HAZAF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs KBAGF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while KBAGF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to KBAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BIRDF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BIRDF trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BIRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BADFF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 984.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BADFF trades at $28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BADFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CKOCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CKOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs MOPHY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 933.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to MOPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ELLKY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs AEGXF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 854.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while AEGXF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ELWSF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 843.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ELWSF trades at $62.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -33.48. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs KIERF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 786.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while KIERF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs YITYY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while YITYY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to YITYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs RNWHF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to RNWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs TKFHY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 558.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ELLKF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SLAAF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 554.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SLAAF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CHYCY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CHYCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHYCF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CHYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs OBSJF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs YRCCF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs LYOPF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BRAGF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 279.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BRAGF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CSGQF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 258.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CSGQF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CSGQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs HUKEF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs DBMG Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while DBMG trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to DBMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BILBF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 68.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BILBF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs BRANF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 55.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while BRANF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to BRANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs KNNKF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to KNNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs APEUF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 36.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while APEUF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to APEUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs MLLUY Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while MLLUY trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs MURSF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while MURSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to MURSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs MRCR Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 16.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while MRCR trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to MRCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs LOUIF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to LOUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs COLDF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while COLDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs GRHI Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 6.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while GRHI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to GRHI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs ETWLF Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to ETWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs CIPI Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while CIPI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs SODE Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while SODE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM is more volatile compared to SODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGM.
CCGM vs PMDP Comparison
CCGM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGM stands at 200400.00. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGM is priced at $0.01, while PMDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGM's ROE is N/A, compared to PMDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGM and PMDP have similar daily volatility (196.04).