Cogeco Communications Inc.
Cogeco Communications Inc. CCA.TO Peers
See (CCA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCA.TO | $68.74 | +0.54% | 2.91B | 8.87 | $7.75 | +5.25% |
| VZ.NE | $19.16 | +0.79% | 261.27B | 10.25 | $1.87 | +8.57% |
| T.TO | $22.17 | +0.45% | 33.57B | 28.06 | $0.79 | +7.12% |
| BCE.TO | $30.15 | +0.13% | 27.79B | 71.79 | $0.42 | +13.24% |
| SJR-B.TO | $40.48 | +0.02% | 20.23B | 27.54 | $1.47 | N/A |
| RCI-B.TO | $36.01 | +0.84% | 19.85B | 11.11 | $3.24 | +5.57% |
| RCI-A.TO | $39.89 | -0.23% | 19.63B | 12.31 | $3.24 | +5.07% |
| BCE-PA.TO | $17.37 | +0.40% | 16.01B | 5.36 | $3.24 | +13.24% |
| BCE-PY.TO | $16.83 | +0.90% | 15.51B | 5.19 | $3.24 | +13.24% |
| QBR-B.TO | $37.78 | +0.35% | 8.69B | 11.45 | $3.30 | +3.50% |
Stock Comparison
CCA.TO vs VZ.NE Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, VZ.NE has a market cap of 261.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while VZ.NE trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas VZ.NE's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZ.NE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to VZ.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs T.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, T.TO has a market cap of 33.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while T.TO trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas T.TO's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to T.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs BCE.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, BCE.TO has a market cap of 27.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while BCE.TO trades at $30.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BCE.TO's P/E ratio is 71.79. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCE.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is less volatile compared to BCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs SJR-B.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, SJR-B.TO has a market cap of 20.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while SJR-B.TO trades at $40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas SJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJR-B.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to SJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs RCI-B.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, RCI-B.TO has a market cap of 19.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while RCI-B.TO trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas RCI-B.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCI-B.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to RCI-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs RCI-A.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, RCI-A.TO has a market cap of 19.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while RCI-A.TO trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas RCI-A.TO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCI-A.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to RCI-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs BCE-PA.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, BCE-PA.TO has a market cap of 16.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while BCE-PA.TO trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BCE-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCE-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to BCE-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs BCE-PY.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, BCE-PY.TO has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while BCE-PY.TO trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BCE-PY.TO's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCE-PY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to BCE-PY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs QBR-B.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, QBR-B.TO has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while QBR-B.TO trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas QBR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QBR-B.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is less volatile compared to QBR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs QBR-A.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, QBR-A.TO has a market cap of 8.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while QBR-A.TO trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas QBR-A.TO's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QBR-A.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to QBR-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs CGO.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, CGO.TO has a market cap of 624.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while CGO.TO trades at $64.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas CGO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to CGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs TGO.TO Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, TGO.TO has a market cap of 23.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while TGO.TO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas TGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGO.TO's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is less volatile compared to TGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs TO.CN Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, TO.CN has a market cap of 7.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while TO.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas TO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to TO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs RVR.CN Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, RVR.CN has a market cap of 5.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while RVR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas RVR.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to RVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.
CCA.TO vs ADMT.CN Comparison
CCA.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCA.TO stands at 2.91B. In comparison, ADMT.CN has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CCA.TO is priced at $68.74, while ADMT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas ADMT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CCA.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADMT.CN's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CCA.TO is more volatile compared to ADMT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCA.TO.