Burned Media, Ltd.
Burned Media, Ltd. BUNM Peers
See (BUNM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUNM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 275801.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BABAF | $15.78 | -4.72% | 302.23B | 18.35 | $0.86 | +1.32% |
| MPNGF | $17.14 | -3.92% | 104.69B | 22.25 | $0.77 | N/A |
| MPNGY | $34.18 | -3.96% | 103.47B | 22.19 | $1.54 | N/A |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | N/A | 52.08B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | N/A |
| JDCMF | $19.48 | +0.23% | 50.40B | 10.59 | $1.84 | +2.57% |
| ANCTF | $49.64 | +1.29% | 47.07B | 18.25 | $2.72 | +1.08% |
| YAHOY | $7.16 | +1.85% | 25.97B | 25.57 | $0.28 | N/A |
| RKUNF | $6.02 | -2.90% | 12.99B | -9.87 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| NCLTF | $109.47 | +1.49% | 12.37B | 20.81 | $5.26 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
BUNM vs BABAF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 302.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BABAF trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MPNGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 104.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MPNGF trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MPNGY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 103.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MPNGY trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs XXLLY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 52.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JDCMF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 50.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JDCMF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ANCTF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 47.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ANCTF trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs YAHOY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 25.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while YAHOY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs RKUNF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while RKUNF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs NCLTF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 12.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while NCLTF trades at $109.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs NCLTY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 11.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while NCLTY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs RKUNY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while RKUNY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MONOY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MONOY trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 54.76. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SRTTY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SRTTY trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SATLF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SATLF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SNROF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 9.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SNROF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HKTGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ZLNDY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ZLNDY trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DELHY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DELHY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DELHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MTTRY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MTTRY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MTTRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ZLDSF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 8.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ZLDSF trades at $31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DUFRY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DUFRY trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 66.31. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DLVHF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DLVHF trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs PETRY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DFRYF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DFRYF trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 61.83. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JBHIF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MONOF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MONOF trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs CDNAF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while CDNAF trades at $115.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ELPQF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 6.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ELPQF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ALEGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ALEGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JDSPY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JDSPY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JDDSF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JDDSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs CDNTF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while CDNTF trades at $149.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SAXJY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SAXJY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JTKWY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JTKWY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs TKAYF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while TKAYF trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SDIPF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SDIPF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ZLPSF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JUMSF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ZOPLY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DROOF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DROOF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs JUMSY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while JUMSY trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DNLMY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DNLMY trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HNORY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MRCIF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MRCIF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MCARY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MCARY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs FHNGY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while FHNGY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs YMDAF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while YMDAF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs GRUPF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs DSITF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while DSITF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs PAHGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while PAHGF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs BTOOY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs WHTPF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while WHTPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 200.67. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MIZUF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MIZUF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs GPGNF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while GPGNF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MTAGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MTAGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MTAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs LEFUF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while LEFUF trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MGLUY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MGLUY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MKRMF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs FNXTF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 987.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SCCAF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 874.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ACEHF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 684.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ACEHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HWGC Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs THGHY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HLFDY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 500.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HLFDY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs CRFCF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 486.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while CRFCF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs THGPF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 477.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while THGPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ASOMY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 477.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ASOMY trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HLFDF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 463.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs KGGNF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs BHOOY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 426.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BHOOY trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ASOMF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 420.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs BHHOF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs KTYCF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 279.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while KTYCF trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 145.83. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SSILF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 251.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SSILF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs NBRNF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HMAGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs HKTVY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 215.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while HKTVY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs YUMSF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 187.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while YUMSF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs RDBBY Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs BNNNF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs GMELF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 118.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs AHAHF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs WCRS Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 95.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while WCRS trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs IGDFF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 74.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while IGDFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs BJURF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 71.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BJURF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BJURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs MHCRF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to MHCRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs SPGZ Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BUNM has daily volatility of 196.04 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.
BUNM vs ADBGF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs PXHI Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 50.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while PXHI trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs IDGBF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to IDGBF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs ARTZF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs GLHD Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs CNVAF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 37.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs FDIT Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to FDIT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs RDBBF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while RDBBF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs TWRKF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 22.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs RLAB Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while RLAB trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs BWTL Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 14.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while BWTL trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.87. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.
BUNM vs AVDWF Comparison
BUNM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUNM stands at 275801.00. In comparison, AVDWF has a market cap of 9.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BUNM is priced at $0.00, while AVDWF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUNM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDWF's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, BUNM's ROE is N/A, compared to AVDWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BUNM is more volatile compared to AVDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUNM.