Bespoke Extracts, Inc.
Bespoke Extracts, Inc. BSPK Peers
See (BSPK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSPK | $0.10 | -11.02% | 1.14M | -1.02 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| MKGAF | $142.99 | +4.62% | 62.17B | 19.80 | $7.22 | +1.68% |
| MKKGY | $27.93 | +0.31% | 60.58B | 19.26 | $1.45 | +1.35% |
| HLNCF | $5.35 | -4.12% | 48.26B | 25.48 | $0.21 | +1.99% |
| TKPHF | $26.10 | -12.56% | 41.07B | 29.00 | $0.90 | +5.10% |
| IPSEY | $28.03 | -4.69% | 37.09B | 23.17 | $1.21 | +1.14% |
| SDZNY | $44.85 | -1.77% | 19.32B | -2242.50 | -$0.02 | +0.92% |
| TEVJF | $16.11 | N/A | 18.46B | -14.01 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.64B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| SGIOY | $8.49 | +2.41% | 14.44B | 12.48 | $0.68 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
BSPK vs MKGAF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 62.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while MKGAF trades at $142.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs MKKGY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 60.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while MKKGY trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HLNCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 48.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HLNCF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TKPHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 41.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TKPHF trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs IPSEY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 37.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while IPSEY trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SDZNY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SDZNY trades at $44.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2242.50. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TEVJF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 18.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TEVJF trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ESALY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SGIOY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SGIOY trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SGIOF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 12.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SGIOF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs BIOVF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while BIOVF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs IPSEF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while IPSEF trades at $125.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SFOSF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SFOSF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ESAIY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 7.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ESAIY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ESALF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 7.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ESALF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs GZPHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while GZPHF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HKMPF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HKMPF trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HKMPY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HKMPY trades at $53.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs APNHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while APNHF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs WIBFF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LVZPF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HLBBF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HLBBF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HLUBF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HLUBF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs APNHY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while APNHY trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs INVVY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs IZQVF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HMDCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs DNPUF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while DNPUF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ULIHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ULIHF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HYPMY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HYPMY trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HTSUF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HTSUF trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs THCBF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CHSYF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CHSYF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TSMRF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TSMRF trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs DMPHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LJUIF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LBTSF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LBTSF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 150.17. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs NPNKF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while NPNKF trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SHEZF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CHIZF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CHIZF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SMDPY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SMDPY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs AUSAF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, AUSAF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while AUSAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas AUSAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to AUSAF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to AUSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs KARBF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs NPPNY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while NPPNY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs EVOTF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while EVOTF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs YIHCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ARSUF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ARSUF trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs GTBIF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while GTBIF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SWGHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs BIOGY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while BIOGY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs GNMLF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while GNMLF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs NIKA Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while NIKA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs KKPCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while KKPCF trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs KSPHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 994.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while KSPHF trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CASBF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 982.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CASBF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LVTTF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 881.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs EVRRF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 877.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to EVRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs NRXCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 832.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to NRXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TCNNF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 830.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TCNNF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TWAPF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CSWYF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 815.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CSWYF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TRXPF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SWDCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 679.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SWDCF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CURLF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 620.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CURLF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs TRSSF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SGFEF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 544.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SGFEF trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CCHWF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs AIHLF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 507.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while AIHLF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs BOIRF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 494.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while BOIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ELTP Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 464.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ELTP trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs PEXXF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs SHPHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 455.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while SHPHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs MITPF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 451.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while MITPF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs KHTRF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 443.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while KHTRF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 148.67. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs AGYTF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs GLASF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 313.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while GLASF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs PKBFF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 288.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs BHCCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 271.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs VRNOF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 248.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while VRNOF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CPHRF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 244.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CPHRF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CRLBF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 236.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CRLBF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs PLNHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HUMDF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 147.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HUMDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs COPHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs PHCUF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 117.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while PHCUF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is -432.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LPCUF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CNVCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs HLTRF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 102.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while HLTRF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs GRUSF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 101.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while GRUSF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs ABSCF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 92.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while ABSCF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs BIOYF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 89.70M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while BIOYF trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LOVFF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 86.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LOVFF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs PLNH Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 83.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while PLNH trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs GBLP Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, GBLP has a market cap of 83.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while GBLP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas GBLP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to GBLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to GBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs CBWTF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 83.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while CBWTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs LRDSF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 82.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs AAWH Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 75.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while AAWH trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs EOFBY Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to EOFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.
BSPK vs JUSHF Comparison
BSPK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSPK stands at 1.14M. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BSPK is priced at $0.10, while JUSHF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSPK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.02, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, BSPK's ROE is +13.75%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BSPK is more volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSPK.