Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. BPY-UN.TO Peers
See (BPY-UN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPY-UN.TO | $23.29 | -0.64% | N/A | -7.94 | -$2.94 | N/A |
| FSV.TO | $245.12 | -0.03% | 11.14B | 60.52 | $4.05 | +0.58% |
| CIGI.TO | $174.88 | -1.75% | 8.62B | 43.50 | $4.02 | +0.24% |
| BPO-PI.TO | $16.63 | +0.18% | 8.06B | 3.85 | $4.32 | +9.58% |
| TCN.TO | $15.34 | -0.78% | 4.18B | 27.39 | $0.56 | N/A |
| AIF.TO | $56.05 | -0.12% | 2.58B | 509.55 | $0.11 | +1.07% |
| MEQ.TO | $193.72 | +0.59% | 1.81B | 7.35 | $26.35 | +0.07% |
| SVI.TO | $3.90 | +1.04% | 1.43B | -43.33 | -$0.09 | +0.30% |
| REAX.TO | $2.42 | -5.10% | 435.92M | -14.24 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| MPC.TO | $5.08 | +1.60% | 268.48M | -6.86 | -$0.74 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
BPY-UN.TO vs FSV.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FSV.TO has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while FSV.TO trades at $245.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas FSV.TO's P/E ratio is 60.52. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FSV.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to FSV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs CIGI.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CIGI.TO has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while CIGI.TO trades at $174.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas CIGI.TO's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CIGI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CIGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs BPO-PI.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BPO-PI.TO has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while BPO-PI.TO trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas BPO-PI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BPO-PI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BPO-PI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs TCN.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TCN.TO has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while TCN.TO trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas TCN.TO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TCN.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs AIF.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AIF.TO has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while AIF.TO trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas AIF.TO's P/E ratio is 509.55. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to AIF.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to AIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs MEQ.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MEQ.TO has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while MEQ.TO trades at $193.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas MEQ.TO's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MEQ.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MEQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs SVI.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SVI.TO has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while SVI.TO trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas SVI.TO's P/E ratio is -43.33. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SVI.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to SVI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs REAX.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, REAX.TO has a market cap of 435.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while REAX.TO trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas REAX.TO's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to REAX.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is less volatile compared to REAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs MPC.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MPC.TO has a market cap of 268.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while MPC.TO trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas MPC.TO's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MPC.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to MPC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs BRE.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BRE.TO has a market cap of 134.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while BRE.TO trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas BRE.TO's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BRE.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BRE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs IVQ.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, IVQ.TO has a market cap of 123.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while IVQ.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas IVQ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IVQ.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is less volatile compared to IVQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs BEK-B.TO Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, BEK-B.TO has a market cap of 22.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while BEK-B.TO trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas BEK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BEK-B.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to BEK-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs EMER.CN Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, EMER.CN has a market cap of 8.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while EMER.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas EMER.CN's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EMER.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to EMER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.
BPY-UN.TO vs TEMP.CN Comparison
BPY-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPY-UN.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TEMP.CN has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BPY-UN.TO is priced at $23.29, while TEMP.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPY-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.94, whereas TEMP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BPY-UN.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TEMP.CN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPY-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TEMP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPY-UN.TO.