Peekaboo Beans Inc.

BEAN.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEAN.CN stands at 1.01M. In comparison, GIL.TO has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BEAN.CN is priced at $0.02, while GIL.TO trades at $68.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEAN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GIL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, BEAN.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIL.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BEAN.CN is less volatile compared to GIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEAN.CN.

BEAN.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEAN.CN stands at 1.01M. In comparison, GOOS.TO has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BEAN.CN is priced at $0.02, while GOOS.TO trades at $12.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEAN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GOOS.TO's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, BEAN.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOOS.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEAN.CN is less volatile compared to GOOS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEAN.CN.

BEAN.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEAN.CN stands at 1.01M. In comparison, IFA.TO has a market cap of 33.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BEAN.CN is priced at $0.02, while IFA.TO trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEAN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IFA.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BEAN.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFA.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEAN.CN is less volatile compared to IFA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEAN.CN.

BEAN.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEAN.CN stands at 1.01M. In comparison, UNI.TO has a market cap of 23.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BEAN.CN is priced at $0.02, while UNI.TO trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEAN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UNI.TO's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, BEAN.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNI.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BEAN.CN and UNI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).