Brookstone Intermediate Bond ET

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BND has a market cap of 354.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BND trades at $72.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBMPX has a market cap of 352.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBMPX trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBMPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBTIX has a market cap of 352.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBTIX trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBTIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBMFX has a market cap of 352.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBMFX trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBMFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBTLX has a market cap of 352.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBTLX trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBTLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VTBNX has a market cap of 307.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VTBNX trades at $9.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VTBNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTBNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VTBNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BNDX has a market cap of 103.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BNDX trades at $49.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VTABX has a market cap of 102.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VTABX trades at $19.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VTABX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTABX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VTABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VTIFX has a market cap of 102.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VTIFX trades at $29.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VTIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VTIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BFAFX has a market cap of 93.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BFAFX trades at $11.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BFAFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBIRX has a market cap of 64.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBIRX trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FXNAX has a market cap of 62.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FXNAX trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FXNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FXNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VCIT has a market cap of 54.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VCIT trades at $81.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VCIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VCIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VICSX has a market cap of 54.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VICSX trades at $21.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VICSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VICSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VICSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BAGSX has a market cap of 52.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BAGSX trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BAGSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BAGIX has a market cap of 52.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BAGIX trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, WOBDX has a market cap of 49.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while WOBDX trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas WOBDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOBDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to WOBDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, JCBZX has a market cap of 49.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while JCBZX trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JCBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCBZX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to JCBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, TLT has a market cap of 47.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while TLT trades at $86.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas TLT's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is less volatile compared to TLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BIV has a market cap of 45.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BIV trades at $75.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, SGOV has a market cap of 44.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while SGOV trades at $100.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SGOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGOV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to SGOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBILX has a market cap of 44.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBILX trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBILX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBILX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBILX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VCSH has a market cap of 41.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VCSH trades at $78.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VCSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VCSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VSCSX has a market cap of 41.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VSCSX trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VSCSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VSCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FTBFX has a market cap of 39.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FTBFX trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FTBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FTBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BCOIX has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BCOIX trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BCOIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCOIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BCOIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VTEAX has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VTEAX trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VTEAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTEAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VTEAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BCOSX has a market cap of 38.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BCOSX trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BCOSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCOSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BCOSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IEF has a market cap of 34.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IEF trades at $93.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IEF's P/E ratio is -22.02. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, MWTIX has a market cap of 34.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while MWTIX trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MWTIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to MWTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, MWTRX has a market cap of 34.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while MWTRX trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MWTRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to MWTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, MWTSX has a market cap of 33.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while MWTSX trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MWTSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to MWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IUSB has a market cap of 33.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IUSB trades at $45.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IUSB's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IUSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, LQD has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while LQD trades at $107.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LQD's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to LQD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, DBLTX has a market cap of 29.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while DBLTX trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas DBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to DBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, DLTNX has a market cap of 29.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while DLTNX trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas DLTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to DLTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, GIBAX has a market cap of 27.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while GIBAX trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas GIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to GIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, GIBRX has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while GIBRX trades at $23.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas GIBRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to GIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, GIBLX has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while GIBLX trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas GIBLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to GIBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, GIBCX has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while GIBCX trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas GIBCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to GIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, GIBIX has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while GIBIX trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas GIBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to GIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, PTRQX has a market cap of 27.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while PTRQX trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PTRQX's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTRQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to PTRQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, PDBZX has a market cap of 27.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while PDBZX trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PDBZX's P/E ratio is 59.94. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to PDBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, JHBIX has a market cap of 26.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while JHBIX trades at $13.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JHBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to JHBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, JBFRX has a market cap of 26.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while JBFRX trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JBFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBFRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to JBFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, JHNBX has a market cap of 26.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while JHNBX trades at $13.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JHNBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHNBX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to JHNBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IBFFX has a market cap of 25.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IBFFX trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, AFTFX has a market cap of 23.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while AFTFX trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas AFTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to AFTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, NHMCX has a market cap of 22.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while NHMCX trades at $18.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NHMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to NHMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, USHY has a market cap of 21.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while USHY trades at $36.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas USHY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to USHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, LBNVX has a market cap of 21.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while LBNVX trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LBNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to LBNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IGSB has a market cap of 21.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IGSB trades at $52.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IGSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IGSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, ANBEX has a market cap of 19.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while ANBEX trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas ANBEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANBEX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to ANBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, SHV has a market cap of 19.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while SHV trades at $110.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to SHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FBND has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FBND trades at $45.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FBND's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FBND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, HYG has a market cap of 15.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while HYG trades at $79.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas HYG's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to HYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, PFBPX has a market cap of 14.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while PFBPX trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PFBPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFBPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to PFBPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, PFOAX has a market cap of 14.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while PFOAX trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PFOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFOAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to PFOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, PFORX has a market cap of 14.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while PFORX trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PFORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to PFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FTRBX has a market cap of 14.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FTRBX trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FTRBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTRBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FTRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VUBFX has a market cap of 13.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VUBFX trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VUBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUBFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VUBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VCORX has a market cap of 13.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VCORX trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VCORX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCORX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VCORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, NHCCX has a market cap of 13.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while NHCCX trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NHCCX's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to NHCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, NHMRX has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while NHMRX trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NHMRX's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to NHMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VCOBX has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VCOBX trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VCOBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCOBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VCOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, NHMAX has a market cap of 13.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while NHMAX trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NHMAX's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to NHMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, NHMFX has a market cap of 13.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while NHMFX trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NHMFX's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to NHMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BFIFX has a market cap of 13.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BFIFX trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BFIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFIFX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VCLT has a market cap of 13.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VCLT trades at $73.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VCLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCLT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is less volatile compared to VCLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VLTCX has a market cap of 13.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VLTCX trades at $19.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VLTCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLTCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VLTCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, USIG has a market cap of 13.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while USIG trades at $50.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas USIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to USIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, LUBAX has a market cap of 12.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while LUBAX trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LUBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUBAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to LUBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBLTX has a market cap of 12.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBLTX trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBLTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BIMSX has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BIMSX trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BIMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BIMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BSBIX has a market cap of 11.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BSBIX trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BSBIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BSBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BSBSX has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BSBSX trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FIKQX has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FIKQX trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FIKQX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIKQX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FIKQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FBNDX has a market cap of 10.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FBNDX trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FBNDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBNDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FBNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, TLH has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while TLH trades at $99.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas TLH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is less volatile compared to TLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, WBFFX has a market cap of 10.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while WBFFX trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas WBFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to WBFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, RCWAX has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while RCWAX trades at $15.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas RCWAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCWAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to RCWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FIPDX has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FIPDX trades at $9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FIPDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIPDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FIPDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, WIPIX has a market cap of 9.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while WIPIX trades at $11.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas WIPIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIPIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to WIPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, STYAX has a market cap of 9.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while STYAX trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas STYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to STYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IICIX has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IICIX trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IICIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IICIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IICIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IIBZX has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IIBZX trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IIBZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IIBZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IIBZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, IIBAX has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while IIBAX trades at $8.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IIBAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to IIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, SUB has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while SUB trades at $105.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to SUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, PTIAX has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while PTIAX trades at $19.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PTIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to PTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, SPIB has a market cap of 9.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while SPIB trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SPIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to SPIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BLV has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BLV trades at $67.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is less volatile compared to BLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, VBLAX has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while VBLAX trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas VBLAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to VBLAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, BUBSX has a market cap of 8.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while BUBSX trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BUBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to BUBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FLOT has a market cap of 8.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FLOT trades at $50.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FLOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FLOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, TRBFX has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while TRBFX trades at $4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas TRBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to TRBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, SPAB has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while SPAB trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SPAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to SPAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, SCHZ has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while SCHZ trades at $22.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SCHZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to SCHZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, FUTBX has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while FUTBX trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FUTBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUTBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to FUTBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.

BAMO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAMO stands at 37.76M. In comparison, JNK has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMO is priced at $30.69, while JNK trades at $95.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAMO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JNK's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, BAMO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMO is more volatile compared to JNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMO.