Aberdeen New Thai Investment Trust Plc

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QYU.L has a market cap of 203.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QYU.L trades at $127.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QYU.L's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QYU.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KYY.L has a market cap of 158.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0KYY.L trades at $516.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0KYY.L's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KYY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0KYY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L3I.L has a market cap of 154.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0L3I.L trades at $85.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0L3I.L's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0L3I.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0L3I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QZZ.L has a market cap of 148.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QZZ.L trades at $957.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QZZ.L's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QZZ.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QZZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R3C.L has a market cap of 127.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0R3C.L trades at $148.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0R3C.L's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R3C.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0R3C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0Z1W.L has a market cap of 105.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0Z1W.L trades at $125.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0Z1W.L's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0Z1W.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0Z1W.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JC3.L has a market cap of 99.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0JC3.L trades at $173.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0JC3.L's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JC3.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0JC3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HR2.L has a market cap of 96.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HR2.L trades at $268.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HR2.L's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HR2.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0HR2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K36.L has a market cap of 87.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0K36.L trades at $484.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0K36.L's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K36.L's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0K36.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HT4.L has a market cap of 76.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HT4.L trades at $200.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HT4.L's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HT4.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0HT4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HLQ.L has a market cap of 62.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HLQ.L trades at $87.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HLQ.L's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HLQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0HLQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IBC.L has a market cap of 51.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0IBC.L trades at $205.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0IBC.L's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IBC.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0IBC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K4T.L has a market cap of 46.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0K4T.L trades at $80.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0K4T.L's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K4T.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0K4T.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KU1.L has a market cap of 30.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0KU1.L trades at $151.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0KU1.L's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KU1.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0KU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QOQ.L has a market cap of 30.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QOQ.L trades at $1,173.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QOQ.L's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QOQ.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QOQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L9G.L has a market cap of 27.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0L9G.L trades at $96.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0L9G.L's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0L9G.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0L9G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HQN.L has a market cap of 23.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HQN.L trades at $220.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HQN.L's P/E ratio is 47.13. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HQN.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0HQN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LC3.L has a market cap of 22.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0LC3.L trades at $60.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0LC3.L's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LC3.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0LC3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RH1.L has a market cap of 22.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RH1.L trades at $81.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RH1.L's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RH1.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RH1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KNY.L has a market cap of 20.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0KNY.L trades at $96.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0KNY.L's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KNY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0KNY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K91.L has a market cap of 20.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0K91.L trades at $104.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0K91.L's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K91.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0K91.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HHP.L has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HHP.L trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HHP.L's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HHP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0HHP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RT6.L has a market cap of 11.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RT6.L trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RT6.L's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RT6.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RT6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QI9.L has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QI9.L trades at $80.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QI9.L's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QI9.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QI9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HD0.L has a market cap of 10.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HD0.L trades at $36.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HD0.L's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HD0.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0HD0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0SAY.L has a market cap of 10.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0SAY.L trades at $51.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0SAY.L's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0SAY.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0SAY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UAN.L has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0UAN.L trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0UAN.L's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0UAN.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0UAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QLD.L has a market cap of 6.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QLD.L trades at $447.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QLD.L's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QLD.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RPW.L has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RPW.L trades at $38.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RPW.L's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RPW.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RPW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RGB.L has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RGB.L trades at $117.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RGB.L's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RGB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HA8.L has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HA8.L trades at $84.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HA8.L's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HA8.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0HA8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JXQ.L has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0JXQ.L trades at $53.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0JXQ.L's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JXQ.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0JXQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QJX.L has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QJX.L trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QJX.L's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QJX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QJX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IZM.L has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0IZM.L trades at $6.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0IZM.L's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IZM.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0IZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J2Z.L has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0J2Z.L trades at $27.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0J2Z.L's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0J2Z.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0J2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RP0.L has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RP0.L trades at $19.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RP0.L's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RP0.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RP0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J4M.L has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0J4M.L trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0J4M.L's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0J4M.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0J4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QPJ.L has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QPJ.L trades at $99.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QPJ.L's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QPJ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QPJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RL4.L has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RL4.L trades at $32.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RL4.L's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RL4.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RL4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R25.L has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0R25.L trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0R25.L's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R25.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0R25.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0O2B.L has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0O2B.L trades at $43.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0O2B.L's P/E ratio is 104.52. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0O2B.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0O2B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HHU.L has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HHU.L trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HHU.L's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HHU.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0HHU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K5R.L has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0K5R.L trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0K5R.L's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K5R.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0K5R.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0A26.L has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0A26.L trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0A26.L's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0A26.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0A26.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QOC.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QOC.L trades at $167.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QOC.L's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QOC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0QOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0N5Z.L has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0N5Z.L trades at $28.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0N5Z.L's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0N5Z.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0N5Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NDP.L has a market cap of 946.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0NDP.L trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0NDP.L's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0NDP.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0NDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KH0.L has a market cap of 901.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0KH0.L trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0KH0.L's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KH0.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0KH0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J0N.L has a market cap of 598.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0J0N.L trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0J0N.L's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0J0N.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0J0N.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PEYS.L has a market cap of 542.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while PEYS.L trades at $784.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas PEYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEYS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to PEYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JTZ.L has a market cap of 541.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0JTZ.L trades at $40.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0JTZ.L's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JTZ.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0JTZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JD3.L has a market cap of 501.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0JD3.L trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0JD3.L's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JD3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0JD3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0DK7.L has a market cap of 482.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0DK7.L trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0DK7.L's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0DK7.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0DK7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RG7.L has a market cap of 464.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RG7.L trades at $82.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RG7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RG7.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0RG7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R7T.L has a market cap of 405.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0R7T.L trades at $11.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0R7T.L's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R7T.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0R7T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0OPJ.L has a market cap of 352.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0OPJ.L trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0OPJ.L's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0OPJ.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0OPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0E1L.L has a market cap of 327.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0E1L.L trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0E1L.L's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0E1L.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0E1L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K7X.L has a market cap of 300.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0K7X.L trades at $11.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0K7X.L's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0K7X.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0K7X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QNE.L has a market cap of 296.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QNE.L trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QNE.L's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QNE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HO6.L has a market cap of 248.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HO6.L trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HO6.L's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HO6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0HO6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RWM.L has a market cap of 207.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0RWM.L trades at $41.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0RWM.L's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RWM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0RWM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, OIT.L has a market cap of 190.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while OIT.L trades at $141.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas OIT.L's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OIT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to OIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JARA.L has a market cap of 136.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while JARA.L trades at $79.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas JARA.L's P/E ratio is -39.80. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JARA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to JARA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QLZ.L has a market cap of 124.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0QLZ.L trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0QLZ.L's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QLZ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to 0QLZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R4W.L has a market cap of 108.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0R4W.L trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0R4W.L's P/E ratio is -454.55. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R4W.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0R4W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AJG.L has a market cap of 71.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while AJG.L trades at $172.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas AJG.L's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AJG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ANW.L has daily volatility of 1.01 and AJG.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0XWD.L has a market cap of 56.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0XWD.L trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0XWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0XWD.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0XWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GCVG.L has a market cap of 29.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while GCVG.L trades at $33.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas GCVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GCVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to GCVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LHX.L has a market cap of 28.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0LHX.L trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0LHX.L's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0LHX.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0LHX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HKM.L has a market cap of 17.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while 0HKM.L trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas 0HKM.L's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HKM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to 0HKM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JPXU.L has a market cap of 15.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while JPXU.L trades at $220.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas JPXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JPXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to JPXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SSIF.L has a market cap of 6.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while SSIF.L trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas SSIF.L's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSIF.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is less volatile compared to SSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.

ANW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANW.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FTFX.L has a market cap of 5.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ANW.L is priced at $398.00, while FTFX.L trades at $24.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.21, whereas FTFX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANW.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTFX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANW.L is more volatile compared to FTFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANW.L.