ENENSYS Technologies SA
ENENSYS Technologies SA ALNN6.PA Peers
See (ALNN6.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALNN6.PA | $1.06 | +0.95% | 8.22M | 2.79 | $0.38 | +1.23% |
| CIS.BR | $53.06 | -4.36% | 228.21B | 17.28 | $3.07 | N/A |
| NOKIA.PA | $4.69 | -1.18% | 24.55B | 21.34 | $0.22 | +2.77% |
| ETL.PA | $3.48 | +7.24% | 1.65B | -1.70 | -$2.05 | N/A |
| TWEKA.AS | $36.44 | -1.03% | 1.45B | 14.58 | $2.50 | +4.12% |
| EVS.BR | $35.50 | -3.14% | 478.80M | 11.75 | $3.02 | +3.10% |
| PARRO.PA | $6.90 | -1.15% | 211.85M | -10.62 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| ALLEC.PA | $25.50 | +5.81% | 211.51M | 37.50 | $0.68 | +1.02% |
| EKI.PA | $3.96 | +3.13% | 106.71M | -15.23 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| AKOM.PA | $2.80 | N/A | 51.39M | -2.00 | -$1.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ALNN6.PA vs CIS.BR Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, CIS.BR has a market cap of 228.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while CIS.BR trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas CIS.BR's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CIS.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to CIS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs NOKIA.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, NOKIA.PA has a market cap of 24.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while NOKIA.PA trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas NOKIA.PA's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NOKIA.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to NOKIA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ETL.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ETL.PA has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ETL.PA trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ETL.PA's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ETL.PA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is less volatile compared to ETL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs TWEKA.AS Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, TWEKA.AS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while TWEKA.AS trades at $36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas TWEKA.AS's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to TWEKA.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to TWEKA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs EVS.BR Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, EVS.BR has a market cap of 478.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while EVS.BR trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas EVS.BR's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to EVS.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to EVS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs PARRO.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, PARRO.PA has a market cap of 211.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while PARRO.PA trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas PARRO.PA's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PARRO.PA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to PARRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALLEC.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALLEC.PA has a market cap of 211.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALLEC.PA trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALLEC.PA's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALLEC.PA's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ALLEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs EKI.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, EKI.PA has a market cap of 106.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while EKI.PA trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas EKI.PA's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to EKI.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to EKI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs AKOM.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, AKOM.PA has a market cap of 51.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while AKOM.PA trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas AKOM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AKOM.PA's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to AKOM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ATEME.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ATEME.PA has a market cap of 45.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ATEME.PA trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ATEME.PA's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ATEME.PA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ATEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALNTG.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALNTG.PA has a market cap of 32.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALNTG.PA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALNTG.PA's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALNTG.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ALNTG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALHF.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALHF.PA has a market cap of 16.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALHF.PA trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALHF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALHF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ALHF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALBPK.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALBPK.PA has a market cap of 15.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALBPK.PA trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALBPK.PA's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALBPK.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ALBPK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs OPTI.BR Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, OPTI.BR has a market cap of 13.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while OPTI.BR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas OPTI.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to OPTI.BR's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is less volatile compared to OPTI.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALTXC.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALTXC.PA has a market cap of 11.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALTXC.PA trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALTXC.PA's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALTXC.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ALTXC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALARF.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALARF.PA has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALARF.PA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALARF.PA's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALARF.PA's ROE of -3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is less volatile compared to ALARF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs AVT.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, AVT.PA has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while AVT.PA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas AVT.PA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AVT.PA's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is less volatile compared to AVT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs HF.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, HF.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while HF.PA trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas HF.PA's P/E ratio is -48.97. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HF.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to HF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs ALAVY.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, ALAVY.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while ALAVY.PA trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas ALAVY.PA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALAVY.PA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to ALAVY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.
ALNN6.PA vs VDLO.PA Comparison
ALNN6.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALNN6.PA stands at 8.22M. In comparison, VDLO.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, ALNN6.PA is priced at $1.06, while VDLO.PA trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALNN6.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.79, whereas VDLO.PA's P/E ratio is -28.89. In terms of profitability, ALNN6.PA's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VDLO.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALNN6.PA is more volatile compared to VDLO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALNN6.PA.