LleidaNetworks Serveis Telemàtics, S.A.
LleidaNetworks Serveis Telemàtics, S.A. ALLLN.PA Peers
See (ALLLN.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLLN.PA | $1.26 | +1.61% | 19.56M | 21.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| VERIZ.BR | $54.00 | N/A | 227.02B | 12.19 | $4.43 | N/A |
| DTEL.BR | $20.00 | +0.37% | 99.45B | 18.02 | $1.11 | N/A |
| ORA.PA | $12.36 | +0.41% | 32.86B | 17.17 | $0.72 | +5.83% |
| TFA.BR | $3.90 | +0.59% | 22.43B | 15.00 | $0.26 | N/A |
| KPN.AS | $3.91 | +0.28% | 15.18B | 19.52 | $0.20 | +4.35% |
| IAM.PA | $9.80 | -1.53% | 8.62B | 51.58 | $0.19 | +0.38% |
| TIT.BR | $0.31 | +0.49% | 6.32B | -0.58 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| TNET.BR | $21.28 | +0.38% | 2.31B | 11.89 | $1.79 | N/A |
| PROX.BR | $6.85 | -1.23% | 2.21B | 4.53 | $1.51 | +6.14% |
Stock Comparison
ALLLN.PA vs VERIZ.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, VERIZ.BR has a market cap of 227.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while VERIZ.BR trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas VERIZ.BR's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VERIZ.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to VERIZ.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs DTEL.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, DTEL.BR has a market cap of 99.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while DTEL.BR trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas DTEL.BR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DTEL.BR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to DTEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs ORA.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, ORA.PA has a market cap of 32.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while ORA.PA trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas ORA.PA's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ORA.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to ORA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs TFA.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, TFA.BR has a market cap of 22.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while TFA.BR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas TFA.BR's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TFA.BR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to TFA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs KPN.AS Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, KPN.AS has a market cap of 15.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while KPN.AS trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas KPN.AS's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KPN.AS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to KPN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs IAM.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, IAM.PA has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while IAM.PA trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas IAM.PA's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IAM.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to IAM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs TIT.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, TIT.BR has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while TIT.BR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas TIT.BR's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TIT.BR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to TIT.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs TNET.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, TNET.BR has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while TNET.BR trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas TNET.BR's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TNET.BR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to TNET.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs PROX.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, PROX.BR has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while PROX.BR trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas PROX.BR's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PROX.BR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to PROX.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs VEON.AS Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, VEON.AS has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while VEON.AS trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas VEON.AS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VEON.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to VEON.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs NOS.LS Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, NOS.LS has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while NOS.LS trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas NOS.LS's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NOS.LS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to NOS.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs OBEL.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, OBEL.BR has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while OBEL.BR trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas OBEL.BR's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OBEL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to OBEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs TISN.BR Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, TISN.BR has a market cap of 126.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while TISN.BR trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas TISN.BR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TISN.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to TISN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs PAR.MC Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, PAR.MC has a market cap of 64.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while PAR.MC trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas PAR.MC's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PAR.MC's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to PAR.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs ALOSM.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, ALOSM.PA has a market cap of 41.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while ALOSM.PA trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas ALOSM.PA's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ALOSM.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to ALOSM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs PHR.LS Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, PHR.LS has a market cap of 41.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while PHR.LS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas PHR.LS's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PHR.LS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to PHR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs ALBUD.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, ALBUD.PA has a market cap of 21.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while ALBUD.PA trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas ALBUD.PA's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ALBUD.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to ALBUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs LLN.MC Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, LLN.MC has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while LLN.MC trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas LLN.MC's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LLN.MC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to LLN.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs ALBDM.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, ALBDM.PA has a market cap of 3.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while ALBDM.PA trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas ALBDM.PA's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ALBDM.PA's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to ALBDM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs MLWEA.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, MLWEA.PA has a market cap of 886509.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while MLWEA.PA trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas MLWEA.PA's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MLWEA.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is more volatile compared to MLWEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.
ALLLN.PA vs MLNEO.PA Comparison
ALLLN.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLLN.PA stands at 19.56M. In comparison, MLNEO.PA has a market cap of 194058.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALLLN.PA is priced at $1.26, while MLNEO.PA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLLN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas MLNEO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ALLLN.PA's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MLNEO.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLLN.PA is less volatile compared to MLNEO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLLN.PA.