Archon Minerals Limited

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 49.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 10.46B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while FNLPF trades at $14.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 74.68. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ANGPY trades at $6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while IMPUY trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while IMPUF trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and IMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while OICT trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -33.96. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and OICT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GMINF trades at $14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while JINFF trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while POYYF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.89M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 892.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ZMPLF trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 411.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GLGDF trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 363.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ABBRF trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -25.27. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 221.61M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GOTRF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 184.55M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SAPLF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 176.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BRVMF trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 132.41M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while IAUFF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 124.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while PAASF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 112.30M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BOCOF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 106.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SDRC trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -285.50. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 90.37M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 81.11M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SLVTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 77.79M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77.00M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while INMNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and INMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 76.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while XANAF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 73.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BKRRF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ACRG trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and ACRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 70.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ARRKF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and ARRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.52M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TSORF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 53.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while DNRSF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 53.55M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while DNCVF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 53.54M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SMDRF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while FREDF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 52.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while OCGSF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 51.92M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ORVMF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 50.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while PDIV trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 48.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SSVFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -14.79. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 48.19M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while VLMGF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -43.62. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 45.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while CHPGF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 44.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while EMPYF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 40.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while DYNR trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 37.54M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TEUTF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 35.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SNNGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and SNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 35.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SCTSF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 33.25M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ACKRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 31.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while MMNGF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 31.30M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while EQMEF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 28.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while CAPTF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -29.22. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 28.07M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while HEGLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 27.26M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while WEXPF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 25.99M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ADYRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and ADYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.61M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 25.44M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TBXXF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and TBXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 24.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while KDKCF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.78M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 23.06M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and GMDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 22.62M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SSVRF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 22.36M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while WAMFF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 22.27M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ELRFF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 21.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BBBXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 20.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while PVGDF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while URVNF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 20.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SMOFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 20.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while MRZLF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 20.00M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while CJIMF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while MERG trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 19.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while NAUFF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 18.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while RKHNF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and RKHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 18.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while EMPPF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and EMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 17.20M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while CTMCF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 17.16M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BRGC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 16.64M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 15.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BYRG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 14.47M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while LGCXF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 14.42M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while HGLD trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 14.06M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while GBRRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and GBRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while SUNPF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and SUNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 12.88M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF and ASLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 12.36M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while KGFMF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, BWCGF has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while BWCGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas BWCGF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BWCGF's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to BWCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, RVSDF has a market cap of 12.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while RVSDF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas RVSDF's P/E ratio is -16.17. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RVSDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to RVSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12.04M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while MHTZF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, TSLVF has a market cap of 11.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while TSLVF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas TSLVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TSLVF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to TSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.

AHNMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AHNMF stands at 9.63M. In comparison, FSTTF has a market cap of 11.50M. Regarding current trading prices, AHNMF is priced at $0.18, while FSTTF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AHNMF currently has a P/E ratio of -22.11, whereas FSTTF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AHNMF's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FSTTF's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHNMF is less volatile compared to FSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHNMF.