Atacama Resources International, Inc.
Atacama Resources International, Inc. ACRL Peers
See (ACRL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRL | $0.00 | +18.18% | 1.27M | -0.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.40 | +0.18% | 128.91B | 11.34 | $2.24 | +4.88% |
| RTNTF | $78.66 | +6.29% | 109.06B | 11.13 | $7.07 | +2.99% |
| RTPPF | $57.54 | -7.19% | 98.45B | 8.14 | $7.07 | +6.99% |
| GLCNF | $3.58 | +1.27% | 42.96B | -27.50 | -$0.13 | +3.22% |
| GLNCY | $7.14 | +1.64% | 42.87B | -27.44 | -$0.26 | +3.01% |
| GMBXF | $5.25 | -2.34% | 40.90B | 11.42 | $0.46 | +2.47% |
| NGLOY | $14.83 | +4.00% | 35.99B | -11.77 | -$1.26 | +2.16% |
| AAUKF | $28.02 | N/A | 34.00B | -11.08 | -$2.53 | +2.27% |
| FSUGY | $21.65 | +3.10% | 33.28B | 8.56 | $2.53 | +8.39% |
Stock Comparison
ACRL vs BHPLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while BHPLF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs RTNTF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 109.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while RTNTF trades at $78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs RTPPF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs GLCNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while GLCNF trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs GLNCY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while GLNCY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.44. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs GMBXF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 40.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while GMBXF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs NGLOY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 35.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while NGLOY trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AAUKF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AAUKF trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs FSUGY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 33.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while FSUGY trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs FSUMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while FSUMF trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs CMCLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while CMCLF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs TCKRF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs IVPAF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while IVPAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs SHTLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs BOLIF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs BDNNY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while BDNNY trades at $64.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs JXMNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs IPOAF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while IPOAF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ABML Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs SMMYY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while SMMYY trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs STMNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PUTKF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PUTKY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PUTKY trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs NILSY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs LYSCF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while LYSCF trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 118.50. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs LYSDY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while LYSDY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 117.75. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PAEKY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PILBF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PILBF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -103.20. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MALRY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MALRY trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs FLMMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs CHZQ Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MIMTF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs IPGDF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AZZVF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MALRF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs DWMNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs NGXXF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while NGXXF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -35.90. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs IIDDY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs SOUHY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while SOUHY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.31. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ERMAY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ERMAY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ERMAF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PTNDY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs NICMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while NICMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AFBOF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PTNDF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs DETRF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ILKAF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ILKAF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs FMCXF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while FMCXF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -66.77. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AZRMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs LINRF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ILKAY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ILKAY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs BQSSF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while BQSSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.75. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs STTSY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ADMLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 911.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ADMLF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ADTLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 890.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ADTLF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ATUSF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 885.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ATUSF trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AUSDF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs JMXXF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AFMJF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 855.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AMVMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 738.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AMVMF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -22.23. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs VULNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 670.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while VULNF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs NCKAF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 638.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MFRVF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs CTJHF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs TAOFF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ALMTF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 497.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ALMTF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs TTNNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs OSTTF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PXMFF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 481.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MJDLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 475.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MJDLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MCRZF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs BIRNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs NQMIY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs REEMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 367.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while REEMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs FGOVF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 364.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -69.02. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MCHHF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ERLFF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 357.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -34.47. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs CTJHY Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MNXMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 336.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MNXMF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs KMRPF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MLYF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs MLXEF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 314.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while MLXEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs AUMTF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ARAFF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 304.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs SLGGF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs CGMLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 283.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs LTSRF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 280.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs SVMLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 278.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs LRSRF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs FWEDF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 256.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while FWEDF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PMETF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 253.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PMETF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.67. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs STQNF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs SYAAF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 239.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while SYAAF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs RXRLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs LTHHF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs BSRUF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs PTTMF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs CILLF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.
ACRL vs ERDCF Comparison
ACRL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACRL stands at 1.27M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 231.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRL is priced at $0.00, while ERDCF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACRL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -63.89. In terms of profitability, ACRL's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRL is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRL.