create restaurants holdings inc.
create restaurants holdings inc. 3387.T Peers
See (3387.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3387.T | $1,386.00 | -0.65% | 291.65B | 49.68 | $27.90 | +0.57% |
| 7550.T | $8,095.00 | -0.37% | 1.27T | 33.66 | $240.50 | +0.86% |
| 2702.T | $6,060.00 | -0.49% | 805.73B | 25.19 | $240.56 | +0.80% |
| 3197.T | $3,135.00 | -1.14% | 713.22B | 47.76 | $65.64 | +0.58% |
| 3563.T | $6,029.00 | +0.75% | 682.14B | 35.98 | $167.55 | +0.50% |
| 3350.T | $933.00 | +19.16% | 435.07B | 49.68 | $18.78 | N/A |
| 3397.T | $4,207.00 | -0.97% | 368.73B | 247.62 | $16.99 | +0.24% |
| 7581.T | $4,825.00 | -0.72% | 236.63B | 23.25 | $207.52 | +0.51% |
| 9861.T | $3,173.00 | -0.81% | 205.33B | 53.91 | $58.86 | +0.63% |
| 9936.T | $3,445.00 | -1.43% | 194.68B | 24.10 | $142.95 | +1.43% |
Stock Comparison
3387.T vs 7550.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7550.T has a market cap of 1.27T. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7550.T trades at $8,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7550.T's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7550.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7550.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2702.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2702.T has a market cap of 805.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2702.T trades at $6,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2702.T's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2702.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 2702.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3197.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3197.T has a market cap of 713.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3197.T trades at $3,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3197.T's P/E ratio is 47.76. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3197.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3197.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3563.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3563.T has a market cap of 682.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3563.T trades at $6,029.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3563.T's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3563.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3563.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3350.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3350.T has a market cap of 435.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3350.T trades at $933.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3350.T's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3350.T's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3350.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3397.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3397.T has a market cap of 368.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3397.T trades at $4,207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3397.T's P/E ratio is 247.62. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3397.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7581.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7581.T has a market cap of 236.63B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7581.T trades at $4,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7581.T's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7581.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7581.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9861.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9861.T has a market cap of 205.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9861.T trades at $3,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9861.T's P/E ratio is 53.91. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9861.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9861.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9936.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9936.T has a market cap of 194.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9936.T trades at $3,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9936.T's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9936.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 9936.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7616.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7616.T has a market cap of 193.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7616.T trades at $1,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7616.T's P/E ratio is 243.20. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7616.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7616.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9873.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9873.T has a market cap of 145.03B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9873.T trades at $6,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9873.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9873.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9873.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7630.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7630.T has a market cap of 144.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7630.T trades at $907.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7630.T's P/E ratio is 45.58. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7630.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7630.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3097.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3097.T has a market cap of 133.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3097.T trades at $3,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3097.T's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3097.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3097.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3543.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3543.T has a market cap of 129.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3543.T trades at $2,851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3543.T's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3543.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3543.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8179.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8179.T has a market cap of 126.63B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8179.T trades at $2,572.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8179.T's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8179.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 8179.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7412.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7412.T has a market cap of 124.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7412.T trades at $644.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7412.T's P/E ratio is 247.69. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7412.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2695.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2695.T has a market cap of 122.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2695.T trades at $3,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2695.T's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2695.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2695.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7611.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7611.T has a market cap of 118.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7611.T trades at $3,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7611.T's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7611.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7611.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3087.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3087.T has a market cap of 115.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3087.T trades at $2,632.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3087.T's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3087.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3087.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8153.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8153.T has a market cap of 112.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8153.T trades at $3,660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8153.T's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8153.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 8153.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9887.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9887.T has a market cap of 105.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9887.T trades at $5,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9887.T's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9887.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9887.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9945.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9945.T has a market cap of 101.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9945.T trades at $2,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9945.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9945.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3085.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3085.T has a market cap of 97.57B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3085.T trades at $3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3085.T's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3085.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2157.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2157.T has a market cap of 83.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2157.T trades at $1,011.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2157.T's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2157.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7421.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7421.T has a market cap of 72.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7421.T trades at $1,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7421.T's P/E ratio is 70.43. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7421.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7421.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9828.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9828.T has a market cap of 71.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9828.T trades at $4,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9828.T's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9828.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 9828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9279.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9279.T has a market cap of 66.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9279.T trades at $3,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9279.T's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9279.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 9279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8160.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8160.T has a market cap of 65.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8160.T trades at $2,320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8160.T's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8160.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 8160.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2752.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2752.T has a market cap of 62.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2752.T trades at $1,214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2752.T's P/E ratio is 208.59. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2752.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2752.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8200.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8200.T has a market cap of 57.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8200.T trades at $2,236.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8200.T's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8200.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 8200.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3395.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3395.T has a market cap of 53.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3395.T trades at $2,454.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3395.T's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3395.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3395.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3091.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3091.T has a market cap of 52.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3091.T trades at $3,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3091.T's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3091.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3091.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9900.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9900.T has a market cap of 51.78B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9900.T trades at $1,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9900.T's P/E ratio is 44.39. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9900.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9900.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3399.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3399.T has a market cap of 49.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3399.T trades at $5,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3399.T's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3399.T's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8163.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8163.T has a market cap of 49.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8163.T trades at $1,186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8163.T's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8163.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 8163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3198.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3198.T has a market cap of 48.63B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3198.T trades at $2,133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3198.T's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3198.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3198.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3196.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3196.T has a market cap of 44.50B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3196.T trades at $2,093.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3196.T's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3196.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3196.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3133.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3133.T has a market cap of 44.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3133.T trades at $801.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3133.T's P/E ratio is -64.39. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3133.T's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3133.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3561.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3561.T has a market cap of 40.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3561.T trades at $1,362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3561.T's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3561.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7522.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7522.T has a market cap of 40.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7522.T trades at $1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7522.T's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7522.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7522.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2705.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2705.T has a market cap of 37.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2705.T trades at $5,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2705.T's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2705.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 2705.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3193.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3193.T has a market cap of 32.78B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3193.T trades at $2,842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3193.T's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3193.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2753.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2753.T has a market cap of 29.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2753.T trades at $1,414.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2753.T's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2753.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2753.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3221.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3221.T has a market cap of 26.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3221.T trades at $2,626.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3221.T's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3221.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3221.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3073.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3073.T has a market cap of 23.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3073.T trades at $1,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3073.T's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3073.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3073.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9979.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9979.T has a market cap of 23.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9979.T trades at $1,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9979.T's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9979.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9979.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3178.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3178.T has a market cap of 23.56B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3178.T trades at $1,221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3178.T's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3178.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3178.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2882.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2882.T has a market cap of 23.03B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2882.T trades at $2,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2882.T's P/E ratio is 71.43. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2882.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 2882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9850.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9850.T has a market cap of 22.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9850.T trades at $983.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9850.T's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9850.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 9850.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7678.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7678.T has a market cap of 22.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7678.T trades at $4,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7678.T's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7678.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7678.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7621.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7621.T has a market cap of 20.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7621.T trades at $3,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7621.T's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7621.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7554.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7554.T has a market cap of 19.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7554.T trades at $1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7554.T's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7554.T's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7554.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3068.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3068.T has a market cap of 18.83B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3068.T trades at $3,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3068.T's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3068.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3068.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3075.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3075.T has a market cap of 18.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3075.T trades at $1,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3075.T's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3075.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3075.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3329.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3329.T has a market cap of 16.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3329.T trades at $2,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3329.T's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3329.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2694.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2694.T has a market cap of 16.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2694.T trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2694.T's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2694.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2694.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7562.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7562.T has a market cap of 16.46B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7562.T trades at $7,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7562.T's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7562.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7562.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9701.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9701.T has a market cap of 12.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9701.T trades at $3,890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9701.T's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9701.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9701.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3547.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3547.T has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3547.T trades at $1,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3547.T's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3547.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T and 3547.T have similar daily volatility (1.37).
3387.T vs 3053.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3053.T has a market cap of 12.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3053.T trades at $207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3053.T's P/E ratio is 431.25. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3053.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3418.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3418.T has a market cap of 12.36B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3418.T trades at $1,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3418.T's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3418.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3175.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3175.T has a market cap of 11.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3175.T trades at $890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3175.T's P/E ratio is -169.20. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3175.T's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7561.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7561.T has a market cap of 10.95B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7561.T trades at $592.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7561.T's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7561.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8207.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8207.T has a market cap of 10.50B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8207.T trades at $267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8207.T's P/E ratio is 72.16. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8207.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 8207.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 5891.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 5891.T has a market cap of 10.24B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 5891.T trades at $1,812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 5891.T's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5891.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 5891.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3082.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3082.T has a market cap of 10.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3082.T trades at $903.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3082.T's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3082.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9950.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9950.T has a market cap of 9.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9950.T trades at $3,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9950.T's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9950.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9950.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 6082.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 6082.T has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 6082.T trades at $1,002.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 6082.T's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6082.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 6082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2764.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2764.T has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2764.T trades at $138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2764.T's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2764.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2764.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2798.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2798.T has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2798.T trades at $2,924.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2798.T's P/E ratio is 84.75. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2798.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 2798.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3030.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3030.T has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3030.T trades at $742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3030.T's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3030.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3030.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7682.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7682.T has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7682.T trades at $4,275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7682.T's P/E ratio is 115.48. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7682.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3063.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3063.T has a market cap of 8.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3063.T trades at $708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3063.T's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3063.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3063.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7674.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7674.T has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7674.T trades at $3,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7674.T's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7674.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3069.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3069.T has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3069.T trades at $162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3069.T's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3069.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3069.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7604.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7604.T has a market cap of 7.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7604.T trades at $835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7604.T's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7604.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7604.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9853.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9853.T has a market cap of 5.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9853.T trades at $902.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9853.T's P/E ratio is -72.98. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9853.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9853.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3065.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3065.T has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3065.T trades at $1,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3065.T's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3065.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3065.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7918.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7918.T has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7918.T trades at $109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7918.T's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7918.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7918.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9973.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9973.T has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9973.T trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9973.T's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9973.T's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 9973.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3557.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3557.T has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3557.T trades at $899.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3557.T's P/E ratio is -37.06. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3557.T's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3067.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3067.T has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3067.T trades at $453.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3067.T's P/E ratio is 103.42. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3067.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 9969.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 9969.T has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 9969.T trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 9969.T's P/E ratio is -39.37. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9969.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 9969.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7625.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7625.T has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7625.T trades at $348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7625.T's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7625.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 7625.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3317.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3317.T has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3317.T trades at $2,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3317.T's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3317.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3317.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3224.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3224.T has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3224.T trades at $737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3224.T's P/E ratio is -28.24. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3224.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3224.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3372.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3372.T has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3372.T trades at $243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3372.T's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3372.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3372.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3358.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3358.T has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3358.T trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3358.T's P/E ratio is 160.94. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3358.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3358.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2762.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2762.T has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2762.T trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2762.T's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2762.T's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 2762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 2789.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 2789.T has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 2789.T trades at $455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 2789.T's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2789.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 2789.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8181.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8181.T has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8181.T trades at $853.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8181.T's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8181.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 8181.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 138A.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 138A.T has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 138A.T trades at $1,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 138A.T's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 138A.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 138A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3077.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3077.T has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3077.T trades at $312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3077.T's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3077.T's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3077.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7524.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7524.T has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7524.T trades at $198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7524.T's P/E ratio is -404.08. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7524.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7524.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 7585.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 7585.T has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 7585.T trades at $411.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 7585.T's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7585.T's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 7585.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3223.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3223.T has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3223.T trades at $885.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3223.T's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3223.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is more volatile compared to 3223.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 3370.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 3370.T has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 3370.T trades at $316.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 3370.T's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3370.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 3370.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.
3387.T vs 8209.T Comparison
3387.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3387.T stands at 291.65B. In comparison, 8209.T has a market cap of 955.36M. Regarding current trading prices, 3387.T is priced at $1,386.00, while 8209.T trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3387.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 8209.T's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, 3387.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8209.T's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 3387.T is less volatile compared to 8209.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3387.T.