Mainland Headwear Holdings Limited
Mainland Headwear Holdings Limited 1100.HK Peers
See (1100.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1100.HK | $1.45 | -4.61% | 622.29M | 11.15 | $0.13 | +6.21% |
| 1910.HK | $13.98 | +0.14% | 19.34B | 7.56 | $1.85 | +5.71% |
| 0551.HK | $12.02 | +1.01% | 19.29B | 6.33 | $1.90 | +9.15% |
| 1836.HK | $16.40 | +0.12% | 13.67B | 10.19 | $1.61 | +3.96% |
| 1361.HK | $4.32 | -1.14% | 8.93B | 7.20 | $0.60 | +6.65% |
| 1121.HK | $1.56 | -1.89% | 2.83B | -9.18 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| 3813.HK | $0.51 | +3.03% | 2.64B | 5.10 | $0.10 | +9.41% |
| 0210.HK | $0.47 | -2.08% | 929.94M | 7.83 | $0.06 | +2.13% |
| 1731.HK | $0.80 | N/A | 896.00M | 3.81 | $0.21 | +6.25% |
| 0264.HK | $1.90 | N/A | 820.31M | -47.50 | -$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1100.HK vs 1910.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1910.HK has a market cap of 19.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1910.HK trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1910.HK's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1910.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1910.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 0551.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 0551.HK has a market cap of 19.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 0551.HK trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 0551.HK's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0551.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 0551.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1836.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1836.HK has a market cap of 13.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1836.HK trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1836.HK's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1836.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1361.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1361.HK has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1361.HK trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1361.HK's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1361.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1361.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1121.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1121.HK has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1121.HK trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1121.HK's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1121.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is less volatile compared to 1121.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 3813.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 3813.HK has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 3813.HK trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 3813.HK's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3813.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 3813.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 0210.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 0210.HK has a market cap of 929.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 0210.HK trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 0210.HK's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0210.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 0210.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1731.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1731.HK has a market cap of 896.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1731.HK trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1731.HK's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1731.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1731.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 0264.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 0264.HK has a market cap of 820.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 0264.HK trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 0264.HK's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0264.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 0264.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 0676.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 0676.HK has a market cap of 730.65M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 0676.HK trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 0676.HK's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0676.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 0676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 2033.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 2033.HK has a market cap of 679.16M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 2033.HK trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 2033.HK's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2033.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 2033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1028.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1028.HK has a market cap of 529.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1028.HK trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1028.HK's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1028.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is less volatile compared to 1028.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1023.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1023.HK has a market cap of 481.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1023.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1023.HK's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1023.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1027.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1027.HK has a market cap of 404.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1027.HK trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1027.HK's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1027.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1027.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1170.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1170.HK has a market cap of 398.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1170.HK trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1170.HK's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1170.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1170.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 2683.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 2683.HK has a market cap of 220.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 2683.HK trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 2683.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2683.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 2683.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 0738.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 0738.HK has a market cap of 211.77M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 0738.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 0738.HK's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0738.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 0738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 8187.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 8187.HK has a market cap of 150.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 8187.HK trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 8187.HK's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8187.HK's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 8187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1058.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1058.HK has a market cap of 142.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1058.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1058.HK's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1058.HK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1058.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1842.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1842.HK has a market cap of 81.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1842.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1842.HK's P/E ratio is 75.56. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1842.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is less volatile compared to 1842.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 1255.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 1255.HK has a market cap of 72.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 1255.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 1255.HK's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1255.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 1255.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.
1100.HK vs 8285.HK Comparison
1100.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1100.HK stands at 622.29M. In comparison, 8285.HK has a market cap of 14.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 1100.HK is priced at $1.45, while 8285.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1100.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas 8285.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1100.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8285.HK's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1100.HK is more volatile compared to 8285.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1100.HK.