T-Mobile US, Inc.
T-Mobile US, Inc. 0R2L.L Peers
See (0R2L.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0R2L.L | $240.04 | +2.48% | 272.55B | 107.16 | $2.24 | +1.28% |
| 0R15.L | $7,935.00 | +3.29% | 11.41T | N/A | N/A | +0.55% |
| 0LQQ.L | $9.28 | +2.77% | 23.06B | 12.37 | $0.75 | +6.68% |
| VOD.L | $70.10 | +2.58% | 17.42B | 10.01 | $0.07 | +6.83% |
| BT-A.L | $165.15 | +1.76% | 16.18B | 20.64 | $0.08 | +4.90% |
| SKMD.IL | $19.91 | -1.04% | 12.76B | 10.42 | $1.91 | N/A |
| 0XHR.L | $15.91 | +1.31% | 11.99B | 0.68 | $23.52 | N/A |
| SKMD.L | $22.10 | -1.60% | 8.71B | 11.57 | $1.91 | N/A |
| 0QAL.IL | $2.35 | -0.01% | 7.00B | 26.14 | $0.09 | +8.55% |
| AAF.L | $175.80 | +0.69% | 6.43B | 35.16 | $0.05 | +2.15% |
Stock Comparison
0R2L.L vs 0R15.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0R15.L has a market cap of 11.41T. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0R15.L trades at $7,935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0R15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R15.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to 0R15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0LQQ.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0LQQ.L has a market cap of 23.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0LQQ.L trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0LQQ.L's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0LQQ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to 0LQQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs VOD.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, VOD.L has a market cap of 17.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while VOD.L trades at $70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas VOD.L's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOD.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to VOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs BT-A.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, BT-A.L has a market cap of 16.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while BT-A.L trades at $165.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas BT-A.L's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BT-A.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to BT-A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs SKMD.IL Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, SKMD.IL has a market cap of 12.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while SKMD.IL trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas SKMD.IL's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKMD.IL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to SKMD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0XHR.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0XHR.L has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0XHR.L trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0XHR.L's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0XHR.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0R2L.L has daily volatility of 2.44 and 0XHR.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0R2L.L vs SKMD.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, SKMD.L has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while SKMD.L trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas SKMD.L's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKMD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to SKMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0QAL.IL Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0QAL.IL has a market cap of 7.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0QAL.IL trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0QAL.IL's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QAL.IL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to 0QAL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs AAF.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, AAF.L has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while AAF.L trades at $175.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas AAF.L's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAF.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to AAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs ZEG.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, ZEG.L has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while ZEG.L trades at $656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas ZEG.L's P/E ratio is 72.89. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZEG.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to ZEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0HVP.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0HVP.L has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0HVP.L trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0HVP.L's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HVP.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to 0HVP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0JDO.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0JDO.L has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0JDO.L trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0JDO.L's P/E ratio is -2561.64. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0JDO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to 0JDO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs RKMD.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, RKMD.L has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while RKMD.L trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas RKMD.L's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RKMD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to RKMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0IYQ.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0IYQ.L has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0IYQ.L trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0IYQ.L's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0IYQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to 0IYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs HTWS.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, HTWS.L has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while HTWS.L trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas HTWS.L's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HTWS.L's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to HTWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0MDS.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0MDS.L has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0MDS.L trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0MDS.L's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0MDS.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to 0MDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs GAMA.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, GAMA.L has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while GAMA.L trades at $1,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas GAMA.L's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAMA.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to GAMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs OIH.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, OIH.L has a market cap of 71.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while OIH.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas OIH.L's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OIH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to OIH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs ADT.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, ADT.L has a market cap of 50.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while ADT.L trades at $200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas ADT.L's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADT.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to ADT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs 0FQ8.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, 0FQ8.L has a market cap of 44.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while 0FQ8.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas 0FQ8.L's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0FQ8.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to 0FQ8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs MAI.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, MAI.L has a market cap of 35.19M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while MAI.L trades at $245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas MAI.L's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to MAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs BBB.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, BBB.L has a market cap of 11.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while BBB.L trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas BBB.L's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBB.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to BBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs ORNT.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, ORNT.L has a market cap of 800000.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while ORNT.L trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas ORNT.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORNT.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is less volatile compared to ORNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.
0R2L.L vs TOOP.L Comparison
0R2L.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R2L.L stands at 272.55B. In comparison, TOOP.L has a market cap of 430981.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0R2L.L is priced at $240.04, while TOOP.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R2L.L currently has a P/E ratio of 107.16, whereas TOOP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R2L.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TOOP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R2L.L is more volatile compared to TOOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R2L.L.