NH Hotel Group, S.A.
NH Hotel Group, S.A. 0OHG.L Peers
See (0OHG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0OHG.L | $6.30 | -0.32% | 2.74B | -29.72 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| 0JYW.L | $274.96 | +1.81% | 75.31B | 61.09 | $4.50 | +0.92% |
| 0J5I.L | $257.77 | +2.33% | 59.15B | 99.56 | $2.59 | +0.23% |
| 0QYD.L | $145.00 | -1.38% | 40.30B | 26.35 | $5.50 | +1.88% |
| 0QY4.L | $42.48 | +0.14% | 28.16B | 17.57 | $2.42 | +2.12% |
| IHG.L | $9,180.00 | +1.80% | 14.24B | 31.88 | $2.88 | +1.17% |
| 0QYK.L | $96.37 | +1.63% | 10.08B | -16.80 | -$5.74 | +1.04% |
| 0UC3.L | $19.26 | +0.53% | 8.61B | -1.81 | -$10.63 | N/A |
| 0KJD.L | $94.26 | +0.05% | 7.92B | 149.62 | $0.63 | N/A |
| WTB.L | $2,853.00 | +0.53% | 5.02B | 20.23 | $1.41 | +3.48% |
Stock Comparison
0OHG.L vs 0JYW.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0JYW.L has a market cap of 75.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0JYW.L trades at $274.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0JYW.L's P/E ratio is 61.09. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0JYW.L's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0JYW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0J5I.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0J5I.L has a market cap of 59.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0J5I.L trades at $257.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0J5I.L's P/E ratio is 99.56. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0J5I.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0J5I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0QYD.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0QYD.L has a market cap of 40.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0QYD.L trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0QYD.L's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0QYD.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0QYD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0QY4.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0QY4.L has a market cap of 28.16B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0QY4.L trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0QY4.L's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0QY4.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0QY4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs IHG.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, IHG.L has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while IHG.L trades at $9,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas IHG.L's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHG.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to IHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0QYK.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0QYK.L has a market cap of 10.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0QYK.L trades at $96.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0QYK.L's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0QYK.L's ROE of -2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0QYK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0UC3.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0UC3.L has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0UC3.L trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0UC3.L's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0UC3.L's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0UC3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0KJD.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0KJD.L has a market cap of 7.92B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0KJD.L trades at $94.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0KJD.L's P/E ratio is 149.62. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0KJD.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is more volatile compared to 0KJD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs WTB.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, WTB.L has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while WTB.L trades at $2,853.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas WTB.L's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to WTB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs MDO.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, MDO.L has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while MDO.L trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas MDO.L's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDO.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is more volatile compared to MDO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs DAL.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, DAL.L has a market cap of 951.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while DAL.L trades at $450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas DAL.L's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAL.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to DAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0QS9.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0QS9.L has a market cap of 934.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0QS9.L trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0QS9.L's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0QS9.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0QS9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs 0OQ0.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, 0OQ0.L has a market cap of 695.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while 0OQ0.L trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas 0OQ0.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0OQ0.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to 0OQ0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs PPH.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, PPH.L has a market cap of 558.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while PPH.L trades at $1,334.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas PPH.L's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPH.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to PPH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.
0OHG.L vs SSTY.L Comparison
0OHG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OHG.L stands at 2.74B. In comparison, SSTY.L has a market cap of 13.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OHG.L is priced at $6.30, while SSTY.L trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OHG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -29.72, whereas SSTY.L's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, 0OHG.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSTY.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OHG.L is less volatile compared to SSTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OHG.L.