Pinnacle West Capital Corporation

0KIT.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KIT.L stands at 10.87B. In comparison, NG.L has a market cap of 50.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KIT.L is priced at $91.03, while NG.L trades at $1,024.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NG.L's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, 0KIT.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NG.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KIT.L is less volatile compared to NG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KIT.L.

0KIT.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KIT.L stands at 10.87B. In comparison, CKI.L has a market cap of 13.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KIT.L is priced at $91.03, while CKI.L trades at $526.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CKI.L's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, 0KIT.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0KIT.L is less volatile compared to CKI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KIT.L.

0KIT.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KIT.L stands at 10.87B. In comparison, RIFS.L has a market cap of 465.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KIT.L is priced at $91.03, while RIFS.L trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas RIFS.L's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 0KIT.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIFS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KIT.L and RIFS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0KIT.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KIT.L stands at 10.87B. In comparison, NTEA.L has a market cap of 145.16M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KIT.L is priced at $91.03, while NTEA.L trades at $130.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NTEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0KIT.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTEA.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KIT.L and NTEA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0KIT.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0KIT.L stands at 10.87B. In comparison, JEL.L has a market cap of 127.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KIT.L is priced at $91.03, while JEL.L trades at $430.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0KIT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas JEL.L's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, 0KIT.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KIT.L is less volatile compared to JEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KIT.L.